Introduction
COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 that emerged in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. It was declared a global pandemic on March 11, 2020. While infecting more than 629 million people worldwide and causing over 6.5 million deaths worldwide, COVID-19 has been noted to produce various symptoms throughout several organ systems. While COVID-19 primarily affects the pulmonary system, other systems such as the cardiovascular, renal, gastrointestinal, and nervous systems have been susceptible to the virus [1-3]. Some noted neurological symptoms include nonspecific symptoms such as headache, anosmia, and dizziness. In contrast, more severe neurological symptoms include cerebral thrombosis, delirium, stroke, encephalitis, ataxia, and conditions of neuronal demyelination, including transverse myelitis (TM) [3,4].
SARS-CoV-2 most commonly enters the body through inhalation of aerosolized respiratory droplets, which then attach to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors in the alveoli epithelium. However, ACE2 receptors have also been found in neurological cells such as neurons and glial cells [2]. The virus may enter through the olfactory bulb, which then enters the central nervous system, causing inflammation and damage, leading to neurological complications [4].
As TM is a devastating disease associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, recognizing the neurological sequelae of the disease is of utmost importance in guiding patient care. There are numerous proposed etiologies for TM, including paraneoplastic, autoimmune (perhaps due to multiple sclerosis or acute disseminating encephalomyelitis), and para-infectious causes (due to Herpes simplex virus or Mycoplasma pneumoniae) in which the body's response to the foreign pathogen mistakenly affects proteins in myelin. A few cases have been published regarding TM and COVID-19 as the complication is quite rare [5-10]. Here, we present the case of a healthy, immunocompetent woman who developed a case of TM after being infected with the COVID-19 virus.
Note: This paper was previously posted to the preprint server available at Research Square (https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1543376/v1) on July 8, 2022.
Case presentation
A 55-year-old Asian woman with no notable family history, travel history, or past medical history presented to the emergency room with a primary complaint of generalized weakness, urinary incontinence, and tingling of the abdomen. The patient stated that she experienced these symptoms for approximately the past two weeks. In the initial presentation, she stated that she had previously experienced mild flu-like symptoms during the previous weeks but denied any symptoms at present. Due to hospital protocols at the time of admission, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to test the patient for COVID-19 infection, and it was positive. It was suspected that the patient had a previous COVID-19 infection, which accounts for her positive result at the hospital. In the hospital, she was placed in isolation while further testing and imaging were ordered to determine the cause of her symptoms. A physical exam revealed 3+ hyperreflexia of the bilateral patellar and Achilles reflexes and a positive Babinski reflex bilaterally. Pinprick sensation revealed an almost complete loss of sensation to pinprick at the level of T5 dermatome and below bilaterally. There were no other pertinent positive findings on the initial physical examination.
Based on her initial presenting symptoms, an MRI of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine with and without contrast was ordered, along with an MRI of the orbits with and without contrast and a CT scan of the brain without contrast. The MRI of the spine revealed hyperintensity beginning at the lower cervical spine at the levels of C5-C6, extending down to the conus medullaris (Figure 1). Along with this, a small syrinx approximately 2 mm in diameter was found extending from the levels of T7-T8 to T8-T9 (Figure 2). Along with these findings, the MRI report revealed disc osteophytes at C4-C5 and C5-C6. Bilateral pulmonary infiltrates were also found, and a follow-up chest radiograph was ordered. The MRI report of the orbits revealed a few periventricular foci of white matter demyelination with slight bifrontal predominance. CT of the brain revealed no abnormalities.
Figure 1
Hyperintensity at the level of C5-C6 extending down to the conus medullaris.
Figure 2
A 2-mm-long syrinx from about the levels of T7-T9.
Along with the imaging studies, basic complete blood count (CBC), complete metabolic profile (CMP), urinalysis, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, serum immunochemistry and serology, and infectious disease workup were ordered to determine possible etiologies of the patient's presenting symptoms that correlate with the imaging findings. The patient's initial CBC was unremarkable aside from an elevated neutrophil count of 11,000, and the urinalysis also returned normal. However, the CMP revealed numerous abnormalities. Potassium levels were measured at 3.1 mmol/L, glucose at 135 mmol/L, creatinine at 0.5 mg/dL, albumin at 5.1 g/dL, globulin at 3 g/dL, and the blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/creatinine ratio at 24 mg/dL (Table 1).
Table 1
Complete metabolic profile on March 25, 2021.
A/G, albumin-globulin; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine transaminase; AGAP, anion gap; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; SGPT, serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase
Complete metabolic profile | ||
Test | Results | Reference |
Sodium | 139 mmol/L | 136-144 mmol/L |
Potassium | 3.1 mmol/L (Low) | 3.7-5.1 mmol/L |
Chloride | 98 mmol/L | 96-106 mmol/L |
CO2 | 30 mmol/L (High) | 23-29 mmol/L |
Glucose | 135 mg/dL (High) | 77-99 mg/dL |
BUN | 12 mg/dL | 6-24 mg/dL |
Creatinine | 0.5 mg/dL (Low) | 0.74-1.35 mg/dL |
Calcium | 9.7 mg/dL | 8.5-10.2 mg/dL |
Total protein | 8 g/dL | 6-8.3 g/dL |
Albumin | 5.1 g/dL (High) | 3.5-5 g/dL |
Total bilirubin | 0.5 mg/dL | 0.1-1.2 mg/dL |
Alkaline phosphatase | 78 IU/L | 44-147 IU/L |
AST | 26 U/L | 8-33 U/L |
ALT (SGPT) | 23 U/L | 4-36 U/L |
BUN/creatinine ratio | 24 (High) | 10:1 to 20:1 |
Globulin | 3 g/dL | 2-2.9 g/dL |
A/G ratio | 2 | |
AGAP | 11 mEq/L | 4-12 mEq/L |
Total CPK | 114 mcg/L | 10-120 mcg/L |
Concurrent with obtaining and evaluating the CBC and CMP, an infectious disease panel was also carried out to identify the possible virus and bacterial infection (Table 2). An autoimmune panel (Table 3) was also carried out to ensure no other autoimmune etiology. However, all results of that panel came back negative.
Table 2
Infectious disease panel.
Ab, antibody; CMV, cytomegalovirus; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; VDRL, Venereal Disease Research Laboratory; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; VZV, varicella-zoster virus
Infectious disease workup | ||
Test | Results | Reference |
Syphilis serology (VDRL) | Nonreactive | Nonreactive |
Lyme total Ab | 0.29 | <0.90 (negative) |
Chikungunya virus IgG | 0.18 | 0.79 or less |
Chikungunya virus IgM | 0.58 | 0.79 or less |
SARS-CoV-2 PCR | Positive | Not detected |
CMV DNA quantification Ab | Negative | Not detected |
CMV DNA PCR log10 | Test not performed | Not detected |
CMV IgG index | 5.4 | <0.5 U/mL |
Enterovirus RNA PCR | Negative | Not detected |
EBV IgM Ab titer | <0.2 | <18 U/mL |
EBV capsid Ag IgG Ab | >0.8 | <18 U/mL |
EBV nuclear Ag Ab | >8.0 | <18 U/mL |
Herpes Simplex 1 IgG index | 1.6 | <0.8 U/mL |
Herpesvirus 6 IgG Ab | 0.26 | Below limit of detection |
Herpesvirus 6 IgM Ab | <1:20 | <1:10 (Below limit of detection) |
HIV 1 and HIV 2 Ag/Ab | Nonreactive | Not detected |
Influenza A rapid | Negative | Not detected |
Influenza B rapid | Negative | Not detected |
Mumps virus IgM Ab | <0.80 | 0.79 or less |
Rubeola IgG | 1.2 | 13.4 or less |
Rubeola IgM | <0.91 | <1.20 |
VZV IgG Ab | 4.8 | 134.9 or less |
VZV IgM Ab | <0.91 | <0.91 |
Table 3
Autoimmune panel.
Ab, antibody; ANA, antinuclear antibody; RNP, ribonucleoprotein; GPI, glycoprotein I
Autoimmune panel | ||
Test | Result | Reference |
Rheumatoid factor | Negative | Normal: negative |
ANA screen | Negative | Normal: negative |
Jo-1 | <0.2 | <1 |
SS-A/Ro Ab | <0.2 | <1 |
SS-B/La Ab | <0.2 | <1 |
Smith Ab | <0.2 | 19 or less |
RNP Ab | <0.2 | 19 or less |
Scl-70 Scleroderma Ab | <0.2 | <1 |
Double-stranded DNA Ab | 1.1 | <4.9 |
MAG IgM Ab | <800 | <1:1,600 |
Beta-2-GPI IgG Ab | <2.4 | <15 |
B Beta-2-GPI IgM Ab | 1.4 | <15 |
Thyroglobulin Ab | <20 | <20 |
Thyroid peroxidase Ab | <10 | <35 |
Cardiolipin IgG Ab | <1.4 | <40 |
Cardiolipin IgM Ab | 1.4 | <40 |
Complement C3 | 127 | 80-178 |
Complement C4 | 33.7 | 12-42 |
A serological study was also conducted to see if any immunological markers or bacterial/viral antigens could be detected on PCR. However, similar to the aforementioned autoimmune panel, all values that were tested for came back negative (Table 4).
Table 4
Immunology/serology panel (March 27, 2021).
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Immunology/Serology | ||
Test | Result | Reference |
SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 PCR | Positive | Not detected |
SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 IgG | Positive | Not detected |
Adenovirus PCR | Negative | Not detected |
Antinuclear antibody | Negative | Not detected |
SSA IgG | Negative | Not detected |
SSB IgG | Negative | Not detected |
Bordetella pertussis PCR | Not detected | Not detected |
Bordetella parapertussis PCR | Not detected | Not detected |
Chlamydia pneumonia PCR (not COVID-19) | Not detected | Not detected |
Coronavirus 229E PCR (not COVID-19) | Not detected | Not detected |
Coronavirus HKU1 PCR (not COVID-19) | Not detected | Not detected |
Coronavirus NL63 PCR (not COVID-19) | Not detected | Not detected |
Coronavirus DC43 PCR (not COVID-19) | Not detected | Not detected |
Influenza B PCR | Not detected | Not detected |
Influenza A PCR | Not detected | Not detected |
Metapneumovirus PCR | Not detected | Not detected |
Mycoplasma pneumoniae PCR | Not detected | Not detected |
Myelin basic protein CSF | >128 ng/mL (High) | <4 ng/mL |
RSV PCR | Not detected | Not detected |
MRSA rapid screen | Not detected | Not detected |
Rhinovirus PCR | Not detected | Not detected |
Parainfluenza 1 PCR | Not detected | Not detected |
Parainfluenza 2 PCR | Not detected | Not detected |
Parainfluenza 3 PCR | Not detected | Not detected |
Parainfluenza 4 PCR | Not detected | Not detected |
Finally, the CSF was checked for particular markers that could indicate that a viral pathogen was responsible for the patient's transverse myelitis (Table 5). Upon evaluation of the patient's CSF, it was noted that the total protein level was elevated at 87 mg/dL, glucose was within the normal range at 63 mg/mL, and the IgG level was elevated at 9.7. In addition to the parameters observed, the level of myelin basic protein observed in the CSF was above 128 ng/mL. According to the most recently accepted guidelines, a value between 4 and 9 ng/mL indicates a long-term breakdown of myelin basic protein. In contrast, a level >9 ng/mL is most associated with an active breakdown of myelin at the time of CSF extraction. Due to the patient's myelin basic protein level being more than 14× the accepted cutoff value, it was determined that the patient is undergoing active destruction of myelin. All these laboratory values, when put together, indicate that a viral etiology is the cause of this patient's transverse myelitis.
Table 5
CSF evaluation (March 26, 2021).
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; IgG, immunoglobulin G; PCR, polymerase chain reaction
CSF evaluation | Measured | Reference |
Glucose | 63 mg/dL | 50-75 mg/dL |
IgG | 9.7 (High) | 0-0.7 mg/L |
Total protein | 87 (High) | 20-40 mg/dL |
Clarity | Hazy | N/A |
Color | Light pink | Clear |
Neutrophils | 58 | <5 per mm³ |
Lymphocytes | 20 | <5 per mm³ |
Monocytes | 22 | <5 per mm³ |
Differential | Yes | N/A |
RBC | 590 (High) | 0-10 per mm³ |
Tube# CSF | 1;4 | N/A |
WBC | C124, C169 | 0-10 per mm³ |
Albumin | 54 (High) | 8-37 mg/dL |
IgG synthesis rate | 12.5 (High) | <12 mg/24 hours |
IgG/albumin ratio | 0.18 | 0.066-0.270 |
Oligoclonal bands | Negative | Negative |
Oligoclonal bands number | 0 | 0 |
Meningitis encephalitis specimen type | CSF | CSF |
Escherichia coli K1 PCR | Negative | Negative |
Hemophilus influenzae PCR | Negative | Negative |
Listeria monocytogenes PCR | Negative | Negative |
Neisseria meningitidis PCR | Negative | Negative |
Streptococcus group B PCR | Negative | Negative |
Streptococcus pneumoniae PCR | Negative | Negative |
Cytomegalovirus CSF qualitative PCR | Negative | Negative |
Enterovirus RNA PCR | Negative | Negative |
Epstein-Barr virus RNA PCR | Negative | Negative |
Herpes virus 6 CSF qualitative PCR | Negative | Negative |
Herpes simplex 1 PCR | Negative | Negative |
Herpes simplex 2 PCR | Negative | Negative |
Human parechovirus PCR | Negative | Negative |
Varicella zoster PCR | Negative | Negative |
Cryptococcus neoformans gattii PCR | Negative | Negative |
Upon receiving the results of the ordered laboratory tests and imaging studies, the patient was treated with intravenous (IV) steroids, plasmapheresis, and rituximab. Initiation of treatment began with the administration of high-dose IV methylprednisolone. The patient was administered 1,000 mg/day of methylprednisolone for 3 days (total 3,000 mg; maximum suggested dosage) over four treatments per day for one hour each at a rate of 250 mg/hour every six hours. This was carried out because steroids are well proven to be a first-line agent to reduce generalized inflammation. Another treatment this patient underwent was plasmapheresis, which was performed daily during the entire hospital stay to remove any antibodies or proteins that were eliciting this immune response leading to her condition. Finally, the monoclonal antibody rituximab was given to alleviate the immune response in the patient further. As per standard protocols, Rituxan (rituximab) was administered as two 500 mg IV infusions separated by two weeks. The medication is widely known to inhibit T-helper cells, B-cells, and macrophages and induce the activity of T-regulatory cells, which help suppress the immune response.
Through the effects of the medications and treatment modalities, the patient's functioning was partially restored. The patient was able to ambulate appropriately, albeit with short distances. The episodes of incontinence completely ceased, and all paresthesia was significantly diminished. The MRI of the thoracic spine revealed a T2 signal of the spinal cord that was less intense than previously recorded. Imaging two weeks after treatment also showed a resolution of hyperintensity that was apparent on the MRI before treatment. However, the patient was advised to follow up as an outpatient with the neurologist and primary care physician five to seven days after hospital discharge. The follow-up was advised to confirm that symptoms did not return and to undergo further imaging later to ensure that positive changes were not due to ongoing plasmapheresis.
Discussion
Due to the short- and long-term neurological complications associated with COVID-19, it is of the utmost clinical significance to identify and treat potential neurological complications caused by the virus. Neurological manifestations may range from a simple headache to life-threatening encephalitis. Healthcare providers must be aware of such complications as they may be the initial presenting sign or a late manifestation of COVID-19 infection. In this case, we presented an elderly adult woman who developed TM with T2 weighted hyperintensity on the cervical to the lumbar spine. The patient's CSF analysis was consistent with laboratory findings that would be associated with viral infection of the central nervous system. While the infectious disease panel was negative for all other pathogens tested (Table 2), due to the temporal relationship between COVID-19 infection in this patient and the onset of neurological symptoms, we propose that the robust immune response produced in response to COVID-19 infection led to the neurological symptoms experienced in this patient. This pathogenesis is similar to how TM is caused in patients afflicted with more classic pathogens associated with the disease, such as the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) [11].
TM is defined as a rare inflammation of the spinal cord, which leads to numerous neurological deficits. Symptoms include but are not limited to sensory loss, rapid onset of weakness in the extremities, and bladder or bowel dysfunction. Inflammation may occur at any spinal cord level, leading to various symptoms that vary among patients. Most cases of TM are idiopathic with no predisposing factors; however, some infectious agents may also cause TM. Numerous viral agents, including the varicella-zoster virus, HIV, human T-lymphotropic virus 1 (HTLV-1), West Nile virus, and Zika virus, have been documented as causing TM. COVID-19 may be another viral etiology leading to TM in infected individuals. Mycoplasma and Treponema pallidum have also been known to cause TM. Numerous autoimmune disorders have been known to cause TM, such as Sjogren's syndrome, sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and rheumatoid arthritis. In the United States alone, there are approximately 1,400 cases of TM reported each year. The age of affected individuals varies, with the most common ages being 10-19 and 30-39 years [11].
After careful consideration and thorough evaluation of this case, we postulate that the TM experienced by this patient may be related to her SARS-CoV-2 inoculation. However, the patient's serology did test positive for CMV, HSV1, and EBV, three pathogens that have a known association with TM onset. In this case, these viruses were ruled out as the causative agents as the patient's CSF returned negative for all three pathogens, leading us to conclude that SARS-CoV-2 may be the causative agent. Two potential theories describe how SARS-CoV-2 may cause neurological complications such as TM. The first is through direct neuroinvasion in which SARS-CoV-2 infects the brain and spinal cord through its binding receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) [3]. ACE2 receptors are most abundantly found in the lung cells, leading to the upper respiratory manifestations most often seen in COVID-19-positive individuals. A literature review by Lewis et al. [12] identified 321 patients who presented with neurological complications while being infected by COVID-19. Those 321,304 patients' CSF was tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA using PCR. Seventeen patients' CSF results returned positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. While unlikely, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the CSF may be evidence of the virus's ability to cause direct neuroinvasion, which produces neurological complications in infected patients.
Furthermore, the second theory postulates that neurological manifestations caused by COVID-19 are due to an exaggerated immune response causing the spinal cord inflammation seen in acute TM [3]. The increased immune response leads to demyelination in acute TM cases. While the patient's CSF was not tested for COVID-19 using PCR, we believe that some combination of both theories of direct neuroinvasion and systemic inflammation may have led to the development of acute TM in this patient.
Conclusions
As more information becomes available regarding the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, special notes should be taken of those patients who present with nonspecific and specific neurological complications. TM can be a potentially devastating disease. If a causal relationship between acute TM and COVID-19 is established, healthcare providers should be aware of the potential implications. COVID-19 should be considered one of the many etiologies that may lead to the development of acute TM within the currently available literature. Further research should be conducted into the potential ability of SARS-CoV-2 to cause neurological damage. While not all evidence is yet available, this case should provide proof of yet another complexity due to COVID-19.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2022, Borra et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Infection with COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) is associated with a variety of generalized and specific symptoms, including neurological complications of both the peripheral and central nervous systems. In this case report, we present the case of a previously healthy 55-year-old woman who was diagnosed with transverse myelitis following a previous infection with COVID-19. MRI showed progressive demyelination of the cervical and thoracic spinal cord, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed increased levels of protein and red blood cells and no markers of infection, including negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for COVID-19 antibodies. The patient was treated with a course of methylprednisolone, multiple treatments of plasmapheresis, and ongoing treatment with rituximab, all of which were well-tolerated. She was instructed to follow up as an outpatient with the neurologist and primary care physician five to seven days after hospital discharge.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer