It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
We present a topological method for the detection and quantification of bone microstructure from non-linear microscopy images. Specifically, we analyse second harmonic generation (SHG) and two photon excited autofluorescence (TPaF) images of bone tissue which capture the distribution of matrix (fibrillar collagen) structure and autofluorescent molecules, respectively. Using persistent homology statistics with a signed Euclidean distance transform filtration on binary patches of images, we are able to quantify the number, size, distribution, and crowding of holes within and across samples imaged at the microscale. We apply our methodology to a previously characterized murine model of skeletal pathology whereby vascular endothelial growth factor expression was deleted in osteocalcin-expressing cells (OcnVEGFKO) presenting increased cortical porosity, compared to wild type (WT) littermate controls. We show significant differences in topological statistics between the OcnVEGFKO and WT groups and, when classifying the males, or females respectively, into OcnVEGFKO or WT groups, we obtain high prediction accuracies of 98.7% (74.2%) and 77.8% (65.8%) respectively for SHG (TPaF) images. The persistence statistics that we use are fully interpretable, can highlight regions of abnormality within an image and identify features at different spatial scales.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Southampton, School of Mathematical Sciences, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297)
2 University of Southampton, School of Biological Sciences, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297); University College London, Mechanical Engineering, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
3 University of Southampton, School of Biological Sciences, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297)
4 University of Southampton, School of Mathematical Sciences, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297); University of Southampton, Institute for Life Sciences, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297); The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK (GRID:grid.499548.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 5903 3632)
5 University of Southampton, School of Chemistry, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297); University of Southampton, Institute for Life Sciences, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297)