It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Identifying network architecture from observed neural activities is crucial in neuroscience studies. A key requirement is knowledge of the statistical input-output relation of single neurons in vivo. By utilizing an exact analytical solution of the spike-timing for leaky integrate-and-fire neurons under noisy inputs balanced near the threshold, we construct a framework that links synaptic type, strength, and spiking nonlinearity with the statistics of neuronal population activity. The framework explains structured pairwise and higher-order interactions of neurons receiving common inputs under different architectures. We compared the theoretical predictions with the activity of monkey and mouse V1 neurons and found that excitatory inputs given to pairs explained the observed sparse activity characterized by strong negative triple-wise interactions, thereby ruling out the alternative explanation by shared inhibition. Moreover, we showed that the strong interactions are a signature of excitatory rather than inhibitory inputs whenever the spontaneous rate is low. We present a guide map of neural interactions that help researchers to specify the hidden neuronal motifs underlying observed interactions found in empirical data.
An analytical framework linking network architecture, neuronal nonlinearity and population activity offers a guide map to infer the hidden input architecture to neural trios from observed interactions in empirical data.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), School of Cognitive Sciences, Tehran, Iran (GRID:grid.418744.a) (ISNI:0000 0000 8841 7951)
2 Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), School of Physics, Tehran, Iran (GRID:grid.418744.a) (ISNI:0000 0000 8841 7951); University of Guilan, Department of Physics, Rasht, Iran (GRID:grid.411872.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2087 2250)
3 University of Tehran, Control and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, Tehran, Iran (GRID:grid.46072.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 0612 7950)
4 Kyoto University, Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto, Japan (GRID:grid.258799.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0372 2033); Hokkaido University, Center for Human Nature, Artificial Intelligence, and Neuroscience (CHAIN), Hokkaido, Japan (GRID:grid.39158.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 7691)