It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Heterogeneity in Parkinson’s disease (PD) presents a barrier to understanding disease mechanisms and developing new treatments. This challenge may be partially overcome by stratifying patients into clinically meaningful subtypes. A recent subtyping scheme classifies de novo PD patients into three subtypes: mild-motor predominant, intermediate, or diffuse-malignant, based on motor impairment, cognitive function, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) symptoms, and autonomic symptoms. We aimed to validate this approach in a large longitudinal cohort of early-to-moderate PD (n = 499) by assessing the influence of subtyping on clinical characteristics at baseline and on two-year progression. Compared to mild-motor predominant patients (42%), diffuse-malignant patients (12%) showed involvement of more clinical domains, more diffuse hypokinetic-rigid motor symptoms (decreased lateralization and hand/foot focality), and faster two-year progression. These findings extend the classification of diffuse-malignant and mild-motor predominant subtypes to early-to-moderate PD and suggest that different pathophysiological mechanisms (focal versus diffuse cerebral propagation) may underlie distinct subtype classifications.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Radboud University, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5590.9) (ISNI:0000000122931605); Radboud University, Centre for Medical Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5590.9) (ISNI:0000000122931605); Radboud University Medical Center, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.10417.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 0444 9382)
2 Radboud University, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5590.9) (ISNI:0000000122931605)
3 Radboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5590.9) (ISNI:0000000122931605); Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical Psychology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.10417.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 0444 9382); Radboud University Medical Center, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.10417.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 0444 9382); Vincent van Gogh Institute for Psychiatry, Venray, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.418157.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0501 6079)
4 Radboud University Medical Center, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.10417.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 0444 9382)