It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Recent growth in digital technologies has enabled the recruitment and monitoring of large and diverse populations in remote health studies. However, the generalizability of inference drawn from remotely collected health data could be severely impacted by uneven participant engagement and attrition over the course of the study. We report findings on long-term participant retention and engagement patterns in a large multinational observational digital study for depression containing active (surveys) and passive sensor data collected via Android smartphones, and Fitbit devices from 614 participants for up to 2 years. Majority of participants (67.6%) continued to remain engaged in the study after 43 weeks. Unsupervised clustering of participants’ study apps and Fitbit usage data showed 3 distinct engagement subgroups for each data stream. We found: (i) the least engaged group had the highest depression severity (4 PHQ8 points higher) across all data streams; (ii) the least engaged group (completed 4 bi-weekly surveys) took significantly longer to respond to survey notifications (3.8 h more) and were 5 years younger compared to the most engaged group (completed 20 bi-weekly surveys); and (iii) a considerable proportion (44.6%) of the participants who stopped completing surveys after 8 weeks continued to share passive Fitbit data for significantly longer (average 42 weeks). Additionally, multivariate survival models showed participants’ age, ownership and brand of smartphones, and recruitment sites to be associated with retention in the study. Together these findings could inform the design of future digital health studies to enable equitable and balanced data collection from diverse populations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details














1 Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764)
2 Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764); Krembil Center for Neuroinformatics, CAMH, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.155956.b) (ISNI:0000 0000 8793 5925); University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938); University of Washington, Seattle, USA (GRID:grid.34477.33) (ISNI:0000000122986657); Davos Alzheimer’s Collaborative, Geneva, Switzerland (GRID:grid.34477.33)
3 Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764); University College London, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201); South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (GRID:grid.37640.36) (ISNI:0000 0000 9439 0839); University College London, Health Data Research UK London, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
4 Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764); University of Sussex, Falmer, School of Psychology, East Sussex, UK (GRID:grid.12082.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7590)
5 Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Titusville, USA (GRID:grid.497530.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0389 4927)
6 Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Psychiatry and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.12380.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1754 9227)
7 Universitat de Barcelona, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.5841.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0247)
8 King’s College London, RADAR-CNS Patient Advisory Board, London, UK (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764); The Romanian League for Mental Health, Bucharest, Romania (GRID:grid.13097.3c)
9 Northwestern University, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Department of Preventative Medicine, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.16753.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2299 3507)
10 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7884)
11 Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764); South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (GRID:grid.37640.36) (ISNI:0000 0000 9439 0839)
12 H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark (GRID:grid.424580.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0476 7612)
13 Davos Alzheimer’s Collaborative, Geneva, Switzerland (GRID:grid.424580.f); Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Titusville, USA (GRID:grid.497530.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0389 4927)