It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Identifying the cerebral arterial branches is essential for undertaking a computational approach to cerebrovascular imaging. However, the complexity and inter-individual differences involved in this process have not been thoroughly studied. We used machine learning to examine the anatomical profile of the cerebral arterial tree. The method is less sensitive to inter-subject and cohort-wise anatomical variations and exhibits robust performance with an unprecedented in-depth vessel range. We applied machine learning algorithms to disease-free healthy control subjects (n = 42), patients with stroke with intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) (n = 46), and patients with stroke mixed with the existing controls (n = 69). We trained and tested 70% and 30% of each study cohort, respectively, incorporating spatial coordinates and geometric vessel feature vectors. Cerebral arterial images were analyzed based on the ‘segmentation-stacking’ method using magnetic resonance angiography. We precisely classified the cerebral arteries across the exhaustive scope of vessel components using advanced geometric characterization, redefinition of vessel unit conception, and post-processing algorithms. We verified that the neural network ensemble, with multiple joint models as the combined predictor, classified all vessel component types independent of inter-subject variations in cerebral arterial anatomy. The validity of the categorization performance of the model was tested, considering the control, ICAS, and control-blended stroke cohorts, using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and precision-recall curve. The classification accuracy rarely fell outside each image’s 90–99% scope, independent of cohort-dependent cerebrovascular structural variations. The classification ensemble was calibrated with high overall area rates under the ROC curve of 0.99–1.00 [0.97–1.00] in the test set across various study cohorts. Identifying an all-inclusive range of vessel components across controls, ICAS, and stroke patients, the accuracy rates of the prediction were: internal carotid arteries, 91–100%; middle cerebral arteries, 82–98%; anterior cerebral arteries, 88–100%; posterior cerebral arteries, 87–100%; and collections of superior, anterior inferior, and posterior inferior cerebellar arteries, 90–99% in the chunk-level classification. Using a voting algorithm on the queued classified vessel factors and anatomically post-processing the automatically classified results intensified quantitative prediction performance. We employed stochastic clustering and deep neural network ensembles. Ma-chine intelligence-assisted prediction of vessel structure allowed us to personalize quantitative predictions of various types of cerebral arterial structures, contributing to precise and efficient decisions regarding the cerebrovascular disease.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.264381.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 989X); Seoul National University, Program in Brain Science, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.31501.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5905)
2 Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.264381.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 989X)
3 Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.264381.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 989X); Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.264381.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 989X)
4 Konyang University, Department of Medical Artificial Intelligence, Daejeon, Korea (GRID:grid.411143.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 8674 9741)
5 Yonsei University Mirae Campus, Division of Digital Healthcare, Wonju, Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454)
6 Sungkyunkwan University, Department of Electronic Electrical and Computer Engineering, Suwon, Korea (GRID:grid.264381.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 989X); Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Suwon, Korea (GRID:grid.410720.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 1784 4496)
7 UCLA, Department of Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.19006.3e) (ISNI:0000 0000 9632 6718)