INTRODUCTION
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, followed by breast and lung cancer.1 The incidence of CRC has been decreasing in some countries,2–4 but not in Japan.5,6 In 2017, 153,193 patients were diagnosed with CRC, which became the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in 2019 (13.7%) in Japan.5 Diet is among the established lifestyle factors affecting the risk of CRC, which also include smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, and physical inactivity.7,8
N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are fatty acids containing more than one double bond in their chemical structure, with the first double bond occurring on the third carbon from the methyl carbon end.9 According to the length of the carbon chain, n-3 PUFAs with 18-carbon atoms include alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), which is derived mainly from plant oils, and n-3 PUFAs with 20 or more carbon atoms include eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosapentaenoic acid (DPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), which are derived from marine oils.9
The anti-inflammatory and anticarcinogenic effects of n-3 PUFAs support the hypothesis that n-3 PUFAs could protect against cancer risk, including CRC.10 Recently, a large European cohort study on marine-derived n-3 PUFAs intake and CRC risk was conducted.11 Subsequently, a meta-analysis reported that high blood n-3 PUFA levels decreased CRC risk, and dietary n-3 PUFA intake tended to be inversely associated with CRC risk.12 In that meta-analysis, dietary ALA intake was not associated with CRC risk. The evidence on the effect of plant-derived n-3 PUFA (ALA) and anatomical subsite-specific CRC is limited.13,14
In this study, we aimed to determine the association between dietary n-3 PUFAs intake and CRC risk in a large-scale cohort study of cancer risk in Asia. We hypothesized different associations by anatomical subsite because the colon cancer risk varies by anatomical subsite due to different embryological and physiological features,15 and by specific n-3 PUFAs due to different sources and chemical structures.9
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study population
The Japan Collaborative Cohort Study for Evaluation of Cancer Risk (JACC) study was established in the late 1980s. Details of the JACC study are described in a previous publication.16 In summary, a sample of 110,585 residents from 45 administrative districts in Japan (46,395 men and 64,190 women) aged 40–79 years at baseline (between 1988 and 1990) participated in municipal health screening examinations. Participants completed self-administered questionnaires containing questions related to their lifestyle and medical history. Individual informed consent was obtained in 36 areas, and group consent was obtained from the area leader (which was common in Japan before the Japanese government first established the ethical guidelines in 200217) in the remaining nine areas prior to study participation. Depending on the guideline for Informed Consent in Epidemiologic Research,18 proposed by the research group funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the appropriateness of the entire study was ethically reviewed and approved by the Ethical Board of the Nagoya University School of Medicine in 2000. Subsequently, the study was approved by the Ethical Board of Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine. In general, the JACC study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Our analysis included only 65,042 participants because the data on cancer incidence were collected in 24 of the 45 areas from population-based cancer registers or by reviewing the records of major local hospitals. Furthermore, 972 participants with a previous history of cancer at baseline and 21,534 participants without dietary data were excluded. The remaining 42,536 participants were included in the final analysis. The included participants were younger; had a lower prevalence of men, smoking, and a history of diabetes mellitus; and had a higher prevalence of drinking, walking, sedentary work, higher education, and family history of CRC than the participants excluded from the analysis (Supporting Information Table S1). Therefore, the CRC risk profile was unlikely to differ materially between the included and excluded participants.
Assessment of dietary intake
Food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used at baseline to obtain information on the intake of various food items. The FFQ included 33 food items with five multiple-choice responses: almost never, 1–2 times/month, 1–2 times/week, 3–4 times/week, and almost daily. The responses were rated as follows: 0 (0/30 days), 0.05 (1.5/30 days), 0.214 (1.5/7 days), 0.5 (3.5/7 days), and 1.0 (30/30 days), respectively. The dietary intake of n-3 PUFAs (total n-3 PUFA, EPA, DPA, DHA, and ALA) was computed using the fifth edition of the Japan Food Tables to measure the amount of n-3 PUFAs in each food. These contents were multiplied by the participants' scores for each food item, and then, the contents were summed. The portion size of the FFQ food items was estimated based on the intake reported by a subsample of the JACC study in a validation study.19 The n-3 PUFA intakes from the FFQ [mean (SD) = 5.0 (0.9) mg/day] was validated against that estimated from 12-day dietary records [mean (SD) = 10.0 (1.7) mg/day] in the validation study with a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient of 0.21 (p = 0.058).19 Data on supplementation (e.g., fish oil supplement) was not included in the survey; however, supplement use was uncommon among the Japanese population at baseline. The energy-adjusted nutrient intake was computed using the residual method.20
Ascertainment of colorectal cancer
CRC cases were defined using the codes C18 to C20, as stated in the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10). Colon cancer was defined using CRC code C18. Colon cancer was further classified by subsite: C18.0 to C18.5 for proximal colon cancer and C18.6 and 18.7 for distal colon cancer. The codes C18.8 and C18.9 were not used for further classification by subsite because they were overlapping sites and were unspecified by subsite. C19 and C20 codes were used to define rectal cancer.
Statistical analysis
The person-years of follow-up were computed from the baseline (1988–1990) to the first censoring, which included death, moving out of the study area, diagnosis of any cancer, or termination of the follow-up. Participants who moved out of the study area were considered censored cases because the incidence rates after such moves could not be followed in our system. The follow-up was terminated in 2009 in most areas. However, this treatment was discontinued in some areas before 2009. The lowest consumption category in quartiles (Q1) of each n-3 PUFA energy-adjusted intake for all participants was regarded as the reference. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CRC, colon cancer, proximal colon cancer, distal colon cancer, and rectal cancer were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. The confounding variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI; <18.5 kg/m2, 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2, or ≥25.0 kg/ m2), smoking status (never smoker, former smoker, current smoker of 1–19 cigarettes/day, or current smoker of ≥20 cigarettes/day), alcohol intake (never drinker, former drinker, current drinker of <2 Japanese drinks [46 g ethanol]/day, or of ≥2 Japanese drinks/day), walking duration (walking <30 min/day or ≥30 min/day), sports duration (sports <1 h/week or ≥1 h/week), education (attended school at ages ≤18 years or >18 years), sedentary work (yes or no), family CRC history in parents or siblings (yes or no), diabetes history (yes or no), and quartiles of energy, calcium, iron, saturated fatty acids, and fiber intake. Missing values for all covariates were grouped into an additional category and included in the model. In the sensitivity analyses, the HRs for any observed significant associations were calculated after excluding participants who had been diagnosed with CRC within the first 3, 5, or 10 years of follow-up. SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used to perform all analyses. Statistical significance was set at p-value <0.05.
RESULTS
Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of the participants according to quartiles of total n-3 PUFA, marine n-3 PUFA, and ALA intake. The mean intake was 927 mg/day in the lowest quartile (Q1) and 2143 mg/day in the highest quartile (Q4) for total n-3 PUFA; 280 mg/day and 1031 mg/day Q4 for marine n-3 PUFA; and 480 mg/day and 1113 mg/day for ALA, respectively. Total n-3 PUFA intake was positively associated with age, walking, and the selected nutrient intakes and inversely associated with being men, smoking, drinking, and sedentary work. Similar trends were observed for marine n-3 PUFA and ALA intakes.
TABLE 1 Risk characteristics of participants at baseline according to quartiles of total n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid, marine n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid, and alpha-linolenic acid intakea
Quartile of total n-3 PUFA intakeb | Quartile of marine n-3 PUFA intakeb,c | Quartile of ALA intakeb | |||||||||||
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||
Dietary intake | (mg/day) | 927±326 | 1202±312 | 1536±314 | 2143±439 | 280±119 | 428±124 | 638±153 | 1031±214 | 480±149 | 647±175 | 814±164 | 1113±243 |
No. of participants | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | |
Age | (year) | 55.2±9.9 | 56.2±10.2 | 56.7±10.1 | 57.7±9.7 | 55.9±10.2 | 56.3±10.2 | 56.3±10.0 | 57.3±9.5 | 55.1±9.6 | 56.0±10.0 | 56.7±10.0 | 58.2±10.1 |
Body mass index | (kg/m2) | 22.8±3.1 | 22.8±2.9 | 22.7±3.0 | 22.9±3.6 | 22.8±3.1 | 22.8±3.0 | 22.8±3.3 | 22.9±3.2 | 22.9±3.1 | 22.7±3.2 | 22.7±3.0 | 22.9±3.4 |
Men | (%) | 54.8 | 36.9 | 33.6 | 30.2 | 51.7 | 37.3 | 34.2 | 32.3 | 53.2 | 38.1 | 33.6 | 30.1 |
Current smoker | (%) | 34.7 | 22.5 | 19.9 | 17.6 | 31.7 | 22.6 | 20.8 | 19.7 | 34.7 | 23.3 | 20.0 | 16.8 |
Regular drinker (≥46 g ethanol/day) | (%) | 55.3 | 40.2 | 37.1 | 33.0 | 50.6 | 39.7 | 37.7 | 37.8 | 56.5 | 42.4 | 36.8 | 30.0 |
Daily walking time (≥30 min/day) | (%) | 68.4 | 70.1 | 71.7 | 72.4 | 70.3 | 70.2 | 70.6 | 71.3 | 67.4 | 69.1 | 72.4 | 73.9 |
Sports (≥1 h/week) | (%) | 26.1 | 26.5 | 28.3 | 27.7 | 26.5 | 27.6 | 27.1 | 27.4 | 25.2 | 27.0 | 28.3 | 28.2 |
Sedentary work | (%) | 16.9 | 16.7 | 15.9 | 13.9 | 16.1 | 17.1 | 16.1 | 14.4 | 16.7 | 17.4 | 15.9 | 13.3 |
Education (ages >18 years) | (%) | 15.5 | 15.1 | 14.3 | 14.4 | 15.1 | 14.5 | 14.2 | 15.5 | 14.9 | 16.3 | 14.6 | 13.3 |
History of diabetes mellitus | (%) | 5.4 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 5.4 | 5.8 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 4.4 |
Family history of colorectal cancer | (%) | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
Energy | (kcal/day) | 1588±472 | 1439±419 | 1482±410 | 1588±405 | 1598±452 | 1432±412 | 1487±439 | 1580±402 | 1580±474 | 1457±427 | 1476±395 | 1585±414 |
Calcium intake | (mg/day) | 381±141 | 431±138 | 480±137 | 552±145 | 421±151 | 435±146 | 466±147 | 521±152 | 367±136 | 432±133 | 481±131 | 564±143 |
Iron intake | (mg/day) | 576±194 | 655±190 | 744±191 | 875±212 | 649±217 | 662±209 | 723±216 | 815±224 | 554±183 | 647±182 | 746±177 | 901±201 |
Saturated fatty acids intake | (mg/day) | 870±349 | 937±342 | 1019±342 | 1168±375 | 915±367 | 946±352 | 1011±350 | 1121±375 | 864±342 | 951±336 | 1008±338 | 1170±390 |
Total dietary fiber intake | (g/day) | 10.6±3.3 | 11.3±3.3 | 12.4±3.3 | 14.1±3.5 | 11.8±3.6 | 11.4±3.5 | 12.1±3.5 | 13.2±3.6 | 10.0±3.1 | 11.1±3.0 | 12.5±2.9 | 14.9±3.3 |
In the 585,644 person-years of follow-up (median years = 13.8) of the 42,536 participants, 699 patients developed CRC, including 462 with colon cancer (204 proximal colon, 187 distal colon cancer, and 71 overlapping or unspecified subsite cases) and 237 with rectal cancer.
Table 2 shows the HRs for the quartiles of the total n-3 PUFA intake. No association was found between total n-3 PUFA and CRC, colon cancer (both entire colon and colon by subsite), or rectal cancer.
TABLE 2 Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of colorectal cancer incidence according to quartiles of total n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake
Quartile of total n-3 PUFA intakea | ||||||||
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | p for trend | ||||
No. of participants | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | ||||
Person-years | 130,614 | 141,366 | 151,573 | 162,192 | ||||
Colorectal cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 157 | 174 | 184 | 184 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 1.08 | (0.87–1.34) | 1.07 | (0.86–1.32) | 0.99 | (0.80–1.23) | 0.85 |
Multivariable HRb | 1.00 | 1.20 | (0.95–1.52) | 1.22 | (0.95–1.57) | 1.11 | (0.84–1.46) | 0.55 |
Colon cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 104 | 111 | 127 | 120 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 0.99 | (0.76–1.30) | 1.05 | (0.80–1.36) | 0.91 | (0.69–1.19) | 0.54 |
Multivariable HRb | 1.00 | 1.16 | (0.87–1.55) | 1.29 | (0.95–1.75) | 1.11 | (0.79–1.56) | 0.51 |
Proximal colon cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 38 | 48 | 56 | 62 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 1.09 | (0.71–1.67) | 1.14 | (0.75–1.74) | 1.13 | (0.75–1.71) | 0.56 |
Multivariable HRb | 1.00 | 1.25 | (0.79–1.98) | 1.42 | (0.88–2.30) | 1.40 | (0.83–2.36) | 0.22 |
Distal colon cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 56 | 42 | 52 | 37 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 0.77 | (0.52–1.16) | 0.90 | (0.61–1.33) | 0.61 | (0.40–0.94) | 0.06 |
Multivariable HRb | 1.00 | 0.84 | (0.55–1.30) | 1.03 | (0.66–1.60) | 0.68 | (0.40–1.16) | 0.30 |
Rectal cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 53 | 63 | 57 | 64 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 1.27 | (0.88–1.83) | 1.10 | (0.75–1.61) | 1.18 | (0.81–1.71) | 0.59 |
Multivariable HRb | 1.00 | 1.29 | (0.87–1.92) | 1.09 | (0.71–1.69) | 1.13 | (0.70–1.80) | 0.87 |
Marine n-3 PUFA intake (combined with EPA, DPA, and DHA) was not associated with CRC at any anatomical subsite (Table 3).
TABLE 3 Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of colorectal cancer incidence according to quartiles of marine n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake
Quartile of marine n-3 PUFA intakea | ||||||||
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | p for trend | ||||
No. of participants | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | ||||
Person-years | 139,482 | 143,172 | 147,961 | 155,129 | ||||
Colorectal cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 171 | 173 | 162 | 193 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 1.05 | (0.85–1.30) | 0.97 | (0.78–1.20) | 1.09 | (0.88–1.34) | 0.62 |
Multivariable HRb | 1.00 | 1.06 | (0.86–1.32) | 0.97 | (0.77–1.21) | 1.07 | (0.86–1.34) | 0.75 |
Colon cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 112 | 114 | 105 | 131 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 1.03 | (0.79–1.33) | 0.92 | (0.70–1.20) | 1.08 | (0.83–1.39) | 0.75 |
Multivariable HRb | 1.00 | 1.03 | (0.79–1.35) | 0.94 | (0.71–1.24) | 1.09 | (0.83–1.43) | 0.69 |
Proximal colon cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 41 | 49 | 55 | 59 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 1.14 | (0.75–1.73) | 1.24 | (0.82–1.86) | 1.22 | (0.82–1.83) | 0.31 |
Multivariable HRb | 1.00 | 1.17 | (0.77–1.78) | 1.28 | (0.84–1.96) | 1.25 | (0.81–1.92) | 0.30 |
Distal colon cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 54 | 50 | 33 | 50 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 1.01 | (0.68–1.48) | 0.65 | (0.42–1.00) | 0.95 | (0.65–1.41) | 0.41 |
Multivariable HRb | 1.00 | 0.98 | (0.66–1.46) | 0.64 | (0.41–1.00) | 0.94 | (0.62–1.43) | 0.41 |
Rectal cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 59 | 59 | 57 | 62 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 1.11 | (0.77–1.59) | 1.06 | (0.74–1.53) | 1.10 | (0.77–1.58) | 0.66 |
Multivariable HRb | 1.00 | 1.13 | (0.78–1.63) | 1.02 | (0.70–1.49) | 1.04 | (0.70–1.53) | 0.99 |
Table 4 shows the HRs for the ALA intake quartiles. No associations were observed between ALA and overall CRC risk; however, ALA intake was inversely associated with distal colon cancer risk in a dose-dependent manner [HR (95%CI) for Q2:0.93 (0.60–1.43), Q3:0.76 (0.44–1.29), and Q4:0.41 (0.21–0.81), p for trend = 0.01].
TABLE 4 Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of colorectal cancer incidence according to quartiles of alpha-linolenic acid intake
Quartile of ALA intakea | ||||||||
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | p for trend | ||||
No. of participants | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | 10,634 | ||||
Person-years | 127,096 | 139,111 | 154,211 | 165,326 | ||||
Colorectal cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 167 | 174 | 172 | 186 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 0.98 | (0.80–1.22) | 0.87 | (0.70–1.08) | 0.85 | (0.69–1.06) | 0.09 |
Multivariable HRb | 1.00 | 1.11 | (0.87–1.42) | 1.06 | (0.79–1.42) | 0.97 | (0.69–1.36) | 0.75 |
Colon cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 113 | 116 | 117 | 116 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 0.93 | (0.72–1.21) | 0.82 | (0.63–1.07) | 0.72 | (0.55–0.94) | 0.01 |
Multivariable HRb | 1.00 | 1.10 | (0.81–1.48) | 1.07 | (0.75–1.52) | 0.85 | (0.56–1.29) | 0.43 |
Proximal colon cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 39 | 49 | 52 | 64 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 1.07 | (0.70–1.63) | 0.96 | (0.63–1.47) | 1.02 | (0.68–1.54) | 0.94 |
Multivariable HRb | 1.00 | 1.25 | (0.77–2.01) | 1.32 | (0.75–2.31) | 1.43 | (0.76–2.69) | 0.31 |
Distal colon cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 58 | 52 | 45 | 32 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 0.88 | (0.60–1.28) | 0.70 | (0.47–1.04) | 0.46 | (0.30–0.72) | <0.001 |
Multivariable HRb | 1.00 | 0.93 | (0.60–1.43) | 0.76 | (0.44–1.29) | 0.41 | (0.21–0.81) | 0.01 |
Rectal cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 54 | 58 | 55 | 70 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 1.10 | (0.76–1.60) | 0.98 | (0.67–1.43) | 1.17 | (0.81–1.69) | 0.52 |
Multivariable HRb | 1.00 | 1.13 | (0.74–1.74) | 1.05 | (0.63–1.73) | 1.24 | (0.70–2.19) | 0.55 |
The results remained unchanged after excluding distal colon cancer cases diagnosed within 3, 5, or 10 years from the baseline; the HRs (95% CIs) after excluding cases that developed during the first 5 years from the baseline were as follows: Q2, 0.86 (0.48–1.53); Q3, 0.54 (0.26–1.10); and Q4, 0.23 (0.09–0.56) (p for trend = 0.001). The respective HRs (95% CIs) after excluding incident cases within the first 10 years were as follows: Q2, 1.02 (0.46–2.27); Q3, 0.67 (0.24–1.86); and Q4, 0.44 (0.12–1.54) (p for trend = 0.18) (Table 5).
TABLE 5 Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of distal colon cancer incidence according to quartiles of alpha-linolenic acid intake after exclusion of the incidence within 3, 5, and 10 years from the baseline
Quartile of ALA intakea | ||||||||
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | p for trend | ||||
Exclude 3 years | ||||||||
Dietary intake (mg/day)b | 481 ± 180 | 648 ± 175 | 815 ± 164 | 1115 ± 244 | ||||
No. of participants | 10,329 | 10,329 | 10,330 | 10,329 | ||||
Person-years | 126,787 | 139,022 | 153,807 | 164,258 | ||||
Distal colon cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 47 | 42 | 35 | 27 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 0.87 | (0.57–1.32) | 0.66 | (0.42–1.03) | 0.48 | (0.29–0.77) | 0.001 |
Multivariable HRc | 1.00 | 0.87 | (0.54–1.41) | 0.65 | (0.36–1.19) | 0.38 | (0.18–0.79) | 0.01 |
Exclude 5 years | ||||||||
Dietary intake (mg/day)b | 497 ± 183 | 670 ± 176 | 832 ± 165 | 1129 ± 243 | ||||
No. of participants | 9290 | 9290 | 9291 | 9290 | ||||
Person-years | 126,871 | 137,730 | 147,115 | 152,873 | ||||
Distal colon cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 31 | 33 | 27 | 17 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 1.02 | (0.62–1.68) | 0.79 | (0.46–1.34) | 0.48 | (0.26–0.89) | 0.01 |
Multivariable HRc | 1.00 | 0.86 | (0.48–1.53) | 0.54 | (0.26–1.10) | 0.23 | (0.09–0.56) | 0.001 |
Exclude 10 years | ||||||||
Dietary intake (mg/day)b | 512 ± 185 | 698 ± 175 | 853 ± 165 | 1148 ± 243 | ||||
No. of participants | 7823 | 7824 | 7824 | 7823 | ||||
Person-years | 126,286 | 130,669 | 133,727 | 135,411 | ||||
Distal colon cancer | ||||||||
No. of cases | 15 | 17 | 12 | 9 | ||||
Age- and sex-adjusted HR | 1.00 | 1.12 | (0.56–2.27) | 0.77 | (0.35–1.69) | 0.60 | (0.26–1.40) | 0.16 |
Multivariable HRc | 1.00 | 1.02 | (0.46–2.27) | 0.67 | (0.24–1.86) | 0.44 | (0.12–1.54) | 0.18 |
No significant sex interaction was observed in analyses for Tables 2–5.
DISCUSSION
In this large prospective study of a Japanese population, dietary intake of ALA was inversely associated with distal colon cancer risk in a dose-dependent manner. After excluding the diagnosed distal colon cancer cases that occurred within 3, 5, and 10 years of baseline, the observed association remained unchanged. Dietary intakes of marine n-3 PUFA and total n-3 PUFA were, however, not associated with the risk of CRC at any subsites.
As only a small proportion of ALA can be transformed into EPA and DHA in the human body,21,22 ALA per se may reduce the risk of distal colon cancer. The beneficial effects of ALA include reduction of aberrant crypt foci in the colon,23–25 induction of apoptosis,26,27 and inhibition of proliferation, adhesion, and invasion of cancer cells.28 In rats, flaxseed oil, rich in ALA, inhibited inflammation and led to a reduction in tumorous lesions in the intestine and pancreas.29
Previous studies evaluating the association between ALA intake and CRC risk have yielded inconsistent findings. A previous Japanese prospective study showed no associations between dietary ALA intake and colon cancer risk; the multivariable relative risks (95% CIs) for the highest (median: 2760 mg/day in men and 2640 mg/day in women) quintiles of intake were 0.84 (0.56–1.28) (p for trend = 0.31) in men and 1.01 (0.65–1.57) (p for trend = 0.69) in women compared with that for the lowest (median: 1210 mg/day in men and 1350 mg/day in women) quintiles of intake.13 In that study, the association between ALA intake and the risk of distal colon cancer was analyzed only for invasive cancers, defined as tumors over the mucosal layer. A previous prospective study conducted in the United States (US) in 123,529 health professionals aged 40–75 years and nurses aged 30–55 years with 24 to 26 years of follow-up also showed no association between dietary ALA intake and the risk of CRC, proximal colon, and distal colon cancer. The multivariable HRs (95% CIs) of CRC for the highest (≥1300 mg/day in men and ≥1200 mg/day in women) quartiles were 0.89 (0.70–1.13) (p for trend = 0.45) in men and 1.05 (0.86–1.29) (p for trend = 0.56) in women compared with those for the lowest (<900 mg/day both in men and in women) quartiles. The respective multivariable HRs (95% CIs) of proximal colon cancer were 0.81 (0.70–1.13) (p for trend = 0.45) in men and 1.04 (0.78–1.40) (p for trend = 0.89) in women. The respective multivariable HRs (95% CIs) of distal colon cancer were 1.15 (0.75–1.75) (p for trend = 0.39) in men and 1.18 (0.81–1.71) (p for trend = 0.25) in women.14
In contrast, some prospective studies investigating the association between dietary ALA intake and CRC risk reported a positive trend.30–33 A 22-year prospective study of 4967 Caucasians aged ≥55 years in Rotterdam, Netherlands, reported that dietary n-3 PUFA from non-fish sources was associated with an increased risk of CRC, with the HR (95% CI) for the highest (median:1400 mg/day) tertile of 1.76 (1.25–2.47) (p for trend = 0.001) compared with that for the lowest (median:700 mg/day) tertile.30 Another 6-year follow-up study on American individuals aged 50–74 years (97% of participants were white34) revealed a non-significant positive association between dietary ALA intake and CRC risk among women. The multivariable HR (95% CI) for the highest (≥1190 mg/day) quartile of ALA was 1.38 (1.02–1.85) (p for trend = 0.13) compared with that for the lowest (<780 mg/day) quartile of ALA intake, and a non-significant inverse association was observed between dietary ALA intake and the risk of CRC among men.31 The multivariable HR (95% CI) for the highest (≥1260 mg/day) quartile of ALA intake was 0.87 (0.66–1.14) (p for trend = 0.09) compared with that for the lowest (<820 mg/day) quartile of ALA intake among men.31 According to a 20-year prospective study of 48,223 Swedish women aged 29–49 years, the multivariable HRs (95% CIs) of CRC and colon cancer for the highest (≥1160 mg/day) quartile of ALA intake were 1.17 (0.86–1.59) (p for trend = 0.112) and 0.95 (0.65–1.41) (p for trend = 0.833), respectively, compared with that for the lowest (<840 mg/day) quartile of ALA.32 An 11-year prospective study of 59,986 Chinese men aged 40–74 years showed that the multivariable HRs (95% CIs) of CRC and colon cancer for the highest quartiles of ALA were 1.15 (0.92–1.43) (p for trend = 0.18) and 0.98 (0.74–1.31) (p for trend = 0.82), respectively, compared with that for the lowest quartile of ALA intake (amount of intake was not reported).33 In our study, the mean ALA intakes in the highest and lowest quartiles were 1175 and 525 mg/day among men and 1086 and 429 mg/day among women, respectively. The distribution of ALA intake in our study did not differ materially from those reported in previous studies.
The disparity between our study and previous studies that reported a positive trend may be due to the different dietary sources and different age distributions, shorter follow-up period, and lack of information on the anatomical subsite of CRC in previous studies. For example, the primary sources of non-marine n-3 PUFAs associated with a higher risk of CRC30 in the Rotterdam study were butter and margarine.35 However, ALA is also present in flaxseed, canola, and soybean oils,22 among which soybeans are common in Japanese foods.36
Our results indicate an inverse association between dietary ALA intake and CRC risk only in patients with distal colon cancer. In rats, the incidence of aberrant crypt foci in the distal colon was higher than that in the proximal colon,25 and the number of aberrant crypt foci was reduced in the distal colon by flaxseed intake (rich in ALA) compared to that in the proximal colon.23,24 In addition, the mucosa of the distal colon has a higher apoptotic index than that of the proximal colonic.15
In our study, no association was found between marine n-3 PUFA intake and CRC risk, including in distal colon cancer. However, a US study conducted among health professionals and nurses suggested a positive association between marine n-3 PUFA intake and the risk of distal colon cancer, with the multivariable HRs (95% CIs) in the highest quartiles of intake being 1.43 (0.97–2.11) among men and 1.36 (1.03–1.80) among women compared with those in the lowest quartiles of intake.14 The discrepancy between the findings from the US and our studies may be due to a large difference in the distribution of marine n-3 PUFA intake; the highest quartiles among the US men (562 mg/day) and women (412 mg/day)14 corresponded to that between the second and third quartiles among Japanese men (473 and 710 mg/day) and that in the second quartile among Japanese women (402 mg/day) in our study. The high mean levels of marine n-3 PUFA intake were observed across middle-aged and older Japanese; 595 mg/day for the ages of 40–64 and 588 mg/day for the ages of 65–79 among men, and 603 mg/day and 568 mg/day, respectively, among women.
Moreover, no association was observed between marine n-3 PUFA intake and risk of proximal colon cancer. Meanwhile, a previous Japanese study revealed a protective effect of marine n-3 PUFA intake against invasive proximal colon cancer, with multivariable relative risks being 0.35 (0.14–0.88) among men and 0.59 (0.24–1.45) among women in the highest quintile compared with that in the lowest quintile.13 Furthermore, a recent report of the US health professionals and nurses' study revealed that a high marine n-3 PUFA intake was associated with a lower risk of FOXP3 + T-cell-high CRC; the multivariable HRs (95% CIs) in the highest quartile were 0.57 (0.40–0.81, p for trend<0.001) for FOXP3 + T-cell-high CRC and 1.14 (0.81–1.60, p for trend = 0.77) for FOXP3 + T-cell-low CRC compared with those in the lowest quartile.37 The potency of marine n-3 PUFA in proximal colon cancer may differ depending on the invasion levels and immune infiltrate of cancer; however, future research is needed to confirm this finding.
The strengths of our study were as follows: the prospective nature of the study, which avoided the occurrence of exposure recall bias; its large sample size with high follow-up rates; and the informative analyses under sufficient quality of the cancer registry, which reduced the misclassification of outcomes. In addition, our study results were not affected by reverse causation because of the similar trend before and after excluding the early diagnosis of dietary ALA intake.
Our study had several limitations. First, although we adjusted for multiple potential confounders, some confounding and other unmeasured factors, such as the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, are suggested to reduce the CRC risk due to its anti-inflammatory effect38; however, they remain unaccounted for. Second, dietary assessment using the FFQ is subject to recall bias, differences in the nutrient content of foods, and inability to capture the absorption and metabolism of PUFAs by the questionnaire. Furthermore, the data on n-3 PUFAs intake obtained using the FFQ were available only at baseline; hence, it did not reflect the possible changes in the participants' dietary habits during the follow-up period; however, such changes would have occurred randomly. Third, because we did not have information on the histological depth of CRC, the HRs depending on the invasion level could not be estimated.
In conclusion, our findings provide evidence that a high ALA intake is associated with a lower risk of distal colon cancer in a dose-dependent manner. Further studies focusing on the health benefits of ALA intake on CRC risk are warranted.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Ayako Kato, Chika Okada, and Hiroyasu Iso designed the study and methods of the analyses. Ayako Kato and Chika Okada analyzed the data. Ayako Kato drafted the manuscript. Ehab S Eshak, Hiroyasu Iso, and Akiko Tamakoshi provided a critical review of the content. Akiko Tamakoshi and Hiroyasu Iso coordinated the research. All authors approved the final manuscript.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The JACC Study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT) (Monbusho); Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas of Cancer; and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas of Cancer Epidemiology from MEXT (Monbukagakusho) (Nos. 61010076, 62010074, 63010074, 1010068, 2151065, 3151064, 4151063, 5151069, 6279102, 11181101, 17015022, 18014011, 20014026, 20390156, and 26293138); Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Health and Labor Sciences research grants, Japan (Research on Health Services: H17-Kenkou-007; Comprehensive Research on Cardiovascular Disease and Life-Related Disease: H18-Junkankitou [Seishuu]-Ippan-012; H19-Junkankitou [Seishuu]-Ippan-012; H20-Junkankitou [Seishuu]-Ippan-013; H23-Junkankitou [Seishuu]-Ippan-005; H26-Junkankitou [Seisaku]-Ippan-001; H29-Junkankitou-Ippan-003; 20FA1002); National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (27-A-4, 30-A-15, 2021-A-16) and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP16H06277 and JP25330039.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, upon justified requests to the steering committee of the JACC study.
ETHICS STATEMENT
This study was approved by the Ethical Board of Nagoya University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan, and Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209‐249.
Henley SJ, Ward EM, Scott S, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part I: national cancer statistics. Cancer. 2020;126:2225‐2249.
Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017;66:683‐691.
Hong S, Won YJ, Lee JJ, et al. Community of population‐based regional cancer registries. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2018. Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53:301‐315.
Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research. 2021. Cancer statistics in Japan 2021. Available at: https://ganjoho.jp/data/reg_stat/statistics/brochure/2021/cancer_statistics_2021.pdf (Accessed: January 20, 2022).
Katanoda K, Hori M, Saito E, et al. Updated trends in cancer in Japan: incidence in 1985–2015 and mortality in 1958–2018 – a sign of decrease in cancer incidence. J Epidemiol. 2021;31:426‐450.
World Cancer Research Fund. International/American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Colorectal Cancer 2017; 8–10. Available at: https://www.wcrf.org/wp‐content/uploads/2021/02/Colorectal‐cancer‐report.pdf (Accessed: January 20, 2022).
Sasazuki S, Inoue M, Shimazu T, et al. Development and evaluation of cancer prevention strategies in Japan. Evidence‐based cancer prevention recommendations for Japanese. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018;48:576‐586.
Calder PC. Very long‐chain n‐3 fatty acids and human health: fact, fiction and the future. Proc Nutr Soc. 2018;77:52‐72.
Cockbain AJ, Toogood GJ, Hull MA. Omega‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids for the treatment and prevention of colorectal cancer. Gut. 2012;61:135‐149.
Aglago EK, Huybrechts I, Murphy N, et al. Consumption of fish and long‐chain n‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids is associated with reduced risk of colorectal cancer in a large European cohort. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18:654‐666.e6.
Kim Y, Kim J. Intake or blood levels of n‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020;29:288‐299.
Sasazuki S, Inoue M, Iwasaki M, et al. Japan public health center‐based prospective study group. Intake of n‐3 and n‐6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and development of colorectal cancer by subsite: Japan public health center‐based prospective study. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:1718‐1729.
Song M, Chan AT, Fuchs CS, et al. Dietary intake of fish, ω‐3 and ω‐6 fatty acids and risk of colorectal cancer: a prospective study in U.S. men and women. Int J Cancer. 2014;135:2413‐2423.
Iacopetta B. Are there two sides to colorectal cancer? Int J Cancer. 2002;101:403‐408.
Tamakoshi A, Ozasa K, Fujino Y, et al. Cohort profile of the Japan collaborative cohort study at final follow‐up. J Epidemiol. 2013;23:227‐232.
The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2002): Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiologic Research. 2002. Available at: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/general/seido/kousei/i‐kenkyu/ekigaku/0504sisin.html (Accessed: May 2, 2022) (in Japanese).
Working Group on Development of Ethics Guidelines for Informed Consent in Epidemiologic Research. Ethical guidelines on informed consent in epidemiologic research Version1.0. April 10, 2000. Available at: http://www.pubpoli‐imsut.jp/files/files/4/0000004.pdf?179c8ba678768d52d1114ef926754f27 (Accessed: May 2, 2022) (in Japanese).
Date C, Fukui M, Yamamoto A, et al. JACC study group. Reproducibility and validity of a self‐administered food frequency questionnaire used in the JACC study. J Epidemiol. 2005;15:S9‐S23.
Willett WC, Howe GR, Kushi LH. Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:1220S‐1228S. discussion 9S‐31S.
Williams CM, Burdge G. Long‐chain n‐3 PUFA: plant v. marine sources. Proc Nutr Soc. 2006;65:42‐50.
Barceló‐Coblijn G, Murphy EJ. Alpha‐linolenic acid and its conversion to longer chain n‐3 fatty acids: benefits for human health and a role in maintaining tissue n‐3 fatty acid levels. Prog Lipid Res. 2009;48:355‐374.
Serraino M, Thompson LU. Flaxseed supplementation and early markers of colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett. 1992;63:159‐165.
Jenab M, Thompson LU. The influence of flaxseed and lignans on colon carcinogenesis and beta‐glucuronidase activity. Carcinogenesis. 1996;17:1343‐1348.
Williams D, Verghese M, Walker LT, Boateng J, Shackelford L, Chawan CB. Flax seed oil and flax seed meal reduce the formation of aberrant crypt foci (ACF) in azoxymethane‐induced colon cancer in fisher 344 male rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007;45:153‐159.
Nagel JM, Brinkoetter M, Magkos F, et al. Dietary walnuts inhibit colorectal cancer growth in mice by suppressing angiogenesis. Nutrition. 2012;28:67‐75.
González‐Fernández MJ, Ortea I, Guil‐Guerrero JL. α‐Linolenic and γ‐linolenic acids exercise differential antitumor effects on HT‐29 human colorectal cancer cells. Toxicol Res (Camb). 2020;9:474‐483.
Chamberland JP, Moon HS. Down‐regulation of malignant potential by alpha linolenic acid in human and mouse colon cancer cells. Fam Cancer. 2015;14:25‐30.
Sasaki A, Nagatake T, Egami R, et al. Obesity suppresses cell‐competition‐mediated apical elimination of RasV12‐transformed cells from epithelial tissues. Cell Rep. 2018;23:974‐982.
Kraja B, Muka T, Ruiter R, et al. Dietary fiber intake modifies the positive association between n‐3 PUFA intake and colorectal cancer risk in a Caucasian population. J Nutr. 2015;145:1709‐1716.
Daniel CR, McCullough ML, Patel RC, et al. Dietary intake of omega‐6 and omega‐3 fatty acids and risk of colorectal cancer in a prospective cohort of U.S. men and women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:516‐525.
Shin A, Cho S, Sandin S, Lof M, Oh MY, Weiderpass E. Omega‐3 and ‐6 fatty acid intake and colorectal cancer risk in Swedish women's lifestyle and health cohort. Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52:848‐854.
Nguyen S, Li H, Yu D, et al. Dietary fatty acids and colorectal cancer risk in men: a report from the Shanghai Men's health study and a meta‐analysis. Int J Cancer. 2021;148:77‐89.
Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Jacobs EJ, et al. The American Cancer Society cancer prevention study II nutrition cohort: rationale, study design, and baseline characteristics. Cancer. 2002;94:2490‐2501.
Muka T, Kiefte‐de Jong JC, Hofman A, Dehghan A, Rivadeneira F, Franco OH. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and serum C‐reactive protein: the Rotterdam study. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181:846‐856.
Nagata C, Mizoue T, Tanaka K, et al. Soy intake and breast cancer risk: an evaluation based on a systematic review of epidemiologic evidence among the Japanese population. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44:282‐295.
Song M, Nishihara R, Cao Y, et al. Marine ω‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake and risk of colorectal cancer characterized by tumor‐infiltrating T cells. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:1197‐1206.
Rothwell PM, Wilson M, Elwin CE, et al. Long‐term effect of aspirin on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 20‐year follow‐up of five randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376:1741‐1750.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background
Epidemiological studies of the dietary intake of specific n‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and anatomical subsite‐specific colorectal cancer (CRC) are limited. We examined the prospective associations of total n‐3 PUFA, marine‐derived n‐3 PUFA [combined eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosapentaenoic acid (DPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)], and alpha‐linolenic acid (ALA) as plant‐derived n‐3 PUFA with the risk of CRC by subsite in the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study.
Methods
The participants completed a self‐administered food frequency questionnaire and had no prior history of CRC. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the associations between n‐3 PUFAs intake and CRC risk overall and by anatomical subsite.
Results
During the median 13.8‐year follow‐up period, 699 of the 42,536 participants aged 40–79 years developed incident CRC. An inverse association was found between dietary ALA intake and the risk of distal colon cancer; the multivariable hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the highest quartiles (Q4) were 0.41 (0.21–0.81;
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that higher ALA intake may be beneficial for lowering the risk of distal colon cancer.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
2 Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt
3 Department of Public Health, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan