It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTO) in coronary bifurcation lesions
(CBL) is undergoing substantial technical progress and standardization, paralleling the evolution
of dedicated devices, tools, and techniques. A standard consensus to classify CTO-CBL might be instrumental
to homogenize data collection and description of procedures for scientific and educational purposes.
The Medina-CTO classification replicates the classical three digits in Medina classification for bifurcations,
representing the proximal main vessel, distal main vessel, and side branch, respectively. Each digit
can take a value of 1 if it concerns atherosclerosis and is anatomically stenosed, or 0 if it is not. In addition,
the occluded segment(s) of the bifurcation are noted by a subscript, which describes key interventional
features of the cap: t (tapered), b (blunt), or a (ambiguous). This approach results in 56 basic categories
that can be grouped by means of different elements, depending on the specific needs of each study.
Medina-CTO classification, consisting of adding a subscript describing the basic cap characteristics
to the totally occluded segment(s) of the standard Medina triplet, might be a useful methodological tool
to standardize percutaneous intervention of bifurcational CTO lesions, with interesting scientific and
educational applications.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details











1 Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus, Koblenz, Germany. [email protected]
2 Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
3 Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
4 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
5 Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Germany
6 Jilin Heart Hospital, Changchun, China
7 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Hungary
8 University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
9 Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom
10 Division of Cardiology and Angiology II, University Heart Center Freiburg – Bad Krozingen, Germany