It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Lag-1 sparing is a common exception to the attentional blink, where a target presented directly after T1 can be identified and reported accurately. Prior work has proposed potential mechanisms for lag 1 sparing, including the boost and bounce model and the attentional gating model. Here, we apply a rapid serial visual presentation task to investigate the temporal limitations of lag 1 sparing by testing three distinct hypotheses. We found that endogenous engagement of attention to T2 requires between 50 and 100 ms. Critically, faster presentation rates yielded lower T2 performance, whereas decreased image duration did not impair T2 detection and report. These observations were reinforced by subsequent experiments controlling for short-term learning and capacity-dependent visual processing effects. Thus, lag-1 sparing was limited by the intrinsic dynamics of attentional boost engagement rather than by earlier perceptual bottlenecks such as insufficient exposure to images in the stimulus stream or visual processing capacity limitations. Taken together, these findings support the boost and bounce theory over earlier models that focus only on attentional gating or visual short-term memory storage, informing our understanding of how the human visual system deploys attention under challenging temporal constraints.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Brown University, Department of Neuroscience, The Carney Institute, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.40263.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9094); The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.40263.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9094); Brown University Alpert Medical School and Rhode Island Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.240588.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 0557 9478)
2 The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.40263.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9094); Brown University Alpert Medical School and Rhode Island Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.240588.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 0557 9478)
3 Brown University, Department of Neuroscience, The Carney Institute, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.40263.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9094); Brown University, Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.40263.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9094)
4 Brown University, Department of Neuroscience, The Carney Institute, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.40263.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9094); The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.40263.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9094); Brown University Alpert Medical School and Rhode Island Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.240588.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 0557 9478); Rhode Island Hospital, Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.240588.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 0557 9478)