It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Machine learning interatomic force fields are promising for combining high computational efficiency and accuracy in modeling quantum interactions and simulating atomistic dynamics. Active learning methods have been recently developed to train force fields efficiently and automatically. Among them, Bayesian active learning utilizes principled uncertainty quantification to make data acquisition decisions. In this work, we present a general Bayesian active learning workflow, where the force field is constructed from a sparse Gaussian process regression model based on atomic cluster expansion descriptors. To circumvent the high computational cost of the sparse Gaussian process uncertainty calculation, we formulate a high-performance approximate mapping of the uncertainty and demonstrate a speedup of several orders of magnitude. We demonstrate the autonomous active learning workflow by training a Bayesian force field model for silicon carbide (SiC) polymorphs in only a few days of computer time and show that pressure-induced phase transformations are accurately captured. The resulting model exhibits close agreement with both ab initio calculations and experimental measurements, and outperforms existing empirical models on vibrational and thermal properties. The active learning workflow readily generalizes to a wide range of material systems and accelerates their computational understanding.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Harvard University, John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X)
2 Harvard University, John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X); Harvard University, Department of Physics, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X)
3 Corporate Sector Research and Advance Engineering, Robert Bosch GmbH, Renningen, USA (GRID:grid.420831.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0529 6285); Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Materials Simulation, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.5570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0490 981X)
4 Harvard University, John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:000000041936754X); Robert Bosch LLC, Research and Technology Center, Watertown, USA (GRID:grid.420831.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0529 6285)