Introduction
Over the past century, kidney stones have become increasingly prevalent, particularly in more developed countries. The incidence of urolithiasis in a given population is dependent on the geographic area, racial distribution, socio-economic status, and dietary habits.1 In general, patients with a history of gout are at greater risk of forming uric acid stones, as are patients with obesity, diabetes, or complete metabolic syndrome.2 Moreover, elevated serum urate levels are known to lead to gouty arthritis, tophi formation, and uric acid kidney stones.3The incidence of uric acid stones varies between countries and accounts for 5% to 40% of all urinary calculi.4 Certain risk factors may be involved in the pathogenesis of uric acid nephrolithiasis, including low urinary volume and persistently low urinary pH.5
Calcium oxalate stones may form in some patients with gouty diathesis due to increased urinary excretion of calcium and reduced excretion of citrate. In addition, relative hypercalciuria in gouty diathesis with calcium oxalate stones may be due to intestinal hyperabsorption of calcium.6 Most urinary uric acid calculi are not pure in composition and complex urates, sodium, potassium, and calcium have been found together in various proportions.7 An analysis of stones in gout patients in Japan showed that the incidence of common calcium salt stones was over 60%, while that of uric acid stones was only 30%.8 This implies that the disruption of uric acid metabolism promotes not only uric acid stones, but also calcium salt stones. Therefore, a high serum urate level might be associated with nephrolithiasis and this provided the rationale for this study.
Methods
Overall, 120 male gouty arthritis patients with newly diagnosed gout and serum urate concentration of [greater than]7 mg/dL, and without previous kidney stone disease were allocated to one of the two groups according to their serum uric acid level: [lesser than]10 mg/dL (group 1, n=80) and [greater than or equal to]10 mg/dL (group 2, n=40). Patients were recruited from the rheumatology clinic of Taipei City Hospital (Renai and Zhongxing branches), a tertiary community hospital in Taiwan, from March 2015 to February 2016. They had been newly diagnosed with gout but had no clinical suggestions of renal stone disease. The exclusion criteria included previously treated gouty arthritis and current prescription of urate reabsorption inhibitors. The patient's age, duration of gout arthritis, presence of tophi, body mass index (BMI), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, urinary pH, and kidney ultrasonography were all measured and analysed. This study has been approved by the hospital's Institutional Review Board with informed consent waived.
Results for continuous variables were given as means ± standard deviations. Student's t test was used to compare the physical characteristics that were continuous in nature among the different subject groups and the Chi squared test was used to compare the difference in the stone detection rate between the two groups. A P value of [lesser than]0.05 was regarded as statistically significant for two-sided tests. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Windows version 12.0; SPSS Inc, Chicago [IL], US) was used for all statistical analyses.
Results
The mean age of the two study groups was similar (40 years). Family history of gout was present in 67.5% and 90% of groups 1 and 2, respectively. The time elapsed since onset of gout was less than 4 years in both groups. Tophaceous gout was found in 8.8% in group 1 and 10.0% in group 2. The prevalence of patients with a BMI of [greater than or equal to]30 kg/m2 was not statistically significant between the two groups. Only 6% of group 2 patients with kidney stones had a BMI of [greater than]95th percentile. In most cases, urinary pH was less than 5.5 in both groups and there were no abnormal changes to BUN or creatinine levels. Interestingly, the prevalence of kidney stones detected by ultrasonography was 6.3% in group 1 and 82.5% in group 2 (P[lesser than]0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of high serum urate level ([greater than]10 mg/dL) in predicting kidney stones was 87% and 91%, respectively (Table).
Discussion
Gout is a common metabolic disorder characterised by chronic hyperuricaemia, and serum urate level of [greater than]6.8 mg/dL that exceeds the physiological threshold of saturation. Urolithiasis is one of the well-known complications of gout. We hypothesise that serum urate level can be used as a predictive marker for urolithiasis. Uric acid, a weak organic acid, has very low pH-dependent solubility in aqueous solution. Approximately 70% of urate elimination occurs in urine, and the kidney plays a dominant role in determining plasma level.9 A serum urate level of [greater than]7 mg/dL is recognised as leading to gouty arthritis and uric acid stone formation. Moreover, recent epidemiological studies have identified serum urate elevation as an independent risk factor for chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension.3 Impaired renal uric acid excretion is the major mechanism of hyperuricaemia in patients with primary gout.10 The molecular mechanisms of renal urate transport are still incompletely understood. Urate transporter 1 is an organic anion transporter with highly specific urate transport activity, exchanging this anion with others including most of the endogenous organic anions and drug anions that are known to affect renal uric acid transport.10 11
Uric acid stones account for 10% of all kidney stones and are the second most common cause of urinary stones after calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate. The most important risk factor for uric acid crystallisation and stone formation is a low urine pH ([lesser than]5.5) rather than an increased urinary uric acid excretion.12 The proportion of uric acid stones varies between countries and accounts for 5% to 40% of all urinary calculi.4 Uric acid homeostasis is determined by the balance between its production, intestinal secretion, and renal excretion. The kidney is an important regulator of circulating uric acid levels by reabsorbing about 90% of filtered urate and being responsible for 60% to 70% of total body uric acid factor underpinning hyperuricaemia and gout.13 Pure uric acid stones are radiolucent but well visualised on renal ultrasound or non-contrast helical computed tomographic scanning; the latter is especially good for detection of stones which are [lesser than]5 mm in size.14Nonetheless the reason why most patients with gout present with acidic urine, even though only 20% have uric acid stones, remains unclear. In a US study, the prevalence of kidney stone disease was almost two-fold higher in men with a history of gout than in those without (15% vs 8%).15 Higher adiposity and weight gain are strong risk factors for gout in men, while weight loss is protective.15 An analysis by Shimizu8 of stones in gout patients revealed that the proportion of common calcium salt stones was over 60%, while that of uric acid stones was only about 30%. Overweight/obesity and older age associated with low urine pH were the principal characteristics of ‘pure' uric acid stone formers. Impaired urate excretion associated with increased serum uric acid is also another characteristic of uric acid stone formers and resembles patients with primary gout. Patients with pure calcium oxalate stones were younger; they had a low proportion of obese subjects and higher urinary calcium.16
Conventionally, BMI was stratified as normal ([lesser than]25 kg/m2), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2), or obese ([greater than or equal to]30 kg/m2). In males, the proportion of uric acid stones gradually increased with BMI, from 7.1% in normal BMI to 28.7% in obese subjects.17 The same was true in females, with the proportion of uric acid stones rising from 6.1% in normal BMI to 17.1% in obese subjects.17 Studies found that BMI is associated with an increased risk of kidney stone disease, but with a BMI of [greater than]30 kg/m2, further increases do not appear to significantly increase the risk of stone disease.17 18 An independent association between kidney stone disease and gout strongly suggests that they share common underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.19
Three major conditions control the potential for uric acid stone formation: the quantity of uric acid, the volume of urine as it affects the urinary concentration of uric acid, and the urinary pH.20 Two major abnormalities have been suggested to explain overly acidic urine: increased net acid excretion and impaired buffering caused by defective urinary ammonium excretion, with the combination resulting in abnormally acidic urine.21 Urinary alkalisation, which involves maintaining a continuously high urinary pH (pH 6-6.5), is considered by some or many to be the treatment of choice for uric acid stone dissolution and prevention.20 In general, gout is caused by the deposition of monosodium urate crystals in tissue that provokes a local inflammatory reaction. The formation of monosodium urate crystals is facilitated by hyperuricaemia. In a study by Sakhaee and Maalouf,21 being overweight and of older age were associated with low urine pH and one of the principal characteristics of pure uric acid stone formation. Impaired urate excretion associated with increased serum uric acid was another characteristic of uric acid stone formation that resembles patients with primary gout.
The limitations of this current study included the lack of measurement of uric acid concentration of urine in the participants, no further computed tomographic scanning for kidney stones, no analysis of stone composition, and limited representativeness of the study subjects. For example, there were only 10 obese patients (BMI [greater than or equal to]30 kg/m2) in the analysis. In this study, hyperuricaemia was a risk factor for kidney stone formation. Patients with serum urate level of [greater than]10 mg/dL should undergo ultrasound examination to look for any nephrolithiasis.
Declaration
All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
1. López M, Hoppe B. History, epidemiology and regional diversities of urolithiasis. Pediatr Nephrol 2010;25:49-59.
2. Liebman SE, Taylor JG, Bushinsky DA. Uric acid nephrolithiasis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2007;9:251-7.
3. Edwards NL. The role of hyperuricemia and gout in kidney and cardiovascular disease. Cleve Clin J Med 2008;75 Suppl 5:S13-6.
4. Shekarriz B, Stoller ML. Uric acid nephrolithiasis: current concepts and controversies. J Urol 2002;168:1307-14.
5. Ngo TC, Assimos DG. Uric acid nephrolithiasis: recent progress and future directions. Rev Urol 2007;9:17-27.
6. Pak CY, Moe OW, Sakhaee K, Peterson RD, Poindexter JR. Physicochemical metabolic characteristics for calcium oxalate stone formation in patients with gouty diathesis. J Urol 2005;173:1606-9.
7. Bellanato J, Cifuentes JL, Salvador E, Medina JA. Urates in uric acid renal calculi. Int J Urol 2009;16:318-21; discussion 322.
8. Shimizu T. Urolithiasis and nephropathy complicated with gout [in Japanese]. Nihon Rinsho 2008;66:717-22.
9. Marangella M. Uric acid elimination in the urine. Pathophysiological implications. Contrib Nephrol 2005;147:132-48.
10. Taniquchi A, Kamatani N. Control of renal uric acid excretion and gout. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2008;20:192-7.
11. Yamauchi T, Ueda T. Primary hyperuricemia due to decreased renal uric acid excretion [in Japanese]. Nihon Rinsho 2008;66:679-81.
12. Ferrari P, Bonny O. Diagnosis and prevention of uric acid stones [in German]. Ther Umsch 2004;61:571-4.
13. Bobulescu IA, Moe OW. Renal transport of uric acid: evolving concepts and uncertainties. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2012;19:358-71.
14. Wiederkehr MR, Moe OW. Uric acid nephrolithiasis: a systemic metabolic disorder. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab 2011;9:207-17.
15. Choi HK. Atkinson K, Karison EW, Curhan G. Obesity, weight change, hypertension, diuretic use, and risk of gout in men: the health professionals follow-up study. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:742-8.
16. Negri AL, Spivacow R, Del Valle E, et al. Clinical and biochemical profile of patients with “pure” uric acid nephrolithiasis compared with “pure” calcium oxalate stone formers. Urol Res 2007;35:247-51.
17. Daudon M, Lacour B, Jungers P. Influence of body size on urinary stone composition in men and women. Urol Res 2006;34:193-9.
18. Semins MJ, Shore AD, Makary MA, Magnuson T, Johns R, Matlaga BR. The association of increasing body mass index and kidney stone disease. J Urol 2010;183:571-5.
19. Kramer HM, Curhan G. The association between gout and nephrolithiasis: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, 1988-1994. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;40:37-42.
20. Cicerello E, Merlo F, Maccatrozzo L. Urinary alkalization for the treatment of uric acid nephrolithiasis. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2010;82:145-8.
21. Sakhaee K, Maalouf NM. Metabolic syndrome and uric acid nephrolithiasis. Semin Nephrol 2008;28:174-80.
KS Wan 1,2; CK Liu 3,4; MC Ko 3; WK Lee 3; CS Huang 2
1 Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Taipei City Hospital-Zhongxing Branch, Taiwan
2 Department of Pediatrics, Taipei City Hospital-Renai Branch, Taiwan
3 Department of Urology, Taipei City Hospital-Zhongxing Branch, Taiwan
4 Fu Jen Catholic University School of Medicine, Taiwan
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2016. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Introduction: An elevated serum urate level is recognised as a cause of gouty arthritis and uric acid stone. The level of serum uric acid that accelerates kidney stone formation, however, has not yet been clarified. This study aimed to find out if a high serum urate level is associated with nephrolithiasis.
Methods: Patients were recruited from the rheumatology clinic of Taipei City Hospital (Renai and Zhongxing branches) in Taiwan from March 2015 to February 2016. A total of 120 Chinese male patients with newly diagnosed gout and serum urate concentration of >7 mg/dL and no history of kidney stones were divided into two groups according to their serum urate level: <10 mg/dL (group 1, n=80) and ≥10 mg/dL (group 2, n=40). The mean body mass index, blood urea nitrogen level, creatinine level, urinary pH, and kidney ultrasonography were compared between the two groups.
Results: There were no significant differences in blood urea nitrogen or creatinine level between the two groups. The urine pH in both groups was similar and not statistically significant. Kidney stone formation was detected via ultrasonography in 6.3% (5/80) and 82.5% (33/40) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P<0.05).
Conclusion: A serum urate level of ≥10 mg/dL may precipitate nephrolithiasis. Further studies are warranted to substantiate the relationship between serum urate level and kidney stone formation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer