Abstract
Background
The long-term treatment trends of splenic injuries can provide guidance when treating trauma patients. The nonoperative management (NOM) of splenic injuries was introduced in early 1989. After decades of development, it has proven to be safe and is now the primary treatment choice worldwide. However, there remains a lack of nationwide registry data to support the feasibility and efficiency of NOM.
Methods
We used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to conduct a whole population-based cohort study. Patients admitted with blunt splenic injuries from 2002 to 2013 were identified. Demographic data, management methods, associated injuries, comorbidities and outcome parameters were collected. Patients were divided into 2 groups by the type of admitting institution: a tertiary center or a non-center hospital. We also used 4 years as an interval to analyze the changes in epidemiological data and treatment trends. Comparisons of the results of NOM and surgical management were also performed.
Results
A total of 12,455 patients were admitted with blunt splenic injuries between 2002 and 2013. Among the 11,551 patients treated in a single hospital after admission, patients underwent NOM more frequently at tertiary centers than at non-center hospitals (64.6% vs 50.3%). During the 12-year study period, the NOM rate increased from 56 to 73% in tertiary centers, while in noncenter hospitals, the rate only increased from 43 to 58%. The mortality rate decreased in tertiary centers from 8.9 to 7.2%, with no apparent change in noncenter hospitals. Complications occurred more frequently in the surgical management group.
Conclusion
There is a trend toward the use of NOM for blunt splenic injury treatments, and the outcomes from the NOM groups were not inferior to those of the operation group. In addition, tertiary centers performed more NOM than did non-center hospitals and better met the international consensus.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taoyuan City, Taiwan (GRID:grid.454211.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1756 999X)
2 Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taoyuan City, Taiwan (GRID:grid.454210.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1756 1461)
3 Chang Gung University, Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan City, Taiwan (GRID:grid.145695.a)
4 Chang Gung University, Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan (GRID:grid.145695.a)
5 Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taoyuan City, Taiwan (GRID:grid.454211.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1756 999X); Chang Gung University, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan (GRID:grid.145695.a); National Yang-Ming University, Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.260770.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0425 5914)





