Abstract
Background
Previous studies suggest that physical exercise could slow dementia progression. However, evidence for the cost effectiveness of structured exercise is conflicting and based on small trials.
Objectives
The objective of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of a tailored, structured, moderate- to high-intensity exercise programme versus usual care in people with mild to moderate dementia.
Methods
An economic evaluation was conducted from the UK National Health Service and personal social services perspective, based on data from a large randomised controlled trial. The primary clinical outcome was the participant reported ADAS-Cog (Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale) at 12 months. Costs (£; 2014–2015 prices) were collected prospectively over a 12-month follow-up period. A bivariate regression of costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), with multiple imputation of missing data, was conducted with the view to estimating the incremental cost per QALY gained and the incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) associated with the exercise programme plus usual care versus usual care. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to assess the impact of uncertainty surrounding aspects of the economic evaluation, and pre-specified subgroup analyses explored heterogeneity in the cost-effectiveness results.
Results
Participants (n = 494) were randomised to exercise plus usual care or usual care only. By 12 months the mean ADAS-Cog score had worsened slightly to 25.2 (standard deviation [SD] 12.3) in the exercise arm and 23.8 (SD 10.4) in the usual care: difference − 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) − 2.6 to − 0.2 (p = 0.03). The mean (standard error [SE]) costs over 12 months for experimental versus control was £5945 (US$7856) versus £4597 (US$6574), respectively; (difference: £1347 [$1926]; p = 0.0426). Mean (SE) QALY estimates were 0.787 (0.012) versus 0.826 (0.019), respectively (p = 0.090). The probability that the exercise programme is cost effective was < 1% across cost-effectiveness thresholds. INMBs ranged between –£2601 (US$3719) and £2158 (US$3086) at cost-effectiveness thresholds between £15,000 (US$21,450) and £30,000 (US$42,900) per QALY. The cost-effectiveness results remained robust to several sensitivity and subgroup analyses.
Conclusions
Building on the clinical results of the trial, which showed that the structured exercise programme evaluated does not slow cognitive impairment in people with mild to moderate dementia, this economic evaluation shows that the programme is not cost effective.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Petrou, Stavros 2 ; Khan, Kamran 2 ; Mistry, Dipesh 2 ; Lall, Ranjit 2 ; Sheehan, Bart 3 ; Lamb, Sarah 4 ; Dosanjh, Sukhdeep; Alleyne, Sharisse; Hennings, Susie; Nichols, Vivien; Finnegan, S.; Atherton, Nicky; Brown, Debbie; Collins, Helen; Lawlor, Brian; Turner, Angela Clayton; Freeman, Jenny; McCrone, Paul; Jones, Roy; Hughes, Julian; Phillips, Patrick; Atherton, N.; Bridgewater, S.; Eyre, E.; Hall, L.; Hill, L.; Hall, P.; Johnson, H.; Kaur, G.; Langdon, L.; Lowe, J.; Mathews, S.; Millichap, J.; Nussbaum, J.; On-kar, I.; Ritchie, C.; Russell, V.; Scott, G.; Shore, S.; Slowther, A.; Spanjers, K.; Stonehewer, L.; Thorogood, M.; Todd, J.; Ullah, A.; Waters, H.; Woods, L.; Withers, E.; Zeh, P.; Bond, A.; Brown, D.; Byrne, C.; McShane, R.; Richmond, H.; Thomas, N.; Thompson, J.; Dransfield, C.; Le Frenais, F.; Hall, C.; Rye, O.; Carson, R.; Clarke, M.; Eaton, H.; Ellis, H.; Farrand, A.; Gardner, S.; Harducas, C.; Rigby, L.; Wilson, J.; Johnson, L.; Lord, L.; Qassam, T.; Sadier, S.; Shipman, A.; South, L.; Statham, J.; Tomkins, J.; Weaver, D.; Coope, B.; Craddock, D.; Johal, A.; Lee, J.; Lindsay, J.; Tucker, J.; Vanderputt, R.; Cross, V.; Glithens-Mather, G.; Martin, L.; O’Reilly, C.; Rogers, E.; Sheridan, R.; Birtwell, K.; Brooke, J.; Davis, A.; Hinze, C.; Hussain, S.; Kennedy, A.; Mistry, H.; Noble, R.; Norton, R.; Oughton, E.; Sherwin, V.; Tinker, P.; Glancey, D.; Karrin, H.; Marudkar, M.; Borley, G.; Crisp, T.; Koranteng, P.; Lovesy, A.; Vogel, S.; Browne, B.; Colbourn, L.; Feast, A.; Hanratty, E.; Legerd, R.; Niland-Smith, R.; Sullivan, Theresa; Sullivan, Tony; Streater, A.; St Roas, H.; Anderton, M.; Blake, R.; Brown, K.; Marriott, S.; Simpson, S.; Thornhill, A.; Dawe, F.; Kuruvilla, T.; Moore, L.; Phillips, M.; Riley, G.; Uthup, A.1 University of Warwick, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK (GRID:grid.7372.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 8809 1613); University of London, King’s College London, London, UK (GRID:grid.4464.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2161 2573)
2 University of Warwick, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK (GRID:grid.7372.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 8809 1613)
3 Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.410556.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 0440 1440)
4 University of Warwick, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK (GRID:grid.7372.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 8809 1613); University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948); University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Centre for Rehabilitation Research In Oxford, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948)





