It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The transcription regulatory network inside a eukaryotic cell is defined by the combinatorial actions of transcription factors (TFs). However, TF binding studies in plants are too few in number to produce a general picture of this complex network. In this study, we use large-scale ChIP-seq to reconstruct it in the maize leaf, and train machine-learning models to predict TF binding and co-localization. The resulting network covers 77% of the expressed genes, and shows a scale-free topology and functional modularity like a real-world network. TF binding sequence preferences are conserved within family, while co-binding could be key for their binding specificity. Cross-species comparison shows that core network nodes at the top of the transmission of information being more conserved than those at the bottom. This study reveals the complex and redundant nature of the plant transcription regulatory network, and sheds light on its architecture, organizing principle and evolutionary trajectory.
Transcriptional factors (TFs) bind in a combinatorial fashion to specify the on-and-off states of genes in a complex and redundant regulatory network. Here, the authors construct the transcription regulatory network in maize leaf using 104 TFs ChIP-seq data and train machine learning models to predict TF binding and colocalization.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Shandong Agricultural University, The State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong, China (GRID:grid.440622.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9482 4676); State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (GRID:grid.10784.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0482)
2 Cornell University, Institute for Genomic Diversity, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X)
3 State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (GRID:grid.10784.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0482)
4 The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Department of Statistics, Hong Kong, China (GRID:grid.10784.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0482)
5 Shandong Agricultural University, The State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong, China (GRID:grid.440622.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 9482 4676)
6 Cornell University, Institute for Genomic Diversity, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X); Cornell University, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Section of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.5386.8) (ISNI:000000041936877X); Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Ithaca, USA (GRID:grid.463419.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0946 3608)