It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The accumulation and transmission of mechanical stresses in the cell cortex and membrane determines the mechanics of cell shape and coordinates essential physical behaviors, from cell polarization to cell migration. However, the extent that the membrane and cytoskeleton each contribute to the transmission of mechanical stresses to coordinate diverse behaviors is unclear. Here, we reconstitute a minimal model of the actomyosin cortex within liposomes that adheres, spreads and ultimately ruptures on a surface. During spreading, accumulated adhesion-induced (passive) stresses within the membrane drive changes in the spatial assembly of actin. By contrast, during rupture, accumulated myosin-induced (active) stresses within the cortex determine the rate of pore opening. Thus, in the same system, devoid of biochemical regulation, the membrane and cortex can each play a passive or active role in the generation and transmission of mechanical stress, and their relative roles drive diverse biomimetic physical behaviors.
Visualization of F-actin within liposomes during their adhesion, spreading and rupture reveals mechanical interactions of membrane and cytoskeleton can lead to complex cellular assembly in absence of biochemical regulation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Yale University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Haven, USA (GRID:grid.47100.32) (ISNI:0000000419368710); Systems Biology Institute, West Haven, USA (GRID:grid.47100.32)
2 Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Physics, Pittsburgh, USA (GRID:grid.147455.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 0344)
3 University of Chicago, Department of Physics, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.170205.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7822); James Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.170205.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7822); Institute for Biophysical Sciences and Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.170205.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7822)
4 Laboratoire de Physique, l’Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France (GRID:grid.5607.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2353 2622)
5 Yale University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Haven, USA (GRID:grid.47100.32) (ISNI:0000000419368710); Systems Biology Institute, West Haven, USA (GRID:grid.47100.32); Yale University, Department of Physics, New Haven, USA (GRID:grid.47100.32) (ISNI:0000000419368710)