1. Introduction
Blastocystis sp. is currently the most common intestinal protozoan identified in the human population worldwide [1,2,3,4] since its prevalence has often been reported to exceed 50% in developing countries from diverse geographical areas and, in particular, in the African continent [5,6,7]. This enteric microorganism has also been frequently detected in the gastrointestinal tract of a wide range of animals, including numerous groups of mammals, birds, fish, reptiles and insects [8,9,10,11]. Like other intestinal protozoa, the main mode of transmission of Blastocystis sp. is the indirect fecal–oral route through the consumption of water and eventually food contaminated by resistant cystic forms of the parasite excreted by various hosts [2,12,13,14]. Transmission can also occur through direct contact, either with infected humans or animals, due to the zoonotic potential of this microorganism [15]. Based on its observed frequency, an estimated 1 billion people could be infected with Blastocystis sp. across the world, with a large majority of them asymptomatic carriers [16]. In this respect, the presence of this parasite is generally associated with a healthy gut microbiota, according to repeated metagenomics surveys conducted in colonized humans [17,18,19,20]. However, under particular circumstances, a proportion of individuals vulnerable to this parasitic infection and its pathogenicity presents gastrointestinal symptoms, mainly diarrhea and abdominal pain, and even skin disorders, such as urticaria [12,21,22]. Moreover, several findings suggest that colorectal cancer may be related with elevated risk of Blastocystis sp. infection [23]. Recent in vitro studies, coupled with genomic data, resulted in the identification of different virulence factors involved in the pathophysiology of this parasite, which could be associated with the genetic diversity of Blastocystis sp. isolates [24,25].
It has been evidenced that the genus Blastocystis presents a wide genetic diversity, based on the comparison of the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene sequences. Accordingly, 38 genetic variants, called subtypes (STs), that may correspond to species have been proposed at this time (ST1 to ST38) [26,27]. Among these STs, 34 of them have been validated, while the remaining 4 STs (ST18-ST20 and ST22) could represent chimaeras arising during Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification [28]. Among all these STs, only 14 (ST1-ST10, ST12, ST14, ST16 and ST23) have been found in the human population, with extremely variable frequencies [7,29,30,31,32,33]. Indeed, by globally analyzing the epidemiological data available in numerous countries, ST1 to ST4 represent more than 90% of the subtyped human isolates [29]. Accordingly, and even if these four STs can be found in animal groups, ST1 to ST4 are, thus, essentially transmitted by the inter-human route. Conversely, other STs found less frequently or rarely in humans are considered to be of animal origin because of their predominance in particular groups of mammals or birds. For example, ST5 mainly occurs in pigs, ST6 and ST7 in poultry and ST10 and ST14 in livestock [8,9,10]. The presence of these STs in the human population can, therefore, be explained by zoonotic transmission, as evidenced in recent studies through the identification of isolates exhibiting the same SSU rRNA gene sequence in both individuals and in-contact animals [15,34,35].
Because of the potential impact of Blastocystis sp. on public health and the growing use of PCR-based approaches for its detection, a noticeable increasing interest for this enteric protozoan has been recorded over the last decade with the completion of a very large number of epidemiological studies worldwide. However, some geographical areas remain under-investigated, like that of Southeast Asia. Indeed, while numerous surveys have been performed in Thailand, and to a lesser extent in Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines, as recently reviewed [1,2], little or no epidemiological data are available for other southeast Asian countries, such as Vietnam. However, parts of this lower-middle-income country with a population of nearly 100 million people are at high risk of parasitic infections, mainly due to a lack of water sanitation. To date, only two studies concerning the frequency of intestinal parasites in Vietnamese individuals are found in the literature [36,37]. Nevertheless, both studies, conducted outside Vietnam, involved two cohorts of Vietnamese immigrants arriving in Taiwan. The prevalence of Blastocystis sp. observed in these two surveys was similar and around 20%. However, the real prevalence was probably underestimated, considering that the parasite was only identified by direct-light microscopy observation of fecal smears, a low-sensitivity diagnostic method for the detection of Blastocystis sp. compared to PCR assays [38,39].
Therefore, the first molecular epidemiological survey ever performed in Vietnam was conducted on a cohort of more than 300 patients followed at the Family Hospital of Da Nang. The aim of the present study was, thus, to determine the prevalence and ST distribution of Blastocystis sp. isolates identified in this Vietnamese cohort by real-time PCR (qPCR) and sequencing, then to identify potential modes of transmission of the parasite within this population according to subtyping data.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethics Approval and Questionnaire
The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Family Hospital of Da Nang, Vietnam (reference number 201120/QD-FAMILY; Date of approval: 20 November 2020). This survey was conducted in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki III) and with the International Ethical Guidelines for Biological Research Involving Human Subjects. The research objectives of the study were clearly explained to all the participants prior to enrollment, and written consent forms were obtained from each adult or from the parents of minors. Each research participant was provided with a carefully designed questionnaire to collect epidemiological information, including sex, age, place of residence, contact with animals, source of drinking water (well, tap or mineral water) and presence of gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting, abdominal bloating and constipation). If at least one of the 5 selected digestive disorders listed above was reported, the individual was considered symptomatic. The data obtained for each subject were fully anonymized through the encryption of the identity of individuals.
2.2. Sampling Site and Collection of Samples
Briefly, Vietnam, Southeast Asia, is a country divided into 58 provinces and 5 municipalities corresponding to the 5 most populated cities of the country. Da Nang (geographical coordinates: latitude 16°3′16″ N, longitude 108°12′8″ E), which is located in the Central Coast region of southern Vietnam, is the fourth largest city of the country, with an estimated population of around 1 million people (Figure 1). Da Nang borders the South China Sea and is located about 600 km from Hanoi, the capital, and Ho Chi Minh City. It is also one of the most important port cities in Vietnam. All the samples were collected between December 2020 and October 2021 in the Family Hospital located in the North of the Da Nang agglomeration.
A total of 310 patients, followed for different pathologies or routine examinations and presenting or not digestive disorders, were enrolled. These patients were originally from 10 provinces or municipalities in Vietnam, but the large majority of them lived in the Da Nang municipality (138/310, 44.5%) and the neighboring province of Quang Nam (150/310, 48.4%) (Figure 1).
Stool samples (1 sample per patient) were collected during routine clinical procedures. For each subject, approximately 2 g of fresh stool was added to 2 mL of 2.5% potassium dichromate (w/v in water) (Sigma Life Sciences, Saint Louis, MO, USA) in a sterile Falcon tube, then mixed vigorously for homogenization before storage at 4 °C. The samples were subsequently transferred to the Pasteur Institute of Lille (France) for further processing.
2.3. DNA Extraction, PCR Assays and Molecular Subtyping/Genotyping of Blastocystis sp. Isolates
Upon arrival in France, the fecal specimens were washed 3 times with distilled water by centrifugation at 3000 g for 10 min to remove any trace of potassium dichromate. The last supernatant was discarded, and the resulting ultimate pellet was diluted in 500 µL of sterile water. The total genomic DNA was extracted from the diluted pellet using the NucleoSpin 96 Soil kit or NucleoSpin Soil, Mini kit for DNA from Soil (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co KG, Düren, Germany), following the recommended procedures of the manufacturer. DNA was eluted in 100 μL of elution buffer provided in the kits and stored at −20 °C. The Blastocystis-specific primers BL18SPPF1 (5′-AGTAGTCATACGCTCGTCTCAAA-3′) and BL18SR2PP (5′-TCTTCGTTACCCGTTACTGC-3′) were used to amplify the SSU rRNA gene by qPCR from 2 μL of extracted DNA, as previously described [39]. The corresponding amplified gene domain of about 300 bp has been shown to contain sufficient sequence information for accurate subtyping of Blastocystis sp. isolates. PCR screening was conducted in duplicate for each sample, and positive (Blastocystis sp. ST8 DNA obtained from axenic culture) and negative (reagent-grade water) controls were included in the assays. The STs of Blastocystis sp.-positive specimens were identified by sequence analysis of the purified qPCR products (Genoscreen, Lille, France; SANGER technology platform, 3730XL DNA Analyzer). For a significant proportion of samples, a double trace was observed during the analysis of the sequence chromatogram, suggesting mixed infection by at least two different Blastocystis sp. STs. To provide insight into the distribution of STs in mixed infections, some specimens were selected based on the qPCR amplification intensity for reanalysis by end-point PCR, using the same primer pair as for qPCR, as previously detailed [40]. The PCR products obtained and visualized on agarose gel were purified using the NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up kit (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co KG), cloned in the T-vector TA pCR–TOPO 2.1 of the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol, then amplified in One Shot TOP10 Chemically Competent Escherichia coli (Invitrogen). Minipreparations of plasmids were performed using the NucleoSpin Plasmid kit (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co KG). For each specimen, five positive clones exhibiting an insert of the expected size were randomly selected and sequenced on both strands. The obtained sequences in this study have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers OP716077-OP716164. For subtyping of the isolates, the obtained SSU rRNA sequences were compared with all homologous sequences available for the known Blastocystis sp. STs at the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), using the nucleotide Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) program. The sequences of Blastocystis sp. isolates from the same ST were subsequently aligned against each other using the BioEdit v7.0.1 package (Date of release 10 June 2019;
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Fisher’s exact test was used to study the potential relationship between the various category variables. Blastocystis sp. colonization and STs were chosen as the main outcomes, and the multilevel logistic mixed regression models were created to generate odds ratios (ORs) and the 95% confidence interval (CI). The p-value of less than 0.05 was set as the limit for significance. All analyses were conducted using the package statistics and odds ratio 2.0.1 from the R statistical computing program (Version 4.1.1 Date of release 8 October 2021; R Development Core Team,
3. Results and Discussion
To our knowledge, this study is the first investigation of the molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis sp. ever conducted in the Vietnamese population. In this context, the stool samples of a cohort of 310 patients enrolled at the Family Hospital in Da Nang and aged 7 months to 89 years (mean age of 34 ± 12 years) were screened for the presence of this parasite by qPCR. Of the 310 specimens tested, 80 were positive, for an overall prevalence of 34.5% (Table 1).
This frequency was, thus, approximately doubled compared to that previously reported in Vietnamese immigrants in Taiwan using non-molecular methods [36,37]. On the other hand, and considering only investigations performed in southeast Asia using molecular detection assays, the prevalence in Vietnam was close to the average frequency reported from neighboring countries, such as Thailand (22.3%), Indonesia (31.8%) or Malaysia (24.7%), but significantly lower than those observed in the Philippines (49.1%) and Cambodia (55.2%), even if this frequency was based on a single epidemiological study for the latter country [1,2]. Moreover, in some of these countries, for which a relatively large number of surveys have been conducted, such as Thailand, the Philippines and Malaysia, the prevalence observed varies greatly depending on the geographical area or the cohort considered, ranging from 5.2 to 40.6%, 15.3 to 82.9% and 9.2 to 40.3%, respectively [1,23]. All these data clearly highlight the active circulation of Blastocystis sp. in Vietnam and more globally in the Southeast Asian population.
Statistical tests were performed, focusing on the cohort of patients from the Da Nang municipality (138 individuals) and Quang Nam province (150 subjects), which together accounted for around 93% (288/310) of the participants included in this study. Considering these 2 most frequent places of residence, no significant association between parasite infection and geographical area was found (35.5% of positive individuals in Da Nang versus 34.7% in Quang Nam; Fisher exact test, p = 0.902). Within this cohort of 288 subjects, neither gender (Fisher exact test, p = 0.137), age (Fisher exact test, p = 0.486) and contact with animals (Fisher exact test, p = 0.242) nor consumption of well water (Fisher exact test, p = 0.372) were significantly associated with the infection. The prevalence of Blastocystis sp. was also not significantly higher in patients considered symptomatic (15.8%) versus asymptomatic subjects (11.2%) (Fisher exact test, p = 0.273). Additionally, none of the digestive disorders considered in this survey was significantly more frequent in symptomatic patients, such as the case of diarrhea (Fisher exact test, p = 0.204), abdominal pain (Fisher exact test, p = 0.328), constipation (Fisher exact test, p = 0.389) or vomiting (Fisher exact test, p = 0.126). None of the subjects indicated suffering from abdominal bloating in the present study.
Direct sequencing of the 107 purified qPCR products from positive samples resulted in the identification of 55 single infections with a broad range of STs (Table 1). ST3 was the major reported ST (n = 23, 41.9%), followed by ST10 (n = 8, 14.6%), ST7 (n = 7, 12.7%), ST1 and ST14 (n = 6 each, 10.9%), ST4 and ST6 (n = 2 each, 3.6%) and ST8 (n = 1, 1.8%) (Table 1). The remaining positive samples (52/107, 48.6%) corresponded to mixed infections, according to the analysis of sequence chromatograms. Such a high rate of mixed infections in the Vietnamese cohort likely reflected numerous sources of Blastocystis sp. infection, whether human, animal or environmental. To clarify this issue, 13 samples selected from the 52 corresponding to mixed infections were re-analyzed by end-point PCR, before the cloning of PCR products and sequencing of corresponding clones. Six mixed infections by two STs (two samples with ST10/ST14 and one sample with ST1/ST7, ST3/ST10, ST3/ST14 or ST7/ST14) and seven mixed infections by three STs (five samples with ST3/ST10/ST14 and one sample with either ST3/ST7/ST14 or ST3/ST7/ST10) were recorded. Not surprisingly, these mixed infections corresponded to different mixtures of the four STs (ST3, ST7, ST10 and ST14) occurring with the highest frequencies in our cohort. With the addition of these new data, a total of 88 subtyped isolates were considered (Table 2).
Among them, ST3 remained largely predominant, representing 36.4% (n = 32) of the isolates, followed by ST10 (n = 17), ST14 (n = 16), ST7 (n = 11), ST1 (n = 7), ST4 and ST6 (n = 2 each) and ST8 (n = 1) (Table 2). Based on these epidemiological data, no significant difference in the ST distribution was revealed according to age, sex of the participants and contact with animals. Interestingly, this ST distribution varied widely between the Da Nang municipality and Quang Nam province. Indeed, a higher prevalence of ST1 infection was reported in Da Nang (p = 0.055), while some other STs were overrepresented in Quang Nam province, including ST7 (p = 0.320), ST10 (p = 0.056) and ST14 (p = 0.060), even if these associations were not significant. By grouping the bovine ST10 and ST14 isolates, persons living in the Quang Nam area had a 3.4 higher risk of infection by these isolates, compared to persons from Da Nang (OR: 3.400, CI: 1.302–10.583, p = 0.019). This difference in ST distribution could be explained by the rurality of the province of Quang Nam in comparison to the more urbanized Da Nang area and the increased presence in the vicinity of dwellings of poultry and livestock, which are known to be carriers of ST7 and ST10/ST14 [8,9,10], respectively, and thus potential reservoirs of parasite transmission to inhabitants. Moreover, individuals who drank well water (OR: 10.875, CI: 1.770–68.146, p = 0.008) or presented constipation (OR: 11.375, CI: 1.311–81.393, p = 0.016) were significantly predictive of the risk of ST1 infection.
By comparing this global ST distribution in Vietnam with those documented in other Southeast Asian countries [1,2], ST3 was also predominant in the Philippines, Malaysia and Cambodia, as described in a majority of countries worldwide, while in contrast, ST1 was most common in Thailand and Indonesia. Strikingly, the distribution of STs in Vietnam presented a major particularity, with a large proportion of isolates considered as zoonotic. Indeed, the avian ST6 and ST7, the ST8 known to colonize primates as other hosts, and the bovine-adapted ST10 and ST14 [2,8,9,10,35] accounted for more than 50% of the subtyped isolates, highlighting a wide zoonotic transmission of Blastocystis sp. in this Vietnamese cohort. Furthermore, while ST6, ST7 or both STs had already been recognized in communities from Thailand, the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia, the present study was the first to identify ST8, ST10 and ST14 in the Southeast Asian population investigated so far [1,2].
To expand our knowledge of the circulation of Blastocystis sp. in Vietnam, sequences of isolates belonging to the main STs were aligned with each other to evaluate intra-ST diversity and identify so-called genotypes (Figure 2).
Briefly, the analysis of the variable positions within the alignments of each ST resulted in the identification of 3 genotypes of ST1, for a total of 7 isolates and, thus, an average ratio of 2.3 isolates per genotype. The average ratios observed for the other STs were 3.6 for ST3 (32 isolates for 9 genotypes), 1 for ST7 (11 isolates for 11 genotypes), 1.3 for ST10 (17 isolates for 13 genotypes) and 1.8 for ST14 (16 isolates for 9 genotypes). Since this ratio is inversely proportional to intra-ST variability, ST3 exhibited the lowest intra-ST diversity, followed by ST1, ST14, ST10 and ST7. Using the same approach, the lowest sequence variability among ST3 isolates compared to ST1 was also described in surveys conducted in Guinea [7], Senegal [6] and Lebanon [41]. The low number of ST3 genotypes could be undoubtedly correlated to active human-to-human transmission within the Vietnamese population since this ST is not frequently reported in domestic or farm animals. Moreover, the circulation of the predominant ST3-1 genotype (72% of the ST3 isolates) in both the Da Nang and Quang Nam areas reinforced this statement. ST1 transmission could also be in large part anthroponotic regarding the low number of ST1 genotypes, even if this ST was identified in different animal groups and as the most widespread ST from various water sources in Asiatic countries [2]. Consequently, a wide transmission of certain ST1 genotypes to the population through the consumption of water contaminated by feces from various hosts could not be excluded. Interestingly, the impressive number of genotypes identified for ST7 was inconsistent with large-scale transmission from limited sources of contamination. Although the majority of participants colonized with ST7 did not report contact with animals, they were likely individually infected after contact with bird droppings in water or food, as, for instance, in vegetable gardens or markets. A similar hypothesis could be put forward to explain the huge number of bovine ST10 and ST14 genotypes found in the Vietnamese population. The large amount of free-range and farmed animals in rural Vietnam, coupled with poor water sanitation in some areas, could actively contribute to the spreading of Blastocystis sp. zoonotic STs. In this respect, ST10 was, for instance, identified in various water sources in a neighboring country, Malaysia [41].
Moving forward, a multi-center epidemiological study has to be performed in southern Vietnam, with the aim of confirming the active circulation of Blastocystis sp. in this country and its transmission patterns suggested from data collected in the Da Nang area. Additionally, and for a better understanding of parasite transmission dynamics, it remains crucial to explore Blastocystis sp. under the One Health perspective by screening human, animal and environmental samples collected within the same restricted Vietnamese geographical area, as it was recently conducted in a rural community in northern Thailand [33].
Conceptualization, L.D.N.N. and E.V.; Formal analysis, N.G., T.T.H., B.T.D. and J.D.; Funding acquisition, E.V.; Investigation, N.G., T.T.H., B.T.D., J.D., D.N., T.N.T., A.D.T., G.E., M.C., G.C. and E.V.; Project administration, L.D.N.N. and E.V.; Resources, G.C., M.C. and E.V.; Software, G.E. and E.V.; Supervision, L.D.N.N. and E.V.; Validation, L.D.N.N. and E.V.; Writing—original draft, E.V.; Writing—review & editing, L.D.N.N., G.E., G.C., M.C. and E.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
The authors are grateful to all those who participated in the study and especially Van Thi Nguyen and Tien Thi Cam Vo from the technical staff of the family Hospital of Da Nang for their help and support in obtaining and managing the samples.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Map of Vietnam showing the place of residence of the subjects enrolled in this survey. The number of participants living in each province or municipality is indicated between brackets.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Alignment of partial SSU rRNA gene sequences from Blastocystis sp. ST1 (A), ST3 (B), ST7 (C), ST10 (D) and ST14 (E) isolates. Only the variable positions are shown in these alignments. The positions of variable positions with respect to the reference sequences (genotypes ST1-1, ST3-1, ST7-1, ST10-1 and ST14-1) are indicated above the alignment (vertical numbering). Nucleotides identical to those of the reference sequences are represented by dashes, and gaps are represented by asterisks. All the genotypes identified for each ST are indicated on the left of the alignment, whereas the total number and percentage of isolates identified in our study for each genotype are reported on the right.
Prevalence and ST distribution of Blastocystis sp. in the 10 Vietnamese provinces and municipalities screened in the present study.
| Blastocystis sp. STs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provinces/ |
Samples (n) | Positive Samples (n) | Prevalence (%) | ST1 | ST3 | ST4 | ST6 | ST7 | ST8 | ST10 | ST14 | MI a |
| Da Nang | 138 | 49 | 35.5 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 24 |
| Quang Nam | 150 | 52 | 34.7 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 23 |
| Thua Thien Hué | 8 | 2 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Quang Tri | 4 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Quang Ngai | 3 | 1 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Quang Binh | 3 | 2 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dak Lak | 1 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Gia Lai | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Ha Nam | 1 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ha Noi | 1 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total | 310 | 107 | 34.5 | 6 | 23 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 52 |
a MI, Mixed infections.
Distribution of Blastocystis sp. STs in the Vietnamese cohort after considering subtyped isolates present in mixed infections.
| Blastocystis sp. STs | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provinces/ |
ST1 | ST3 | ST4 | ST6 | ST7 | ST8 | ST10 | ST14 | MI a |
| Da Nang | 6 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 19 |
| Quang Nam | 1 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 12 | 11 | 16 |
| Thua Thien Hué | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Quang Tri | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Quang Ngai | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Quang Binh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dak Lak | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Gia Lai | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Ha Nam | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ha Noi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Total | 7 | 32 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 17 | 16 | 39 |
a MI, Mixed infections.
References
1. Nemati, S.; Reza Zali, M.; Johnson, P.; Mirjalali, H.; Karanis, P. Molecular prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Asia and Australia. J. Water Health; 2021; 19, 687. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wh.2021.011]
2. Rauff-Adetotun, A.A.; Meor Termizi, F.H.; Shaari, N.; Lee, I.L. The coexistence of Blastocystis spp. in humans, animals and environmental sources from 2010–2021 in Asia. Biology; 2021; 10, 990. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology10100990]
3. Jimenez, P.; Munoz, M.; Ramirez, J.D. An update on the distribution of Blastocystis subtypes in the Americas. Helyon; 2023; 8, e12592. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12592] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36619449]
4. Ning, C.-Q.; Hu, Z.-H.; Chen, J.-H.; Tian, L.-G. Epidemiology of Blastocystis infection from 1990 to 2019 in China. Infect. Dis. Poverty; 2020; 9, 168. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-020-00779-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380335]
5. Lokmer, A.; Cian, A.; Froment, A.; Gantois, N.; Viscogliosi, E.; Chabé, M.; Ségurel, L. Use of shotgun metagenomics for the identification of protozoa in the gut microbiota of healthy individuals from worldwide populations with various industrialization levels. PLoS ONE; 2019; 14, e0211139. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211139]
6. Khaled, S.; Gantois, N.; Tidjani Ly, A.; Senghor, S.; Even, G.; Dautel, E.; Dejager, R.; Sawant, M.; Baydoun, M.; Benamrouz-Vanneste, S. et al. Prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Senegalese school children. Microorganisms; 2020; 8, 1408. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091408] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32932661]
7. Guilavogui, T.; Gantois, N.; Even, G.; Desramaut, J.; Dautel, E.; Denoyelle, C.; Cissé, F.I.; Touré, S.C.; Kourouma, B.L.; Sawant, M. et al. Detection, Molecular identification and transmission of the intestinal protozoa Blastocystis sp. in Guinea from a large-scale epidemiological study conducted in the Conakry area. Microorganisms; 2022; 10, 446. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020446]
8. Hublin, J.S.Y.; Maloney, J.G.; Santin, M. Blastocystis in domesticated and wild mammals and birds. Res. Vet. Sci.; 2021; 135, pp. 260-282. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.09.031] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33046256]
9. Rauff-Adedotun, A.A.; Mohd Zain, S.N.; Farah Haziqah, M.T. Current status of Blastocystis sp. in animals from Southeast Asia: A review. Parasitol. Res.; 2020; 119, pp. 3559-3570. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-020-06828-8]
10. Sanggari, A.; Komala, T.; Rauff-Adetotun, A.A.; Awosolu, O.B.; Attah, O.A.; Farah Haziqah, M.T. Blastocystis in captivated and free-ranging wild animals worldwide: A review. Trop. Biomed.; 2022; 39, pp. 338-372.
11. Gantois, N.; Lamot, A.; Seesao, Y.; Creusy, C.; Li, L.L.; Monchy, S.; Benamrouz-Vanneste, S.; Karpouzopoulos, J.; Bourgain, J.L.; Rault, C. et al. First report on the prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in edible marine fish and marine mammals: A large scale-study conducted in Atlantic Northeast and on the coasts of Northern France. Microorganisms; 2020; 8, 460. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8030460] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32213897]
12. Tan, K.S.W. New insights on classification, identification, and clinical relevance of Blastocystis spp. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.; 2008; 21, pp. 639-665. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00022-08]
13. Attah, A.O.; Sanggari, A.; Li, L.I.; Nik Him, N.A.I.I.; Ismail, A.H.; Meor Termizi, F.H. Blastocystis occurrence in water sources worldwide from 2005 to 2022: A review. Parasitol. Res.; 2023; 122, pp. 1-10. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07731-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36434314]
14. Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Karim, M.R.; Zhang, L. Detection of human intestinal protozoan parasites in vegetables and fruits: A review. Parasit. Vectors; 2020; 13, 380. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04255-3]
15. Stensvold, C.R.; Alfellani, M.A.; Norskov-Lauritsen, S.; Prip, K.; Victory, E.L.; Maddox, C.; Nielsen, H.V.; Clark, C.G. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis isolates from synanthropic and zoo animals and identification of a new subtype. Int. J. Parasitol.; 2009; 39, pp. 473-479. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.07.006] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18755193]
16. Andersen, L.O.; Stensvold, C.R. Blastocystis in health and disease: Are we moving from a clinical to a public health perspective?. J. Clin. Microbiol.; 2016; 54, pp. 524-528. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02520-15]
17. Audebert, C.; Even, G.; Cian, A. Blastocystis Investigation Group Loywick, A.; Merlin, S.; Viscogliosi, E.; Chabé, M. Colonization with the enteric protozoa Blastocystis is associated with increased diversity of human gut bacterial microbiota. Sci. Rep.; 2016; 6, 25255. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25255]
18. Tito, R.Y.; Chaffron, S.; Caenepeel, C.; Lima-Mendez, G.; Wang, J.; Vieira-Silva, S.; Falony, G.; Hildebrand, F.; Darzi, Y.; Rymenans, L. et al. Population-level analysis of Blastocystis subtype prevalence and variation in the human gut microbiota. Gut; 2019; 68, pp. 1180-1189. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316106]
19. Even, G.; Lokmer, A.; Rodrigues, J.; Audebert, C.; Viscogliosi, E.; Ségurel, L.; Chabé, M. Changes in the human gut microbiota associated with colonization by Blastocystis sp. and Entamoeba spp. in non-industrialized populations. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.; 2021; 11, 533528. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.533528]
20. Yason, J.A.; Liang, Y.R.; Png, C.W.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, K.S.W. Interactions between a pathogenic Blastocystis subtype and gut microbiota: In vitro and in vivo studies. Microbiome; 2019; 7, 30. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0644-3]
21. Fréalle, E.; El Safadi, D.; Cian, A.; Aubry, E.; Certad, G.; Osman, M.; Wacrenier, A.; Dutoit, E.; Creusy, C.; Dubos, F. et al. Acute Blastocystis-associated appendicular peritonitis in a child, Casablanca, Morocco. Emerg. Infect. Dis.; 2015; 21, pp. 91-94. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2101.140544] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25528951]
22. Aykur, M.; Camyar, A.; Türk, B.G.; Sin, A.Z.; Dagci, H. Evaluation of association with subtypes and alleles of Blastocystis with chronic spontaneous urticarial. Acta Trop.; 2022; 231, 106455. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106455]
23. Taghipour, A.; Rayatdoost, E.; Bairami, A.; Bahadory, S.; Abdoli, A. Are Blastocystis hominis and Cryptosporidium spp. playing a positive role in colorectal cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect. J. Agents Cancer; 2022; 17, 32. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13027-022-00447-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35715853]
24. Ajjampur, S.S.; Tan, K.S.W. Pathogenic mechanisms in Blastocystis spp.—Interpreting results from in vitro and in vivo studies. Parasitol. Int.; 2016; 65, pp. 772-779. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2016.05.007]
25. Deng, L.; Wojciech, L.; Gascoigne, N.R.J.; Peng, G.; Tan, K.S.W. New insights into the interactions between Blastocystis, the gut microbiota, and host immunity. PLoS Pathog.; 2021; 17, e1009253. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009253]
26. Baek, S.; Maloney, J.G.; Molokin, A.; George, N.S.; Vecino, J.A.C.; Santin, M. Diversity of Blastocystis subtypes in horses in Colombia and identification of two new subtypes. Microorganisms; 2022; 10, 1693. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091693]
27. Maloney, J.G.; Molokin, A.; Segui, R.; Maravilla, P.; Martinez-Hernandez, F.; Villalobos, G.; Tsaousis, A.D.; Gentekaki, E.; Munoz-Antoli, C.; Klisiowicz, D.R. et al. Identification and molecular characterization of four new Blastocystis subtypes designated ST35-ST38. Microorganisms; 2023; 11, 46. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010046]
28. Stensvold, C.R.; Clark, C.G. Pre-empting Pandora’s box: Blastocystis subtypes revisited. Trends Parasitol.; 2020; 36, pp. 229-232. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.009]
29. Alfellani, M.A.; Stensvold, C.R.; Vidal-Lapiedra, A.; Onuoha, E.S.; Fagbenro-Beyioku, A.F.; Clark, C.G. Variable geographic distribution of Blastocystis subtypes and its potential implications. Acta Trop.; 2013; 126, pp. 11-18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.12.011]
30. Ramírez, J.D.; Sánchez, A.; Hernández, C.; Florez, C.; Bernal, M.C.; Giraldo, J.C.; Reyes, P.; Lopez, M.C.; Garcia, L.; Cooper, P.J. et al. Geographic distribution of human Blastocystis subtypes in South America. Infect. Genet. Evol.; 2016; 41, pp. 32-35. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2016.03.017] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27034056]
31. Khaled, S.; Gantois, N.; Ayoubi, A.; Even, G.; Sawant, M.; El Houmayraa, J.; Nabot, M.; Benamrouz-Vanneste, S.; Chabé, M.; Certad, G. et al. Blastocystis sp. prevalence and subtypes distribution amongst Syrian refugee communities living in North Lebanon. Microorganisms; 2021; 9, 184. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9010184]
32. Osario-Pulgarin, M.I.; Higuera, A.; Beltran-Alzate, J.C.; Sanchez-Jimenez, M.; Ramirez, J.D. Epidemiological and molecular characterization of Blastocystis infection in children attending daycare centers in Medellin, Colombia. Biology; 2021; 10, 669. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology10070669] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34356524]
33. Jinatham, V.; Maxamhud, S.; Popluechai, S.; Tsaousis, A.D.; Gentekaki, E. Blastocystis One Health approach in a rural community of Northern Thailand: Prevalence, subtypes and novel transmission routes. Front. Microbiol.; 2021; 12, 746340. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.746340] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34956115]
34. Wang, W.; Owen, H.; Traub, R.J.; Cuttell, L.; Inpankaew, T.; Bielefeldt-Ohmann, H. Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis in pigs and their in-contact humans in Southeast Queensland, Australia, and Cambodia. Vet. Parasitol.; 2014; 203, pp. 264-269. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.04.006] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24785292]
35. Greige, S.; El Safadi, D.; Bécu, N.; Gantois, N.; Pereira, B.; Chabé, M.; Benamrouz-Vanneste, S.; Certad, G.; El Hage, R.; Chemaly, M. et al. Prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. isolates from poultry in Lebanon and evidence of zoonotic potential. Parasit. Vectors; 2018; 11, 389. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2975-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29973261]
36. Cheng, H.-S.; Haung, Z.-F.; Lan, W.-H.; Kuo, T.-C.; Shin, J.-W. Epidemiology of Blastocystis hominis and other intestinal parasites in a Vietnamese female immigrant population in southern Taiwan. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci.; 2006; 22, pp. 166-169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70302-X] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16679297]
37. Lu, C.T.; Sung, Y.J. Epidemiology of Blastocystis hominis and other intestinal parasites among the immigrant population in northeastern Taiwan by routine physical examination for residence approval. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect.; 2009; 42, pp. 505-509.
38. Stensvold, C.R.; Arendrup, M.C.; Jespersgaard, C.; Molbak, K.; Nielsen, H.V. Detecting Blastocystis using parasitologic and DNA-based methods: A comparative study. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.; 2007; 59, pp. 303-307. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.06.003]
39. Poirier, P.; Wawrzyniak, I.; Albert, A.; El Alaoui, H.; Delbac, F.; Livrelli, V. Development and evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for detection and quantification of Blastocystis parasites in human stool samples: Prospective study of patients with hematological malignancies. J. Clin. Microbiol.; 2011; 49, pp. 975-983. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01392-10]
40. Naguib, D.; Gantois, N.; Desramaut, J.; Arafat, N.; Even, G.; Certad, G.; Chabé, M.; Viscogliosi, E. Prevalence, subtype distribution and zoonotic significance of Blastocystis sp. isolates from poultry, cattle and pets in Northern Egypt. Microorganisms; 2022; 10, 2259. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10112259]
41. Noradilah, S.A.; Lee, I.L.; Anuar, T.S.; Salleh, F.M.; Manap, S.N.A.A.; Mohtar, N.S.H.M.; Azrul, S.M.; Abdullah, W.O.; Moktar, N. Occurrence of Blastocystis sp. in water catchments at Malay villages and aboriginal settlement during wet and dry seasons in Peninsular Malaysia. Peer J.; 2016; 4, e2541. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2541] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27761331]
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Trung Thanh Hoang 1 ; Bong Thi Do 1 ; Desramaut, Jeremy 2 ; Naguib, Doaa 3
; Tran, Tuan Ngoc 1 ; Truong, Anh Duc 1 ; Even, Gaël 4
; Certad, Gabriela 5
; Chabé, Magali 2
; Viscogliosi, Eric 2
1 Family Hospital, 73 Nguyen Huu Tho Street, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
2 Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019–UMR 9017–CIIL–Centre d’Infection et d’Immunité de Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
3 Department of Hygiene and Zoonoses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
4 GD Biotech-Gènes Diffusion, F-59000 Lille, France; PEGASE-Biosciences (Plateforme d’Expertises Génomiques Appliquées aux Sciences Expérimentales), Institut Pasteur de Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
5 Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019–UMR 9017–CIIL–Centre d’Infection et d’Immunité de Lille, F-59000 Lille, France; Délégation à la Recherche Clinique et à l’Innovation, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l’Institut Catholique de Lille, F-59000 Lille, France