Background
Surgical randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are acknowledged to be particularly challenging to conduct and recruit to. Within a programme of research to understand and optimise recruitment to RCTs, we undertook qualitative research in the By-Band RCT (comparison of gastric bypass and gastric band operations for morbid obesity).
Methods
In Phase I, challenges to recruitment were explored through thematic analysis of a) interviews with trial staff and recruiters and b) audio-recordings and observations of recruitment appointments. In Phase II, anonymised findings presented to recruiters in group and individual feedback sessions led to changes in information provision and logistical aspects of recruitment.
Results
In Phase I, interview data revealed recruiters’ varying levels of equipoise and preferences, and patient pathway charting identified complex clinical arrangements. Audio-recordings and observations of recruitment appointments highlighted five key challenges to recruitment: a) there was little discussion of By-Band b) By-Band was not well integrated into the clinical service c) eligibility assessment was unclear d) patient preferences were accepted at face value and e) information provision was not tailored to the patient. In Phase II, suggestions to recruiters included integrating the RCT within current service provision, streamlining eligibility assessment, exploring patient preferences, providing balanced and tailored information, and requesting patients to keep an open mind throughout the appointment. Recruitment rates increased from 4% prior to feedback to 30% and 64% in the two months following feedback. Research is on-going to further optimise recruitment.
Conclusion
Qualitative research methods are well placed to optimise recruitment rates in surgical RCTs.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© Paramasivan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
1 University of Bristol, School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK (GRID:grid.5337.2) (ISNI:0000000419367603)
2 University of Bristol, School of Clinical Sciences, Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol, UK (GRID:grid.5337.2) (ISNI:0000000419367603)