Implementing clinical trials involving participants with diminished capacity, such as elderly residents in care homes, stroke survivors, those with a learning disability, can be challenging in terms of balancing complex service and patient needs with methodological rigor. The key challenges identified here are the appropriate tailoring of recruitment approaches, data collection and participant risk monitoring.
Optimising the consent process for those with varying levels of comprehension and communication is complex. For example, conducting research with participants with dementia requires special consideration around the salient points for inclusion in information sheets (including multiple versions to cater for varying levels of capacity) and utilising different formats to aid communications. Consideration also needs to be given to optimising provision of information to consultees where capacity is lacking.
Data collection strategies need to be adapted to ensure understanding, to utilise appropriate data sources and maximise data return. Participants may have limited ability to provide self-report data, and the way in which they are able to respond will vary. Simplified tools, visual prompt aids, or the collection of proxy data should all be considered. There is also the need to be vigilant for other issues arising from research with this population, such as safe guarding concerns, which will require specialised researcher training and clear onward reporting processes.
We will describe and discuss how trials involving populations at risk of diminished capacity have adapted their recruitment strategies, data collection approaches, and linked with service providers to ensure participant safety.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© Farrin et al. 2015. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
1 University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000000419368403)
2 Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.10346.30) (ISNI:0000000107458880)