Full text

Turn on search term navigation

© The Author(s). 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

Background

Within the field of plastic surgery, free tissue transfer is common practice for knee and lower leg defects. Usually, after such free flap reconstruction, patients undergo a dangling protocol in the postoperative phase. A dangling protocol is designed to gradually subject the free flap to increased venous pressure resulting from gravitational forces. Worldwide there are multiple variations of dangling protocols. However, there is no evidence available in the literature that supports the use of a dangling protocol.

Methods

This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial that includes patients with a free flap lower leg reconstruction. The primary outcome is to assess whether a no-dangling protocol is not inferior to a dangling protocol, in terms of proportion of partial flap loss, 6 months after surgery. Secondary objectives are to identify differences in major and minor complications, length of stay, and costs, and to objectify blood gaseous changes during dangling. Furthermore, at 2 years we will assess difference in physical function, infection rates, and osseous union rates.

Discussion

The primary outcome of this study will give a more decisive answer to the question of whether a dangling protocol is necessary after a free flap reconstruction of the lower leg. The secondary outcomes of this study will provide a better insight into the physical functions, infection rates, and union rates in these patients.

Trial registration

Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO), NL63146.041.17. Registered on 11 July 2018. Netherlands Trial Register, NTR7545. Registered on 10 October 2018.

Details

Title
Is dangling of the lower leg after a free flap reconstruction necessary? Study protocol for a large multicenter randomized controlled study
Author
Krijgh, David D. 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Teunis, Teun 1 ; Schellekens, Pascal P. A. 1 ; Mureau, Marc A. M. 2 ; Luijsterburg, Antonius J. M. 2 ; Tempelman, Tallechien M. T. 3 ; van der Beek, Eva S. J. 3 ; Maarse, Wiesje 1 ; Coert, J. Henk 1 

 University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Utrecht, the Netherlands (GRID:grid.7692.a) (ISNI:0000000090126352) 
 Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (GRID:grid.5645.2) (ISNI:000000040459992X) 
 University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Groningen, the Netherlands (GRID:grid.4494.d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9558 4598) 
Pages
558
Publication year
2019
Publication date
Dec 2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
e-ISSN
17456215
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2795256446
Copyright
© The Author(s). 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.