It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Transorbital sonography (TOS) could be a swift and convenient method to detect the atrophy of the optic nerve, possibly providing a marker that might reflect other quantitative structural markers of multiple sclerosis (MS). Here we evaluate the utility of TOS as a complementary tool for assessing optic nerve atrophy, and investigate how TOS-derived measures correspond to volumetric brain markers in MS. We recruited 25 healthy controls (HC) and 45 patients with relapsing–remitting MS and performed B-mode ultrasonographic examination of the optic nerve. Patients additionally underwent MRI scans to obtain T1-weighted, FLAIR and STIR images. Optic nerve diameters (OND) were compared between HC, MS patients with and without history of optic neuritis (non-ON) using a mixed-effects ANOVA model. The relationship between within-subject-average OND and global and regional brain volumetric measures was investigated using FSL SIENAX, voxel-based morphometry and FSL FIRST. OND was significantly different between HC-MS (HC = 3.2 ± 0.4 mm, MS = 3 ± 0.4 mm; p < 0.019) and we found significant correlation between average OND and normalised whole brain (β = 0.42, p < 0.005), grey matter (β = 0.33, p < 0.035), white matter (β = 0.38, p < 0.012) and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid volume (β = − 0.36, p < 0.021) in the MS group. History of ON had no impact on the association between OND and volumetric data. In conclusion, OND is a promising surrogate marker in MS, that can be simply and reliably measured using TOS, and its derived measures correspond to brain volumetric measures. It should be further explored in larger and longitudinal studies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Szeged, Department of Radiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Center, Szeged, Hungary (GRID:grid.9008.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1016 9625)
2 University of Szeged, Department of Psychiatry, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Center, Szeged, Hungary (GRID:grid.9008.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1016 9625); University Hospital Essen, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen, Germany (GRID:grid.410718.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0262 7331)
3 University of Szeged, Department of Radiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Center, Szeged, Hungary (GRID:grid.9008.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1016 9625); Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.4714.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0626)
4 University of Szeged, Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Center, Szeged, Hungary (GRID:grid.9008.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1016 9625)
5 University of Szeged, Department of Radiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Center, Szeged, Hungary (GRID:grid.9008.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1016 9625); University of Szeged, Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Center, Szeged, Hungary (GRID:grid.9008.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1016 9625)