It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
During the Pleistocene, Earth’s climate changed dramatically. The mid-Pleistocene transition (MPT; ~1.3–0.7 million years (Ma)) featured an important ice volume increase at both poles. The evolution of large Arctic ice sheets caused the sequestration of methane as free gas and hydrates in subseabed sediments. Ice volume changes, associated with variable pressures and temperatures, perturbed those giant reservoirs, causing methane leakages. Here, we present borehole data from the Arctic–Atlantic gateway region, providing foraminiferal stable carbon isotope and source-specific biomarker evidence that reveals three main seafloor leakage episodes that occurred prior to and across the mid-Pleistocene transition. By combining borehole data with hydrate stability modelling, we propose that tectonic stress changes associated with large ice volume early build-up and wastage during the mid-Pleistocene controlled episodic methane leakages from subsurface reservoirs. Our data indicate methane release, showing a potential scenario for vast Arctic areas storing methane that are now affected by ongoing ice volume decrease.
Episodic methane leakage events from the seafloor of the Arctic–Atlantic gateway region occurred before and during the mid-Pleistocene transition, suggesting foraminiferal stable carbon isotope and source-specific biomarker analyses of borehole samples.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 UiT The Arctic University of Norway, CAGE – Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate, Department of Geosciences, Tromsø, Norway (GRID:grid.10919.30) (ISNI:0000000122595234)
2 UiT The Arctic University of Norway, CAGE – Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate, Department of Geosciences, Tromsø, Norway (GRID:grid.10919.30) (ISNI:0000000122595234); Geological Survey of Norway, Trondheim, Norway (GRID:grid.438521.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 1034 0453)
3 Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India, National Centre for Polar and Ocean Research (NCPOR), Goa, India (GRID:grid.464957.d)
4 UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Department of Geosciences, Tromsø, Norway (GRID:grid.10919.30) (ISNI:0000000122595234); JBA Risk Management, Skipton, UK (GRID:grid.10919.30)
5 EAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Kastanienbaum, Switzerland (GRID:grid.418656.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 1551 0562)