It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Phosphogypsum (PG) is a solid waste produced from decomposition of phosphate rock in sulfuric acid. It can improve the physicochemical properties of soil. However, the application of PG will inevitably change the living environment of soil microorganisms and lead to the evolution of the soil microbial community. The effects of PG (0, 0.01%, 0.1%, 1%, 10% PG) on soil respiration, enzyme activity and microbial community were studied systematically by indoor incubation experiments. The results showed that the addition of 0.01% PG had little effect on the soil physicochemical properties and microflora. The soil respiration rate decreased with the increase of PG; The activities of catalase, urease and phosphatase were decreased and the activities of sucrase were increased by 10% PG treatment, while 0.01% or 0.1% PG treatment improve the urease activity; Soil microbial community response was significantly separated by amount of the PG amendment, and the application of 10% PG reduced the abundance, diversity and evenness of soil bacteria and fungi. Redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that soil bacterial composition was mainly driven by electrical conductivity (EC) and Ca2+, while fungal composition was mainly driven by F− and NH4+. In addition, the application of PG increased the abundance of salt-tolerant microorganisms and accelerated the degradation of soil organic matter. Overall, These results can help to revisit the current management of PG applications as soil amendments.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Guizhou University, Key Laboratory of Guizhou Province for Green Chemical Industry and Clean Energy Technology, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guiyang, China (GRID:grid.443382.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1804 268X); Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Duyun, China (GRID:grid.464387.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1791 6939)
2 Guizhou University, Engineering Research Center of Efficient Utilization for Industrial Waste, Guiyang, China (GRID:grid.443382.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1804 268X)
3 Guizhou University, Key Laboratory of Guizhou Province for Green Chemical Industry and Clean Energy Technology, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guiyang, China (GRID:grid.443382.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1804 268X)
4 Guizhou Research Institute of Chemical Industry, Guiyang, China (GRID:grid.495708.7)
5 Guizhou University, Key Laboratory of Guizhou Province for Green Chemical Industry and Clean Energy Technology, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guiyang, China (GRID:grid.443382.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1804 268X); Guizhou University, Engineering Research Center of Efficient Utilization for Industrial Waste, Guiyang, China (GRID:grid.443382.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1804 268X)