Introduction
Leishmaniasis is a parasitic disease caused by over 20 species of Leishmania. Transmission is mainly via sandfly bites infected with promastigotes [1]. Other reported transmission mechanisms are vertical transmission through the placenta from mother to child, by sexual intercourse, blood transfusion, and occupationally acquired by direct inoculation into the skin [2]. Clinical manifestations vary from self-limited cutaneous disease to a life-threatening visceral infection, depending on the parasite species, vector, biology, and host’s immune response [1]. We present a case of an accidental direct inoculation of Leishmania panamensis.
Case presentation
In November 2021, a 29-year-old otherwise healthy dermatology resident treated a Haitian immigrant patient with a presumptive diagnosis of an infectious dermatosis. She performed a skin biopsy on the patient and suffered an accidental needlestick injury on the left index finger. The protocol for the management of needlestick and sharps-related injuries was implemented; blood tests, including a panel for HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C virus, had no significant findings. The Haitian patient was diagnosed with mucocutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania panamensis, and treatment was established with liposomal amphotericin B at 3 mg/kg per day intravenously (IV) for 10 days, followed by meglumine antimoniate at 20 mg/kg per day IV for 28 days, with complete remission. In January 2022, 2 months after the puncture, the resident developed an erythematous, painless papule at the point of inoculation (Fig 1A). Dermoscopy showed an erythematous background with a yellowish hue, central ulceration, peripheral white lines, and dotted vessels (Fig 1B). Over 3 weeks, the lesion worsened, increased in size, and presented a central ulcer and small satellite papular lesions. Painful enlargement of ipsilateral lymph nodes along her left forearm was also noted. A skin biopsy was compatible with leishmaniasis (Fig 1C). A 20-day treatment with meglumine antimoniate, at 20 mg/kg per day IV, was established. After completing treatment, a small defect remained, so three additional doses of 1 ml intralesional meglumine antimoniate were administered. A week after the last injection, the ulcer had healed completely. At the 6-month follow-up, both patients remain asymptomatic.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 1.
(a) Erythematous papule with central ulceration on the proximal phalanx of the left index finger, at the puncture site before treatment. (b) Dermoscopy shows erythema with a yellowish hue, central ulceration, peripheral white lines, and dotted vascular structures. (c) Histologic findings evidenced a dermal lymphohistiocytic infiltrate with amastigote organisms within histiocytes (hematoxylin & eosin; original magnification ×40).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011150.g001
Discussion
Leishmaniasis is a neglected tropical disease that mainly affects people from underdeveloped countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), around 700,000 to 1,000,000 new cases occur annually. It is associated with malnutrition, population displacement, poor housing, unsanitary conditions, a weak immune system, and a lack of financial resources [3].
Although the most common transmission mechanism is by female sandflies’ bite, cases of direct cutaneous inoculation have been reported in the literature [4–7], thereby making it an occupational infection. Occupational infections are defined by a particular infectious agent or organism associated with an occupational setting and specific work activities that predispose to exposure and, therefore, to the infection [8].
Healthcare workers who are in contact with patients and/or their body fluids are at risk of occupational infections with subsequent risk of contracting diseases, disability, and even death [9]. Education towards the principles and practices for the prevention of the transmission of infectious disease should begin during training in healthcare professionals. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has guidelines for preventing the transmission of infectious diseases in the healthcare workplace, including needlestick and other sharps-related injury prevention programs [10]. No specific statements are made for leishmaniasis.
When encountering cutaneous leishmaniasis, healthcare workers should keep this mechanism of transmission in mind and implement contact and needle precautions. When suspecting an infectious etiology, skin biopsies of ulcerated lesions should be allowed to heal by secondary intention rather than suturing since friable tissue could easily tear and cause poor control of needles and other sharps. Furthermore, in the case of an accidental puncture, bearing in mind the morphology and natural evolution of cutaneous leishmaniasis could be crucial for diagnosis and, thus, prompt treatment.
Conclusions
Here, we present the case of a healthcare provider who suffered from an accidental autoinoculation with a needle contaminated by Leishmania organisms. This case serves as a reminder that health providers should have the proper training and knowledge of their hospital management protocol for occupational injuries. Moreover, physicians should remember that leishmaniasis is not exclusively transmitted by sandfly vectors but also by direct inoculation in a clinical setting.
Ethics statement
Informed written consent was obtained for clinical photographs.
Citation: Perales-González A, Pérez-Garza DM, Garza-Dávila VF, Ocampo-Candiani J (2023) Cutaneous leishmaniasis by a needlestick injury, an occupational infection? PLoS Negl Trop Dis 17(3): e0011150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011150
1. Burza S, Croft SL, Boelaert M. Leishmaniasis. Lancet. 2018 Sep 15;392(10151):951–970. pmid:30126638
2. Dey A, Singh S. Transfusion transmitted leishmaniasis: a case report and review of literature. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006 Jul;24(3):165–70. pmid:16912434
3. World Health Organization. Leishmaniasis [cited 2022 Aug]. In: World Health Organization [Internet]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/leishmaniasis
4. Evans TG, Pearson RD. Clinical and immunological responses following accidental inoculation of Leishmania donovani. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1988;82(6):854–6. pmid:3256987
5. Felinto de Brito ME, Andrade MS, de Almeida EL, Medeiros AC, Werkhäuser RP, de Araújo AI, et al. Occupationally acquired American cutaneous leishmaniasis. Case Rep Dermatol Med. 2012;2012:279517. pmid:23227369
6. Freedman DO, MacLean JD, Viloria JB. A case of laboratory acquired Leishmania donovani infection; evidence for primary lymphatic dissemination. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1987;81(1):118–9. pmid:2832980
7. Knobloch J, Demar M. Accidental Leishmania mexicana infection in an immunosuppressed laboratory technician. Trop Med Int Health. 1997 Dec;2(12):1152–5. pmid:9438471
8. Aw T, Blair I, Babcock H. Occupational Infections. In: Cohen J, Opal SM, Powderly WG, editors. Infectious diseases. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 647–55.
9. Subramanian GC, Arip M, Saraswathy Subramaniam TS. Knowledge and Risk Perceptions of Occupational Infections Among Health-care Workers in Malaysia. Saf Health Work. 2017 Sep;8(3):246–9. pmid:28951800
10. Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L. 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Healthcare Settings. Am J Infect Control. 2007;35(10 Suppl 2):S65–164. pmid:18068815
About the Authors:
Alejandra Perales-González
Contributed equally to this work with: Alejandra Perales-González, Daniela Michelle Pérez-Garza, Valeria Fernanda Garza-Dávila, Jorge Ocampo-Candiani
Roles Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario “Dr. José Eleuterio González,” Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, México
Daniela Michelle Pérez-Garza
Contributed equally to this work with: Alejandra Perales-González, Daniela Michelle Pérez-Garza, Valeria Fernanda Garza-Dávila, Jorge Ocampo-Candiani
Roles Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario “Dr. José Eleuterio González,” Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, México
Valeria Fernanda Garza-Dávila
Contributed equally to this work with: Alejandra Perales-González, Daniela Michelle Pérez-Garza, Valeria Fernanda Garza-Dávila, Jorge Ocampo-Candiani
Roles Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario “Dr. José Eleuterio González,” Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, México
Jorge Ocampo-Candiani
Contributed equally to this work with: Alejandra Perales-González, Daniela Michelle Pérez-Garza, Valeria Fernanda Garza-Dávila, Jorge Ocampo-Candiani
Roles Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
* E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliation: Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario “Dr. José Eleuterio González,” Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, México
ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-0031
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2023 Perales-González et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Leishmaniasis is a parasitic disease caused by over 20 species of Leishmania. Transmission is mainly via sandfly bites infected with promastigotes, through the placenta from mother to child, by sexual intercourse, blood transfusion, and occupationally acquired by direct inoculation into the skin. Clinical manifestations vary from self-limited cutaneous disease to a life-threatening visceral infection. In November 2021, a 29-year-old otherwise healthy dermatology resident suffered an accidental needlestick injury while performing a biopsy on a patient with a presumptive diagnosis of an infectious dermatosis, later confirmed as mucocutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania panamensis. Later, the resident developed an erythematous, painless papule at the point of inoculation, with a central ulcer and painful enlargement of ipsilateral lymph nodes. Biopsy was compatible with leishmaniasis. After completing a 20-day treatment with meglumine antimoniate, the ulcer had healed completely. At the 6-month follow-up, both patients remain asymptomatic. This case serves as a reminder that health providers should have the proper training and knowledge of their hospital management protocol for occupational injuries. Moreover, physicians should bear in mind that leishmaniasis is not exclusively transmitted by sandfly vectors.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer