It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Urban innovation is essential for advancing economic growth, competitiveness and sustainability in cities. Government engagement – especially through official site visits – acts as a key catalyst by driving targeted policy interventions and reallocating resources. Despite its promise, the effect of official site visits on urban innovation remains underexplored, and the roles of mediating and moderating factors are not fully understood. This study evaluates the impact of official site visits on urban innovation in China. Using a comprehensive panel dataset of Chinese enterprises from 2011 to 2017 – which includes official visit records, innovation indicators, technology education expenditure, firm-level innovation inputs and outputs, and marketisation levels – we apply fixed-effects regression models augmented by instrumental variable techniques and propensity score matching to address endogeneity and selection bias. We apply a recursive path analysis to reveal how fiscal allocations to science and education mediate the effect of official site visits on urban innovation. Our moderation analysis reveals that these effects are stronger in regions with higher marketisation and greater government efficiency. Moreover, our heterogeneity analyses indicate that visits directed at innovative enterprises and conducted by higher-level officials produce even stronger innovation outcomes. This research provides novel empirical evidence on government-led innovation initiatives and offers practical policy recommendations to better align government support with enterprise innovation needs.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , People’s Republic of China
2 UniSA Business, University of South Australia , Adelaide , Australia
3 Antai College of Economics & Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , People’s Republic of China




