It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The European Union (EU) will implement a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to reach its climate mitigation targets while avoiding the relocation of its industries to countries with less stringent climate policies (carbon leakage). The exact implementation and possible future extensions of such an EU CBAM are still being debated. Here we apply a throughflow-based accounting method on detailed trade network data to assess the coverage of different implementation options. Using a stylized comprehensive EU CBAM as benchmark, we then quantify how an EU CBAM may affect the EU’s trade partners by channeling the EU carbon price to other countries. We find that middle- and low-income countries for which the EU is an important export market would be disproportionally impacted even under conservative implementation options. We finally explore different international revenue recycling schemes to make the EU CBAM inclusive toward vulnerable countries and able to foster global climate cooperation.
Middle- and low-income countries may be disproportionately impacted by the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism even under conservative implementation options, according to throughflow-based accounting and trade network data analysis.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany (GRID:grid.4556.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0493 9031); Potsdam University, Institute of Physics, Potsdam, Germany (GRID:grid.11348.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0942 1117)
2 Leiden University, Institute of Environmental Science (CML), Department of Industrial Ecology, Leiden, Netherlands (GRID:grid.5132.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2312 1970); Mercator Research Institute for Global Commons and Climate Change, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.506488.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0582 7760)
3 Mercator Research Institute for Global Commons and Climate Change, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.506488.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0582 7760); Ecologic Institute, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.22859.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 0467 2445)
4 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany (GRID:grid.4556.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0493 9031); Mercator Research Institute for Global Commons and Climate Change, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.506488.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0582 7760)