Abstract

Network neuroscience provides important insights into brain function by analyzing complex networks constructed from diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (dMRI), functional MRI (fMRI) and Electro/Magnetoencephalography (E/MEG) data. However, in order to ensure that results are reproducible, we need a better understanding of within- and between-subject variability over long periods of time. Here, we analyze a longitudinal, 8 session, multi-modal (dMRI, and simultaneous EEG-fMRI), and multiple task imaging data set. We first confirm that across all modalities, within-subject reproducibility is higher than between-subject reproducibility. We see high variability in the reproducibility of individual connections, but observe that in EEG-derived networks, during both rest and task, alpha-band connectivity is consistently more reproducible than connectivity in other frequency bands. Structural networks show a higher reliability than functional networks across network statistics, but synchronizability and eigenvector centrality are consistently less reliable than other network measures across all modalities. Finally, we find that structural dMRI networks outperform functional networks in their ability to identify individuals using a fingerprinting analysis. Our results highlight that functional networks likely reflect state-dependent variability not present in structural networks, and that the type of analysis should depend on whether or not one wants to take into account state-dependent fluctuations in connectivity.

Details

Title
Within-subject reproducibility varies in multi-modal, longitudinal brain networks
Author
Nakuci, Johan 1 ; Wasylyshyn, Nick 2 ; Cieslak, Matthew 3 ; Elliott, James C. 3 ; Bansal, Kanika 4 ; Giesbrecht, Barry 5 ; Grafton, Scott T. 5 ; Vettel, Jean M. 6 ; Garcia, Javier O. 2 ; Muldoon, Sarah F. 7 

 University at Buffalo, SUNY, Neuroscience Program, Buffalo, USA (GRID:grid.273335.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9887); Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Psychology, Atlanta, USA (GRID:grid.213917.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4943) 
 U.S. CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, USA (GRID:grid.420176.6); University of Pennsylvania, Department of Bioengineering, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972) 
 University of California, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Santa Barbara, USA (GRID:grid.133342.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9676) 
 U.S. CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, USA (GRID:grid.420176.6); Columbia University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, New York, USA (GRID:grid.21729.3f) (ISNI:0000000419368729) 
 University of California, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Santa Barbara, USA (GRID:grid.133342.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9676); University of California, Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies, Santa Barbara, USA (GRID:grid.133342.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9676) 
 U.S. CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, USA (GRID:grid.420176.6); University of Pennsylvania, Department of Bioengineering, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of California, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Santa Barbara, USA (GRID:grid.133342.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9676) 
 University at Buffalo, SUNY, Neuroscience Program, Buffalo, USA (GRID:grid.273335.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9887); University at Buffalo, SUNY, Department of Mathematics and CDSE Program, Buffalo, USA (GRID:grid.273335.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9887) 
Pages
6699
Publication year
2023
Publication date
2023
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2805294620
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.