Clinical predictors of mortality in patients with pseudomonas aeruginosa infection

Abstract

Background

Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa are difficult to treat with a significant cost and burden. In Lebanon, P. aeruginosa is one of the most common organisms in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). P. aeruginosa has developed widespread resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents such as fluoroquinolones and carbapenems. We aimed at identifying risk factors associated for P. aeruginosa infections as well as identifying independent risk factors for developing septic shock and in-hospital mortality.

Methods

We used a cross-sectional study design where we included patients with documented P. aeruginosa cultures who developed an infection after obtaining written consent. Two multivariable regression models were used to determine independent predictors of septic shock and mortality.

Results

During the observed period of 30 months 196 patients were recruited. The most common predisposing factor was antibiotic use for more than 48 hours within 30 days (55%). The prevalence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa was 10%. The strongest predictors of mortality were steroid use (aOR = 3.4), respiratory failure (aOR = 7.3), identified respiratory cultures (aOR = 6.0), malignancy (aOR = 9.8), septic shock (aOR = 18.6), and hemodialysis (aOR = 30.9).

Conclusion

Understanding resistance patterns and risk factors associated with mortality is crucial to personalize treatment based on risk level and to decrease the emerging threat of antimicrobial resistance.

Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an increasingly recognized pathogen worldwide, particularly in hospital-acquired infections (HAI). Invasive infections due to P. aeruginosa are often difficult to treat [1, 2], and this is evident in cases of bacteremia, pneumonia, bloodstream infections, and intra-abdominal infections [3]. P. aeruginosa is a leading pathogen in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) globally [4]. In Lebanon, a recent study determined P. aeruginosa to be the second most common pathogen isolated in VAP [5]. P. aeruginosa infections are associated with a significant burden and cost. For instance, the additional cost of a single case of P. aeruginosa pneumonia has been estimated to be 19,000 Euros in a German teaching hospital [1]. P. aeruginosa easily acquires resistance to commonly used antimicrobial agents [6, 7]. In Lebanon, carbapenem resistance among P. aeruginosa isolates is estimated to be 28% [8]. This is consistent with regional data, with carbapenem resistance reaching 56% in Libya, 51% in Egypt, and 93% in Jordan [9].

There are established clinical risk factors associated with P. aeruginosa infections, such as previous hospital admission, history of antibiotic use, and ventilator use [6]. In a recent study, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay was also shown to predispose to P. aeruginosa infections, particularly with resistant strains [3]. As pseudomonal infections are often associated with high mortality rates, studies have examined risk factors for mortality and have found independent predictors, such as multi-drug resistance, neutropenia, increased Pitt bacteremia score, and delay in therapy [10].

The aim of this study is to quantify the mortality risk in hospitalized patients with P. aeruginosa infections by developing a risk score. This would allow clinicians to gauge the individual mortality risk for their patients based on easily obtainable clinical data. Such patients could benefit from more aggressive treatment and close follow-up.

Materials and methods

Study design

This prospective chart review study from 2017 to 2020 involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Institutional Review Board of the American University of Beirut, a tertiary healthcare institution in Lebanon approved this study. Written consents were obtained. Study subjects were hospitalized adult patients with documented P. aeruginosa infections for which treatment was initiated. We classified these hospitalized patients based on where the infection was acquired (community-acquired, hospital-acquired, or healthcare-associated). Infections were considered community-acquired if they manifested outside the hospital or were diagnosed within 48 hours of admission without any healthcare encounter in the past 30 days. Hospital-acquired infection was defined as an infection that manifested 48 hours or more after hospital admission or within 7 days of discharge. Healthcare-associated infection was defined as an infection occurring in patients receiving home and/or ambulatory intravenous therapy, chemotherapy, hemodialysis, wound care, specialized nursing care, or who had attended a hospital clinic within the last 30 days; patients hospitalized in an acute care hospital for ≥ 2 days within the last 90 days; and those residing in a nursing home or long-term care facility. Patients were included in the study only once, taking into consideration the first P. aeruginosa infection within the study period. Recurrent P. aeruginosa infections and subsequent hospitalizations were accounted for as complications. Patients who were deemed to be colonized with P. aeruginosa were excluded. We relied on the assessment of the infectious diseases consult service in determining infection vs. colonization. In general, patients were considered infected if they displayed typical infection symptoms, such as fever, and symptoms related to the infection type. In case of any uncertainty, another study researcher would have reassessed the eligibility of the patient.

Subject enrollment

The study coordinators were notified daily by the clinical microbiology laboratory of clinical specimens growing P. aeruginosa. After obtaining written consent, the medical records of study subjects were reviewed, collecting data on demographics, comorbidities, previous antibiotic use, as well as treatment, complications, and outcome. Based on the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), multi-drug resistance (MDR) is defined as P. aeruginosa not susceptible to at least one antibiotic in at least three antibiotic classes for which P. aeruginosa susceptibility is generally expected: penicillins, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and carbapenems [11]. Difficult-to-treat (DTR) resistance is defined as P. aeruginosa exhibiting non-susceptibility to all of the following: piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, meropenem, imipenem-cilastatin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin [12].

Statistical analysis

The independent samples T-test was used to compare continuous variables and Pearson’s Chi-Square test was used to compare categorical variables. Backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression was used for independent association testing while controlling for potential confounders. The logistic model included all variables with a p-value of 0.2 or less obtained on bivariable analysis. The variables that were significant in the mortality model were used to create a clinical scoring system to estimate the mortality due to P. aeruginosa infections. Each variable was assigned several points based on its respective adjusted odds ratio obtained on multivariable analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the best cutoff score. The data was analyzed using SPSS^® for Windows, version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

During the observed period of 30 months, 196 patients were recruited for the study. Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of these patients. There was a slight male predominance among the study subjects (58.7%), and the average age was 65.4 ± 19.0 years. The mean Charlson comorbidity index was relatively low at 5.6 ± 3.2. The most common pre-existing condition was hypoalbuminemia (46.8%) followed by malignancy (39.8%). Infections were hospital-acquired in half of the cases, community acquired in one quarter of the cases, and healthcare associated in the remaining quarter. Among the hospital-acquired infections, 40% were acquired in the medical wards, 32% in the intensive care unit, and 20% in the surgical wards.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Among patients who had received antibiotics within 30 days for more than 48 hours before infection, 74.0% had received anti-pseudomonal antibiotics and 27.6% grew a strain of P. aeruginosa that was resistant to the antibiotic received. The results stratified by antibiotic class are summarized in Table 2.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

P. aeruginosa isolates were recovered most frequently from respiratory specimens (48.0%), followed by urine (20.3%), and blood (7.7%), and in 24.0% of cases, the organism was isolated from various other sources including wounds, abdominal fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, and skin abscesses. In healthcare-associated infections, 10 were from urine, 23 from respiratory specimens, 3 from blood, and 12 from other sources. We did not find any statistical difference in the distribution of the types of infection by place of acquisition (hospital, healthcare, or community). Most P. aeruginosa isolates were sensitive to 3 or more classes of antibiotics (177/196; MDR 10%). The highest overall proportion of susceptibility was for respiratory isolates (93%) and the lowest was for blood isolates (78%). Overall carbapenem susceptibility was 82% among all isolates. DTR was detected in 6/196 isolates (3.1%).

The most commonly prescribed empiric therapy while awaiting culture results was piperacillin-tazobactam in 33% of cases, followed by meropenem (24%), and ciprofloxacin (14%), ceftazidime (9%), and cefepime (7%). A single dose of amikacin was used as adjunctive treatment in 14% of the cases. Ciprofloxacin was the most used antibiotic for directed therapy (40%), and ceftazidime (18%), followed by levofloxacin (11%), piperacillin-tazobactam (8.5%) and cefepime (7.5%). Average duration of empirical therapy was 7.3 days ± 6.9, and that of directed therapy was 10.6 days ± 8.4. Patients who received dual antipseudomonal therapy had their complications subsequently analyzed and compared to those who received monotherapy. Based on our hospital care practices, patients are generally treated with dual anti-pseudomonal therapy if the organism is multidrug-resistant, and in the setting of severe sepsis, neutropenia with bacteremia, and severe pneumonia in ICU. The results shown in Table 3 clearly indicate that dual antipseudomonal therapy was associated with significantly fewer complications and fewer deaths.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

The most common complications encountered were the acquisition of a hospital-acquired infection other than the index infection (28.1%), admission to the intensive care unit (27.0%), sepsis (26.0%), recurrent infection (21.2%), and septic shock (18.9%). In-hospital mortality was 19.4% and mortality was attributed to infection in 26.3% of all patients who died. Mortality was highest when the initial source of infection was pneumonia (30.9%), compared to 15.0% for urinary tract infections, and 6.7% for primary bacteremia. Backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression was performed to test independent risk factors for mortality (Table 4). On bivariable analysis, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and ICU admission were associated with a worse outcome. However, this relationship was no longer significant when we adjusted for confounders. A total of 53/196 (27.0%) patients required ICU admission. With a p-value of 0.011, ICU mortality was 17/55 (30.9%) and non-ICU mortality was 21/196 (17.5%). The baseline variable with the strongest independent association with death was hemodialysis (aOR = 30.9; 95% CI 2.6–173.0). This was followed by malignancy (aOR = 9.8; 95% CI 2.6–37.6), positive respiratory culture (aOR = 6.0; 95% CI 1.5–24.2), and recent steroid therapy (aOR = 3.4; 95% CI 1.01–11.6). Other variables, classified as complication variables, were also independently associated with mortality and included septic shock, respiratory failure, and metastatic infection.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Using standard methods [13], a risk of mortality score was generated to assess the likelihood of dying from a P. aeruginosa infection. This proposed score was based on the 4 baseline variables. The lowest coefficient variable, recent use of steroids, was assigned 1 point. Isolation of P. aeruginosa from respiratory cultures was assigned 2 points, while malignancy was assigned 3 points, and hemodialysis 10 points, because their coefficients were 2, 3, and 10 times that of recent steroid use, respectively. The minimum possible score was 0 and the maximum score possible was 16. The predicted probability of death was 3.8% if no risk factors were present and increased with additional risk factors reaching a maximum of 89.7% at a risk score of 15 (Fig 1). The mean risk score was 2.36 ± 2.38 in the survival group and 5.08 ± 3.36 in the mortality group (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.801 (p < 0.001). ROC analysis of the mortality score showed that a cutoff of 1.5 points is appropriate to maximize sensitivity (100%) but not specificity (33.5%) in predicting mortality. On the other hand, a cutoff of 2.5 points maximizes both sensitivity (89.2%) and specificity (59.5%).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Pseudomonas mortality score = sum of individual risk factors (1 point for recent steroid use, 2 points for identified respiratory culture, 3 points for malignancy, 10 points for hemodialysis).

Discussion

Predicting the risk of clinical complications is a very important factor in the management of P. aeruginosa infections. The accurate prediction of the risk of mortality would help clinicians make specific and individualized management decisions. To our knowledge, this study represents the first prospective cohort study to report the clinical epidemiology of P. aeruginosa infections at a large tertiary care center in Lebanon, and the first to create a clinically relevant tool to assess an individual patient’s mortality risk.

The morbidity and mortality associated with P. aeruginosa infections underscore the importance of hospital infection control efforts, particularly since 50% of the infections in our cohort were acquired in the hospital. However, unlike other studies where most P. aeruginosa infections in the hospital are acquired in the intensive care unit (68.7%) [14], most of our nosocomial infections originated in the medical wards.

The ability of P. aeruginosa to acquire antimicrobial resistance has been extensively highlighted [15]. In our study, however, the prevalence of MDR P. aeruginosa was 10%, and DTR was very low at 3.1%, which is consistent with previous data from our center [8], but lower than what is reported from studies across Europe. In a nationwide Spanish survey, 17.3% of P. aeruginosa isolates were extensively-drug resistant and 26.2% were MDR [16], whereas, in France, the prevalence of MDR P. aeruginosa was 26.9% [17]. Reports on the prevalence of MDR isolates from the Middle East region also reveal a higher prevalence of MDR isolates. A 1-year retrospective cohort study found a prevalence of 16.3% of P. aeruginosa MDR isolates among critically ill patients in Saudi Arabia [18]. Another study from Egypt revealed a prevalence of 66.6% [19].

Almost half of our patients received an antibiotic for more than 48 hours within 30 days of developing an infection with P. aeruginosa. It has been previously shown that receiving piperacillin-tazobactam and/or cefepime in the month prior to the index infection is associated with infection with isolates resistant to these antibiotics [20]. In our study, receiving piperacillin-tazobactam was the least associated with developing an infection with an isolate resistant to this drug. However, in 50% of the cases, receiving cephalosporins for more than 48 hours before the index infection predicted the development of resistance to cephalosporins. There is a direct correlation between anti-pseudomonal antimicrobial use and the development of resistance among P. aeruginosa to certain classes of antibiotics [21, 22]. Djordjevic et al. studied the effect of cefepime withdrawal on the resistance rates of P. aeruginosa [23]. They found that with the withdrawal of cefepime and a decrease in ceftazidime utilization, there was a decrease in the resistance density of P. aeruginosa to carbapenems, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, and cefepime.

The tendency for P. aeruginosa to acquire antimicrobial resistance upon exposure to antibiotics has been one of the drivers for the use of combination therapy. It is proposed that combination therapy can prevent the development of resistance, although definitive evidence is still lacking [24]. Combination therapy also enhances the adequacy of empiric antimicrobial therapy and provides potential synergy between different classes of antibiotics which allows for enhanced bacterial killing [24]. A Spanish study looking at the effect of the extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotype on outcome found no effect of the XDR phenotype on 14- or 30-day mortality [25]. However, in the subgroup of patients with high-risk sources, combination therapy significant reduced 14-day mortality (HR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.33–0.93). Similar findings were reported from a recent systematic review, showing that combination therapies for MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa matched or outperformed monotherapy, and none were inferior to monotherapies [26]. In our study, all complications were significantly less frequent in the combination therapy arm. This finding, despite the low prevalence of resistance among our isolates, highlights the possibility of more efficient microbial killing with dual antipseudomonal therapy.

The in-hospital mortality rate that we observed (19%) is lower than what has been reported worldwide. For instance, a recent study in China found a 28.4% mortality for P. aeruginosa infections [27]. Some of the known mortality risk factors include cardiovascular disease, MDR phenotype, mechanical ventilation, central venous catheter, septic shock, delayed appropriate therapy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neutropenia, and hypoalbuminemia [27–31]. The most important predictor of mortality in our study was hemodialysis, which was associated with 31-fold increased odds of death among patients with P. aeruginosa infections. The cause of this increased mortality is multifactorial. The pharmacokinetics of antimicrobials in patients receiving hemodialysis requires special consideration and dosage adjustments, and therefore, therapeutic concentrations might not be achieved in hemodialysis patients [32, 33]. In addition, immune system dysregulation and impaired innate immunity are observed in dialysis patients, which could jeopardize their immune response to an infection [34, 35]. Another risk factor in our study was malignancy, with a 10-fold increase in odds of death, which can be explained by a longer hospital stay, immunosuppression, and anti-neoplastic chemotherapy [36]. In addition to that, isolation of P. aeruginosa from a respiratory source was associated with mortality, which is consistent with the high mortality rates associated with hospital-acquired pneumonias and ventilator-associated pneumonias caused by the organism [3, 4]. The ability of P. aeruginosa to induce cell death is critical. Massive lung epithelial cell death due to multiple apoptosis pathways is the hallmark of severe lung injury caused by P. aeruginosa [37]. The final independent predictor of mortality was the recent use of steroids, which has a well-established association with a higher risk of bacteremia and mortality [38]. This can be explained by the ability of corticosteroids to suppress phagocytosis, cytokine release, and leukocyte adhesion [39].

In this study, we were interested in developing a mortality risk score that includes baseline variables that would allow the early identification of patients at high risk of death. This risk-stratification process could then be used to guide the management of such patients. The score presented in this study combines the independent risk factors and presents them in a quantitative form to be used with ease in the clinical setting.

This study has several limitations. We recruited each patient only once, and we did not collect data regarding the development of subsequent infection with a resistant pathogen. Therefore, we could not study the effect of monotherapy versus combination therapy on the development of resistance. Even though the individual patient mortality risk score provides a useful tool to stratify patients based on risk, it needs to be validated in larger cohorts before being used in a clinical setting.

Conclusions

Understanding risk factors associated with P. aeruginosa resistance and complications is crucial to decreasing the emerging threat of the organism. Selecting the most suitable empiric treatment based on local resistance patterns as well as individual mortality risk estimations would enable physicians to treat such infections promptly and effectively, to decrease the burden of the disease.

Citation: Frem JA, Doumat G, Kazma J, Gharamti A, Kanj SS, Abou Fayad AG, et al. (2023) Clinical predictors of mortality in patients with pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. PLoS ONE 18(4): e0282276. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282276

About the Authors:

Jim Abi Frem

Contributed equally to this work with: Jim Abi Frem, George Doumat

Roles: Data curation, Resources, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

George Doumat

Contributed equally to this work with: Jim Abi Frem, George Doumat

Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Resources, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3931-2709

Jamil Kazma

Roles: Data curation, Formal analysis, Resources

Affiliation: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America

Amal Gharamti

Roles: Data curation

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

Souha S. Kanj

Roles: Methodology, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

Antoine G. Abou Fayad

Roles: Investigation, Methodology

Affiliations: Department of Experimental Pathology, Immunology, and Microbiology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon, WHO Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Bacterial Pathogens, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

Ghassan M. Matar

Roles: Methodology, Visualization

Affiliations: Department of Experimental Pathology, Immunology, and Microbiology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon, WHO Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Bacterial Pathogens, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

Zeina A. Kanafani

Roles: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8814-1286

References

1. Athanasiou CI, Kopsini A. Systematic review of the use of time series data in the study of antimicrobial consumption and Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018;15:69–73. pmid:29906626

2. Rosenthal VD, Maki DG, Mehta Y, Leblebicioglu H, Memish ZA, Al-Mousa HH, et al. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report, data summary of 43 countries for 2007–2012. Device-associated module. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(9):942–56.

3. Folic MM, Djordjevic Z, Folic N, Radojevic MZ, Jankovic SM. Epidemiology and risk factors for healthcare-associated infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Chemother. 2021;33(5):294–301. pmid:32996875

4. Maraolo AE, Cascella M, Corcione S, Cuomo A, Nappa S, Borgia G, et al. Management of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the intensive care unit: state of the art. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2017;15(9):861–71. pmid:28803496

5. Kanafani ZA, El Zakhem A, Zahreddine N, Ahmadieh R, Kanj SS. Ten-year surveillance study of ventilator-associated pneumonia at a tertiary care center in Lebanon. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2019;12(4):492–5. pmid:30737129

6. Gupta R, Malik A, Rizvi M, Ahmed SM. Incidence of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas Spp. in ICU Patients with Special Reference to ESBL, AMPC, MBL and Biofilm Production. J Glob Infect Dis. 2016;8(1):25–31. pmid:27013841

7. Dantas RC, Ferreira ML, Gontijo-Filho PP, Ribas RM. Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: independent risk factors for mortality and impact of resistance on outcome. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63(Pt 12):1679–87. pmid:25261066

8. Moussally M, Zahreddine N, Kazma J, Ahmadieh R, Kanj SS, Kanafani ZA. Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant organisms among hospitalized patients at a tertiary care center in Lebanon, 2010–2018. J Infect Public Health. 2021;14(1):12–6. pmid:33341479

9. Moghnieh RA, Kanafani ZA, Tabaja HZ, Sharara SL, Awad LS, Kanj SS. Epidemiology of common resistant bacterial pathogens in the countries of the Arab League. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(12):e379–e94. pmid:30292478

10. Recio R, Mancheno M, Viedma E, Villa J, Orellana MA, Lora-Tamayo J, et al. Predictors of Mortality in Bloodstream Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Impact of Antimicrobial Resistance and Bacterial Virulence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(2):e01759–19. pmid:31767719

11. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(3):268–81. pmid:21793988

12. Kadri SS, Adjemian J, Lai YL, Spaulding AB, Ricotta E, Prevots DR, et al. Difficult-to-Treat Resistance in Gram-negative Bacteremia at 173 US Hospitals: Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcome of Resistance to All First-line Agents. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67(12):1803–14. pmid:30052813

13. Le Gall J-R. A New Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) Based on a European/North American Multicenter Study. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1993;270(24). pmid:8254858

14. Lila G, Mulliqi-Osmani G, Bajrami R, Kurti A, Azizi E, Raka L. The prevalence and resistance patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a tertiary care hospital in Kosovo. Infez Med. 2017;25(1):21–6. pmid:28353451

15. Ruiz-Garbajosa P, Canton R. Epidemiology of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Implications for empiric and definitive therapy. Rev Esp Quimioter. 2017;30 Suppl 1:8–12.

16. Del Barrio-Tofino E, Zamorano L, Cortes-Lara S, Lopez-Causape C, Sanchez-Diener I, Cabot G, et al. Spanish nationwide survey on Pseudomonas aeruginosa antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and epidemiology. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(7):1825–35. pmid:30989186

17. Slekovec C, Robert J, van der Mee-Marquet N, Berthelot P, Rogues AM, Derouin V, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from infected ICU patients: a French multicenter 2012–2013 study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38(5):921–6. pmid:30826996

18. Saeed NK, Kambal AM, El-Khizzi NA. Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in a general intensive care unit in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2010;31(12):1341–9. pmid:21135998

19. Farhan SM, Ibrahim RA, Mahran KM, Hetta HF, Abd El-Baky RM. Antimicrobial resistance pattern and molecular genetic distribution of metallo-beta-lactamases producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from hospitals in Minia, Egypt. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:2125–33.

20. Bhat S, Fujitani S, Potoski BA, Capitano B, Linden PK, Shutt K, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the Intensive Care Unit: can the adequacy of empirical beta-lactam antibiotic therapy be improved? Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;30(5):458–62. pmid:17703923

21. Xu J, Duan X, Wu H, Zhou Q. Surveillance and correlation of antimicrobial usage and resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a hospital population-based study. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e78604. pmid:24250801

22. Mladenovic-Antic S, Kocic B, Velickovic-Radovanovic R, Dinic M, Petrovic J, Randjelovic G, et al. Correlation between antimicrobial consumption and antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a hospital setting: a 10-year study. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics. 2016;41(5):532–7. pmid:27511808

23. Djordjevic ZM, Folic MM, Jankovic SM. Correlation between cefepime utilisation and Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance rates to beta-lactams and carbapenems in patients with healthcare-associated infections. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance. 2018;13:60–4.

24. Traugott KA, Echevarria K, Maxwell P, Green K, Lewis JS, 2nd. Monotherapy or combination therapy? The Pseudomonas aeruginosa conundrum. Pharmacotherapy. 2011;31(6):598–608. pmid:21923444

25. Montero MM, Lopez Montesinos I, Knobel H, Molas E, Sorli L, Siverio-Pares A, et al. Risk Factors for Mortality among Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections: What Is the Influence of XDR Phenotype on Outcomes? J Clin Med. 2020;9(2). pmid:32074947

26. Jones F, Hu Y, Coates A. The Efficacy of Using Combination Therapy against Multi-Drug and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Clinical Settings. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022;11(3):323. pmid:35326786

27. Zhang Y, Li Y, Zeng J, Chang Y, Han S, Zhao J, et al. Risk Factors for Mortality of Inpatients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in China: Impact of Resistance Profile in the Mortality. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:4115–23. pmid:33209041

28. Kim YJ, Jun YH, Kim YR, Park KG, Park YJ, Kang JY, et al. Risk factors for mortality in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia; retrospective study of impact of combination antimicrobial therapy. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:161. pmid:24655422

29. Lodise TP Jr, Patel N, Kwa , Graves J, Furuno JP, Graffunder E, et al. Predictors of 30-day mortality among patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections: impact of delayed appropriate antibiotic selection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(10):3510–5. pmid:17646415

30. Pinheiro MR, Lacerda HR, Melo RG, Maciel MA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: factors relating to mortality with emphasis on resistance pattern and antimicrobial treatment. Braz J Infect Dis. 2008;12(6):509–15. pmid:19287840

31. Tumbarello M, Repetto E, Trecarichi EM, Bernardini C, De Pascale G, Parisini A, et al. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections: risk factors and mortality. Epidemiol Infect. 2011;139(11):1740–9. pmid:21226988

32. Thalhammer F, Horl WH. Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in patients with renal failure and patients receiving renal replacement therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000;39(4):271–9. pmid:11069213

33. Pistolesi V, Morabito S, Di Mario F, Regolisti G, Cantarelli C, Fiaccadori E. A Guide to Understanding Antimicrobial Drug Dosing in Critically Ill Patients on Renal Replacement Therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(8):e00583–19. pmid:31109983

34. Pappas EM, Mpournaka S, Katopodis P, Chardalias A, Tsakas S, Theodoros T, et al. The Effect of Dialysis Modality and Membrane Performance on Native Immunity in Dialysis Patients. Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2019;40(2):25–32. pmid:31605588

35. Losappio V, Franzin R, Infante B, Godeas G, Gesualdo L, Fersini A, et al. Molecular Mechanisms of Premature Aging in Hemodialysis: The Complex Interplay between Innate and Adaptive Immune Dysfunction. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(10). pmid:32408613

36. Krcmery V, Koprnova J, Gogova M, Grey E, Korcova J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia in cancer patients. J Infect. 2006;52(6):461–3. pmid:16621000

37. Deshpande R, Zou C. Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Induced Cell Death in Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(15):5356. pmid:32731491

38. Chiang HY, Chen TC, Lin CC, Ho LC, Kuo CC, Chi CY. Trend and Predictors of Short-term Mortality of Adult Bacteremia at Emergency Departments: A 14-Year Cohort Study of 14 625 Patients. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021;8(11):ofab485. pmid:34805430

39. Coutinho AE, Chapman KE. The anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids, recent developments and mechanistic insights. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011;335(1):2–13. pmid:20398732