It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Whether the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) during the interpretation of chest radiographs (CXRs) would affect the radiologists’ workload is of particular interest. Therefore, this prospective observational study aimed to observe how AI affected the reading times of radiologists in the daily interpretation of CXRs. Radiologists who agreed to have the reading times of their CXR interpretations collected from September to December 2021 were recruited. Reading time was defined as the duration in seconds from opening CXRs to transcribing the image by the same radiologist. As commercial AI software was integrated for all CXRs, the radiologists could refer to AI results for 2 months (AI-aided period). During the other 2 months, the radiologists were automatically blinded to the AI results (AI-unaided period). A total of 11 radiologists participated, and 18,680 CXRs were included. Total reading times were significantly shortened with AI use, compared to no use (13.3 s vs. 14.8 s, p < 0.001). When there was no abnormality detected by AI, reading times were shorter with AI use (mean 10.8 s vs. 13.1 s, p < 0.001). However, if any abnormality was detected by AI, reading times did not differ according to AI use (mean 18.6 s vs. 18.4 s, p = 0.452). Reading times increased as abnormality scores increased, and a more significant increase was observed with AI use (coefficient 0.09 vs. 0.06, p < 0.001). Therefore, the reading times of CXRs among radiologists were influenced by the availability of AI. Overall reading times shortened when radiologists referred to AI; however, abnormalities detected by AI could lengthen reading times.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Yonsei University College of Medicine, 363, Dongbaekjukjeon-daero, Giheung-gu, Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin-si, South Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454); Yonsei University College of Medicine, 363, Dongbaekjukjeon-daero, Giheung-gu, Center for Digital Health, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin-si, South Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454)
2 Yonsei University College of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Seodaemun-Gu, South Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454)
3 Yonsei University Graduate School, Department of Biostatistics and Computing, Seodaemun-Gu, South Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454)