It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Invasive species pose a major threat to biodiversity and inflict massive economic costs. Effective management of bio-invasions depends on reliable predictions of areas at risk of invasion, as they allow early invader detection and rapid responses. Yet, considerable uncertainty remains as to how to predict best potential invasive distribution ranges. Using a set of mainly (sub)tropical birds introduced to Europe, we show that the true extent of the geographical area at risk of invasion can accurately be determined by using ecophysiological mechanistic models that quantify species’ fundamental thermal niches. Potential invasive ranges are primarily constrained by functional traits related to body allometry and body temperature, metabolic rates, and feather insulation. Given their capacity to identify tolerable climates outside of contemporary realized species niches, mechanistic predictions are well suited for informing effective policy and management aimed at preventing the escalating impacts of invasive species.
Forecasts of risks of invasion by non-native species are challenging to obtain. Here, the authors show that mechanistic models based on functional traits related to species’ capacity to generate and retain body heat identify areas at risk of invasion by non-native birds in Europe.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Ghent University, Terrestrial Ecology Unit (TEREC), Department of Biology, Gent, Belgium (GRID:grid.5342.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2069 7798); University of Copenhagen, Center for Macroecology, Evolution, and Climate (CMEC), GLOBE Institute, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark (GRID:grid.5254.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0674 042X)
2 University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, School of Life Sciences, Honolulu, USA (GRID:grid.410445.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 0957); Universidad de Chile, Centro de Modelamiento Matemático (CNRS IRL2807), Santiago, Chile (GRID:grid.443909.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0385 4466)
3 Alameda do Monte da Virgem, CICGE—Centro de Investigação em Ciências Geo-Espaciais, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal (GRID:grid.443909.3)
4 Ghent University, Terrestrial Ecology Unit (TEREC), Department of Biology, Gent, Belgium (GRID:grid.5342.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2069 7798); University of Konstanz, Ecology, Department of Biology, Konstanz, Germany (GRID:grid.9811.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0658 7699)
5 Ghent University, Terrestrial Ecology Unit (TEREC), Department of Biology, Gent, Belgium (GRID:grid.5342.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2069 7798)
6 University of Copenhagen, Center for Macroecology, Evolution, and Climate (CMEC), GLOBE Institute, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark (GRID:grid.5254.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0674 042X)