It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Stress increases plasma concentrations of corticosteroids, however, their tissue levels are unclear. Using a repeated social defeat paradigm, we examined the impact of chronic stress on tissue levels of corticosterone (CORT), progesterone (PROG), 11-deoxycorticosterone (11DOC) and 11-dehydrocorticosterone (11DHC) and on gut microbiota, which may reshape the stress response. Male BALB/c mice, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and 16S RNA gene sequencing were used to screen steroid levels and fecal microbiome, respectively. Stress induced greater increase of CORT in the brain, liver, and kidney than in the colon and lymphoid organs, whereas 11DHC was the highest in the colon, liver and kidney and much lower in the brain and lymphoid organs. The CORT/11DHC ratio in plasma was similar to the brain but much lower in other organs. Stress also altered tissue levels of PROG and 11DOC and the PROG/11DOC ratio was much higher in lymphoid organs that in plasma and other organs. Stress impacted the β- but not the α-diversity of the gut microbiota and LEfSe analysis revealed several biomarkers associated with stress treatment. Our data indicate that social defeat stress modulates gut microbiota diversity and induces tissue-dependent changes in local levels of corticosteroids, which often do not reflect their systemic levels.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physiology, Prague 4—Krč, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.418095.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 3316)
2 Crop Research Institute, Quality and Plant Products, Prague, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.417626.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2187 627X)
3 Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Prague, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.418095.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 3316)
4 Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Prague, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.418095.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 3316); Czech University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Prague, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.15866.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2238 631X)
5 Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physiology, Prague 4—Krč, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.418095.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 3316); Charles University, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Science, Prague, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.4491.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 116X)