It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Since Purcell’s seminal report 75 years ago, electromagnetic resonators have been used to control light-matter interactions to make brighter radiation sources and unleash unprecedented control over quantum states of light and matter. Indeed, optical resonators such as microcavities and plasmonic antennas offer excellent control but only over a limited spectral range. Strategies to mutually tune and match emission and resonator frequency are often required, which is intricate and precludes the possibility of enhancing multiple transitions simultaneously. In this letter, we report a strong radiative emission rate enhancement of Er3+-ions across the telecommunications C-band in a single plasmonic waveguide based on the Purcell effect. Our gap waveguide uses a reverse nanofocusing approach to efficiently enhance, extract and guide emission from the nanoscale to a photonic waveguide while keeping plasmonic losses at a minimum. Remarkably, the large and broadband Purcell enhancement allows us to resolve Stark-split electric dipole transitions, which are typically only observed under cryogenic conditions. Simultaneous radiative emission enhancement of multiple quantum states is of great interest for photonic quantum networks and on-chip data communications.
Emission enhancement and extraction from quantum emitters is a major challenge for photon sources in e.g. quantum photonic networks. Here the authors propose a broadband waveguide platform which allows to boost, extract, and guide quantum emission within integrated photonic networks.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Imperial College London, Department of Physics, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111); Stanford University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956)
2 Imperial College London, Department of Physics, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111)
3 Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany (GRID:grid.9613.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 1939 2794)
4 Imperial College London, Department of Physics, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111); UNSW Sydney, School of Photovoltaics and Renewable Energy Engineering, Kensington, Australia (GRID:grid.1005.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4902 0432)
5 Imperial College London, Department of Physics, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111); University of Bristol, Quantum Engineering Technology Labs, Bristol, UK (GRID:grid.5337.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7603)
6 Imperial College London, Department of Physics, London, UK (GRID:grid.7445.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2113 8111); Monash University School of Physics and Astronomy, Clayton, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857)