Abstract
The trace metal iron (Fe) controls the diversity and activity of phytoplankton across the surface oceans, a paradigm established through decades of in situ and mesocosm experimental studies. Despite widespread Fe-limitation within high-nutrient, low chlorophyll (HNLC) waters, significant contributions of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus to the phytoplankton stock can be found. Correlations among differing strains of Synechococcus across different Fe-regimes have suggested the existence of Fe-adapted ecotypes. However, experimental evidence of high- versus low-Fe adapted strains of Synechococcus is lacking, and so we investigated the transcriptional responses of microbial communities inhabiting the HNLC, sub-Antarctic region of the Southern Ocean during the Spring of 2018. Analysis of metatranscriptomes generated from on-deck incubation experiments reflecting a gradient of Fe-availabilities reveal transcriptomic signatures indicative of co-occurring Synechococcus ecotypes adapted to differing Fe-regimes. Functional analyses comparing low-Fe and high-Fe conditions point to various Fe-acquisition mechanisms that may allow persistence of low-Fe adapted Synechococcus under Fe-limitation. Comparison of in situ surface conditions to the Fe-titrations indicate ecological relevance of these mechanisms as well as persistence of both putative ecotypes within this region. This Fe-titration approach, combined with transcriptomics, highlights the short-term responses of the in situ phytoplankton community to Fe-availability that are often overlooked by examining genomic content or bulk physiological responses alone. These findings expand our knowledge about how phytoplankton in HNLC Southern Ocean waters adapt and respond to changing Fe supply.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; LeCleir, Gary R. 1 ; Strzepek, Robert F. 2
; Ellwood, Michael J. 3 ; Twining, Benjamin S. 4
; Roux, S. 5 ; Pennacchio, C. 5
; Boyd, Philip W. 6 ; Wilhelm, Steven W. 1
1 The University of Tennessee, Department of Microbiology, Knoxville, USA (GRID:grid.411461.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2315 1184)
2 Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X); Australian Antarctic Program Partnership (AAPP), Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X)
3 Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia (GRID:grid.1001.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2180 7477)
4 Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, East Boothbay, USA (GRID:grid.296275.d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9516 4913)
5 DOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.451309.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0449 479X)
6 Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia (GRID:grid.1009.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 826X)





