It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Herbicide resistance represents one of the biggest threats to our natural environment and agricultural sector. Thus, new herbicides are urgently needed to tackle the rise in herbicide-resistant weeds. Here, we employed a novel strategy to repurpose a ‘failed’ antibiotic into a new and target-specific herbicidal compound. Specifically, we identified an inhibitor of bacterial dihydrodipicolinate reductase (DHDPR), an enzyme involved in lysine biosynthesis in plants and bacteria, that exhibited no antibacterial activity but severely attenuated germination of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. We confirmed that the inhibitor targets plant DHDPR orthologues in vitro, and exhibits no toxic effects against human cell lines. A series of analogues were then synthesised with improved efficacy in germination assays and against soil-grown A. thaliana. We also showed that our lead compound is the first lysine biosynthesis inhibitor with activity against both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous weed species, by demonstrating its effectiveness at reducing the germination and growth of Lolium rigidum (rigid ryegrass) and Raphanus raphanistrum (wild radish). These results provide proof-of-concept that DHDPR inhibition may represent a much-needed new herbicide mode of action. Furthermore, this study exemplifies the untapped potential of repurposing ‘failed’ antibiotic scaffolds to fast-track the development of herbicide candidates targeting the respective plant enzymes.
A repurposed ‘failed’ antibiotic, an inhibitor against bacterial dihydrodipicolinate reductase, exhibits effective herbicidal action against both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous weed species.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research Institute, Urrbrae, Australia (GRID:grid.1010.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7304); La Trobe University, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, Bundoora, Australia (GRID:grid.1018.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2342 0938)
2 La Trobe University, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, Bundoora, Australia (GRID:grid.1018.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2342 0938)
3 La Trobe University, Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Research Hub for Medicinal Agriculture, AgriBio, Bundoora, Australia (GRID:grid.1018.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2342 0938); La Trobe University, Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, Bundoora, Australia (GRID:grid.1018.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2342 0938)
4 Australian Synchrotron, ANSTO, Clayton, Australia (GRID:grid.248753.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0562 0567); Monash University, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857)