It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The most widely used method for intracellular RNA fluorescence labeling is MS2 labeling, which generally relies on the use of multiple protein labels targeted to multiple RNA (MS2) hairpin structures installed on the RNA of interest (ROI). While effective and conveniently applied in cell biology labs, the protein labels add significant mass to the bound RNA, which potentially impacts steric accessibility and native RNA biology. We have previously demonstrated that internal, genetically encoded, uridine-rich internal loops (URILs) comprised of four contiguous UU pairs (8 nt) in RNA may be targeted with minimal structural perturbation by triplex hybridization with 1 kD bifacial peptide nucleic acids (bPNAs). A URIL-targeting strategy for RNA and DNA tracking would avoid the use of cumbersome protein fusion labels and minimize structural alterations to the RNA of interest. Here we show that URIL-targeting fluorogenic bPNA probes in cell media can penetrate cell membranes and effectively label RNAs and RNPs in fixed and live cells. This method, which we call fluorogenic U-rich internal loop (FLURIL) tagging, was internally validated through the use of RNAs bearing both URIL and MS2 labeling sites. Notably, a direct comparison of CRISPR-dCas labeled genomic loci in live U2OS cells revealed that FLURIL-tagged gRNA yielded loci with signal to background up to 7X greater than loci targeted by guide RNA modified with an array of eight MS2 hairpins. Together, these data show that FLURIL tagging provides a versatile scope of intracellular RNA and DNA tracking while maintaining a light molecular footprint and compatibility with existing methods.
Commonly used protein-based tools to monitor intracellular RNA and DNA can impact steric accessibility and native nucleic acid biology. Here, the authors show that fluorogenic uridine-rich internal loop tagging bPNA probes can be used to label nucleic acids in fixed and live cells.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 The Ohio State University, Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Columbus, USA (GRID:grid.261331.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2285 7943); The Ohio State University, Center for RNA Biology, Columbus, USA (GRID:grid.261331.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2285 7943)
2 The Ohio State University, Center for RNA Biology, Columbus, USA (GRID:grid.261331.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2285 7943); The Ohio State University, Department of Biological Chemistry and Pharmacology, Columbus, USA (GRID:grid.261331.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2285 7943); The Ohio State University, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, USA (GRID:grid.261331.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2285 7943)
3 The Ohio State University, Department of Biological Chemistry and Pharmacology, Columbus, USA (GRID:grid.261331.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2285 7943)