1. Introduction
There is mounting evidence of brain-related pathology due to COVID-19, both during the acute phase of the disease and in the longer-term course [1]. In addition to the well-documented loss of taste and smell during the acute phase [2], individuals affected by the virus may also suffer long-term neurological, psychiatric, and neurocognitive impairments following COVID-19 infection, particularly cognitive deficits such as impaired concentration and memory, even after asymptomatic infection [3]. Persistent neurological complications have been reported in up to 25% of patients [4], although studies have demonstrated high variability in the prevalence and incidence of symptoms [5]. Given that acquired neural damage can increase the risk of initiating or exacerbating neurodegenerative processes [6], greater attention is now being paid to the long-term impact of COVID-19 on the central nervous system (CNS).
It has been postulated that patients severely ill with COVID-19 may also experience more severe CNS damage [7]. However, several case series have shown that neurological symptoms are not limited to severe cases. In fact, between 37% to 84% of patients with mild symptoms in intermediate care exhibit neurological impairment [7,8]. This implies that the severity of the initial infection may play a prominent role in long-term neurological trajectories. While most COVID-19 imaging studies to date have focused on acute and hospitalised cases with a fairly broad spectrum of gross cerebral abnormalities, such as white matter hyperintensities and cerebrovascular events, especially in the cerebrum [9], there have been fewer cohort studies that quantitatively compare volumetric brain data among subjects with different disease severity. As such, it remains unclear whether the effects of COVID-19 on the CNS can be quantitatively assessed even in milder cases, or whether they depend on the initial severity of the disease. Knowledge of such effects might reveal possible mechanisms for the spread and potential sequelae of the disease. To assess the potential impact of COVID-19 on the brain and its structural integrity, this magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study was conducted to evaluate potential volumetric brain abnormalities among patients with asymptomatic/mild and severe cases of COVID-19 after remission of infection, in comparison to actively recruited healthy controls, using artificial intelligence (AI)-based volumetry. Utilising a volumetric approach may provide insights into possible cortical and subcortical alterations after COVID-19.
2. Materials and Methods
This monocentric longitudinal prospective cohort study was conducted at Bonn University Hospital and is one of three subprojects within a three-pronged research consortium known as “COVIMMUNE: Studies on immune system function and disease progression of COVID-19”, funded by the German Ministry of Health. In addition to clinical and neuropsychological examinations conducted by trained and qualified medical investigators at three timepoints (baseline, 6 and 12 months), standardised brain MR imaging was scheduled at two time points (baseline and after 12 months) for all participant groups. In this paper, we present the baseline MR imaging findings (i.e., after study enrolment) from the radiological project arm. MRI follow-up at 12 months is planned and currently pending, and therefore not yet part of the analysis below. The local Internal Review Board (the Medical Ethics Review Board of the University Hospital Bonn, ID 511/20) reviewed the study protocol, and final approval was obtained on 10 March 2021. All participants provided written informed consent before taking part in any study-specific procedures.
This study has been preregistered at the German Clinical Trials Registry (primary registry trial identifier: DRKS00023806; registration date: 16 March 2021, and cross-referenced with the World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform [ICTRP]).
2.1. Study Population
A total of 172 participants with similar age and sex distribution were prospectively enrolled using frequency matching (as of 10 March 2022), of whom 10 failed screening and 7 were lost during the scheduled MRI examination stage due to claustrophobia (n = 4) or metallic implants (n = 3). The remaining 155 participants were categorized into three groups based on their health status: healthy control subjects (n = 56), patients with an asymptomatic/mild course (n = 51), and patients with a severe course of COVID-19 (n = 48), as explained below.
The entire study protocol was recently described elsewhere [10] and can be summarised as follows regarding the radiological project arm:
General inclusion criteria:
aged 25 to 75 years
Cohort-specific inclusion criteria:
Cohort I: asymptomatic course (MILD) of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2–positive) or mild course (i.e., declaration of no symptoms other than anosmia or ageusia)
Cohort II: severely affected course (SEV) of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2–positive) according to simplified WHO classification, defined as having been admitted to hospital (any ward type) for at least 24 h due to SARS-CoV-2 infection at any timepoint during the course of the disease
Cohort III: healthy controls (CTL) will only be included in the study if they also meet all of the following criteria:
must perform > –1.0 SD on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test
no substance abuse
no known history of or current diagnosed psychiatric illness
negative nCoV IgG/IgM Rapid Test before inclusion, indicative of no recent COVID-19 infection
General exclusion criteria:
general contraindication for MRI
severe or unstable medical condition
current major depressive episode
psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, substance abuse at present or in the past
known neurodegenerative disorder (Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, frontotemporal dementia, Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis)
vascular dementia or history of stroke
history of malignant disease
2.2. Magnetic Resonance Imaging
All participants underwent standardised brain MRI at baseline following enrolment in the study. MR imaging was performed on a clinical whole-body 3 T MRI system (Achieva TX, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) equipped with an 8-channel head coil with identical scanning protocols. Morphological brain imaging included three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted magnetisation-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (3D MPRAGE), 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3D-FLAIR), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and T2-weighted imaging (T2W). Details of the MRI scanning parameters are summarised in Table 1.
2.3. Image Analysis
Board-certified radiologists with several years of neuroradiological experience visually examined the MRI datasets of all subjects for acute cerebral pathology and possible exclusion criteria.
2.4. Post-Processing and Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Volumetry
Automated AI-based software was used to determine quantitative analyses of the volume of different brain areas in mL and age- and sex-adjusted percentiles (based on an internal reference collective of age- and sex-adjusted healthy controls from the general population embedded in the software). This commercially licensed MRI post-processing software, named “mdbrain”, is provided by mediaire GmbH, Berlin, Germany, an approved medical device manufacturer according to the European Medical Device Directive 93/42/EEC, and is certified according to DIN EN ISO 13485:2016. The “mdbrain” software is approved as a CE-marked medical device. It performs automatic brain volumetry of different brain regions using native 3D T1-weighted sequences to allow quantitative statements based on an extensive population-based normative database. The algorithm and embedded normative database are trained nationwide, not limited to the experience of a single centre, and have been validated for accuracy [11].
The 3D T1w MPRAGE sequence was manually transferred from the clinical PACS to the mdbrain software, v4.4.1 or higher, for automatic volumetrization and percentile calculation. The volumes and percentiles of all evaluated structures were automatically computed, saved and checked for plausibility. The volumetrized structures were the whole brain, whole white matter, whole grey matter, cerebral cortex, cerebellar cortex, frontal lobe, parietal lobe, precuneus, occipital lobe, temporal lobe, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, entorhinal cortex, caudate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidum, thalamus, brainstem, mesencephalon, pons, lateral ventricle, third ventricle, and fourth ventricle. Volumes were determined separately for each of the paired structures.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software (v27 and above, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R (v4.2.2, R core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL
3. Results
Table 2 summarised the general demographic and clinical characteristics of the cohort. There were no significant differences between the three sub-cohorts in terms of age, gender distribution, weight, height and BMI. However, on average, the SEV group was older and somewhat heavier than those in the CTL or MILD groups. The time from infection to study inclusion differed from 8.7 ± 4.8 months for ASY to 10.7 ± 5 months for SEV at the time of assessment. Most patients in the SEV group had presented to a normal ward or monitoring unit, whereas 9 out of 48 patients (19%) from the SEV group were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).
Volumetric Brain Analysis
No imaging findings in the visual clinical assessment led to exclusion of subjects according to the aforementioned exclusion criteria. The volumetry software successfully processed all MR imaging studies, and the measurement results of brain area and ventricle volumes in mL and the corresponding percentiles for the three participant groups CTL, MILD and SEV are shown in Table 3 and Table 4. The mean measured brain volumes of the CTL and MILD groups differed greatly from those of the SEV group. However, the mean measured volumes of the MILD group were of a similar magnitude or slightly higher than those of the CTL group. Exemplary MRI volumetry results are shown in Figure 1.
Comparing all COVID-19 recovered patients (MILD + SEV) with healthy controls, statistically significant smaller volumes in COVID-19 recovered patients were identified for the brainstem volume (74.22 mL vs. 84.68 mL, p = 0.046). Smaller percentiles were detected in the supratentorial grey matter (p = 0.042), frontal lobe right (p = 0.013) and the parietal lobe right (p = 0.03) and left (p = 0.023).
One-way ANOVA analyses across the three groups (CTL, MILD, SEV) revealed statistically significant differences in several brain volumes (see also Supplementary Table S1): whole brain, whole brain grey matter, supratentorial grey matter, frontal lobe right and left, parietal lobe right and left, precuneus right and left, occipital lobe left, temporal lobe right and left, caudate nucleus right and left, putamen right and left, pallidum right and left, thalamus right and left and cerebellar grey matter. Statistically significant differences in brain percentiles were detected in whole brain grey matter, frontal lobe right, caudate nucleus right and left and thalamus right and left.
Post hoc pairwise analyses showed statistically significant differences with increasing volume decline with disease severity (SEV > MILD > CTL) in the following brain areas, as additionally outlined in Supplementary Table S1: whole brain grey matter, supratentorial grey matter, both frontal lobes, both parietal lobes and thalamus right. Further statistically significant pairwise differences in brain volume were found between SEV and MILD, but not between SEV and CTL, in the following areas: whole brain, precuneus right and left, both temporal lobes, parahippocampal gyrus left, both caudate nuclei, putamen right and left, pallidum right and left, and cerebellar grey matter. Arithmetic differences in these brain volumes were also found between the SEV and CTL groups. The SEV group generally had smaller brain subvolumes than the CTL group, but this was not statistically significant in these areas. Regarding brain percentiles, statistically significant differences were detected between the SEV and CTL group in the whole brain, whole brain grey matter, frontal lobe right, caudate nucleus left and thalamus left. Statistically significant differences were observed in brain area percentiles between the SEV and MILD groups in the whole brain white matter, caudate nucleus left and third ventricle.
After excluding the ICU-treated patients (n = 9) from the data analysis, additional pairwise post hoc comparison between the three groups revealed statistically significant decreases in brain volumes that corresponded with increasing severity of disease (SEV > MILD > CTL). This is summarised in Supplementary Table S2, showing the whole brain grey matter, supratentorial grey matter, frontal lobe right, both parietal lobes and thalamus right.
In addition to established determinants of brain volume such as age and sex, the BMI, height and COVID-19 severity (MILD and SEV) were co-analysed as variables in a multivariate model, yielding statistically significant effects of COVID-19 on brain volume decline in the following areas (Table 5; a complete list of results are shown in Supplementary Table S3): whole brain grey matter, supratentorial grey matter, both frontal lobes, both parietal lobes, precuneus right, occipital lobe left, thalamus right and brainstem. The estimated impact of the respective variables on the selected brain volumes is graphically illustrated in Figure 2. Regarding brain percentiles, a statistically significant contribution of severe COVID-19 to the whole brain volume could be detected.
4. Discussion
This MR imaging study evaluated the potential impact of COVID-19 on brain volume in patients after recovery from asymptomatic/mild and severe SARS-CoV-2 infection using automated AI-based volumetry. To date, this study includes the largest number of severely affected COVID-19 patients compared to previously published imaging studies, to the best of our knowledge. Our volumetric analyses revealed small but statistically significant differences in measured brain volumes according to COVID-19 severity. These atrophy patterns primarily affected the total and supratentorial grey matter, both frontal and parietal lobes, and the right thalamus. These findings were further supported by reduced percentiles normalised across the general population in the corresponding brain areas. Notably, the observed group differences were significant even after excluding 9 ICU-treated patients (except for the left frontal lobe). This implies that the potential influence of relaxation, mechanical ventilation or intensified drug therapy on the overall outcome appears largely negligible [12,13]. Moreover, multivariate modelling showed that the severity of COVID-19 had a modest yet statistically significant impact on the measured brain volumes, along with established demographic factors such as age and sex, even after adjustment for ICU admission. Our data, therefore, highlight possible neocortical damage as a sequelae of COVID-19 that could be related to initial disease severity. However, these results likely reflect a cross-sectional effect on COVID-19 recovered individuals, and may not be generalisable, as not all participants exhibited brain changes in the post hoc setting examined here; this is also unlikely to be the case in our upcoming longitudinal studies. Therefore, future studies need to specify the underlying pathologic conditions that may cause severe brain involvement. Our findings may nevertheless be of significant rehabilitative and socioeconomic importance, given the association of brain atrophy with neurodegenerative diseases.
Previous imaging studies have mainly focused on gross CNS abnormalities in acute and hospitalised COVID-19 patients that could only be interpreted by visual assessment [9]. However, most of these studies showed no specific imaging findings or typical spatial distribution in most patients, except for some case series with clusters of white matter lesions or microbleeds within the middle and posterior cerebral artery territory and basal ganglia [14]. Therefore, it is conceivable that COVID-19 mainly causes microstructural damage, as suggested by the fact that macroscopic changes were much less common than microscopic changes in neuropathological case reports [14]. In contrast, our study relied on a fully automated, quantitative, and objective assessment of spatial clusters of brain volume abnormalities. This approach detected visually inconspicuous findings and potentially demonstrated the impact of COVID-19 on brain integrity, unlike most previous imaging studies. To date, only one prospective longitudinal imaging study by Douaud et al. has examined 401 subjects with a mainly mild course, both before and after SARS-CoV-2 infection, and compared them to matched controls using quantitative imaging biomarkers [15]. In a hypothesis-driven and exploratory approach, atrophy patterns were identified in the olfactory and gustatory cortical systems, with longitudinal reductions in grey matter thickness in the left parahippocampal gyrus, left superior (dorsal) insula, and left lateral orbitofrontal cortex, and marked widespread differences in fronto-parietal areas, particularly in the left hemisphere. Although pronounced atrophy was restricted to a few limbic areas, an increase in cerebrospinal fluid volume and a decrease in total brain volume indicated additional diffuse grey matter loss superimposed on the more regional effects observed in olfactory areas. Even though our automated volume measurements were performed on partially larger brain substructures and thus incorporated averaging effects, the results obtained by Douaud et al. are consistent with the atrophy pattern of the fronto-parietal brain observed in our study, and the volume decrease in the temporal lobes, including the gyri hippocampales, accentuated in severely affected patients. Therefore, we can confirm and extend those previous findings given our relatively large number of severely affected patients (n = 48); in severe cases, there may be increased brain damage in the form of atrophy of the whole-brain grey matter. This pattern of grey matter loss is also consistent with findings from two recent 18F-FDG-PET studies, which reported a decrease in glucose uptake in the bilateral fronto-parietal regions of hospitalised patients during the subacute stage of COVID-19 [16]. Additionally, bilateral hypometabolism in the orbital gyrus rectus and right medial temporal lobe was observed in patients who had recovered from COVID-19 [17]. A recent post hoc CT-based volumetric study found no significant differences between acutely hospitalised COVID-19 patients and control subjects, but did identify reduced grey matter volume in the frontal regions [18]. Similarly, a post-infection MR imaging study of 51 previously hospitalised COVID-19 patients revealed subtle abnormalities in terms of prolonged thalamic T2* relaxation times compared with matched controls, especially in the right thalamus, and more commonly in those with milder courses [19]. While we also observed thalamic atrophy in mild and severe COVID-19 courses, especially in the right thalamus, interpretation of the possible correlations of atrophy and T2* signal would be rather speculative. However, it is important to note that changes in microvascularity can alter T2* signalling, and microvascular injury and resulting inflammation may have altered T2* in the thalamus. A dysregulated inflammatory response in COVID-19 patients may be related to subsequent atrophy in the dependent volume [20]. Another recent study of 33 hospitalized COVID-19 cases with neurological impairment [21] also found lower cortical volume in the orbitofrontal, frontal, and cingulate areas in COVID-19 patients compared with healthy subjects, similar to our observations. At the beginning of the pandemic, MRI studies of ICU patients revealed signal abnormalities in the grey matter, particularly the hippocampus, frontal lobe, and insula [22], which align with our findings of lower grey matter volume, particularly in the orbitofrontal cortex, compared to controls. This is not surprising, given that this cortical area serves as a secondary olfactory cortex and may provide a potential direct pathway for SARS-CoV-2 to invade the CNS [23].
Many COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalisation present with mild to moderate neurocognitive deficits [24]. Dedicated neuropsychological testing has shown that hospitalised COVID-19 patients tend to experience the most severe deficits in memory and executive functions. In contrast, their language skills, orientation, general attention, and processing speed are typically mildly affected [10,16]. These specific patterns suggest that general deterioration or fatigue cannot be the plausible cause of these abnormalities. This is particularly evident given that these findings differ from those in post-septic patients, who typically experience impaired attention and processing speed [25,26]. Instead, our findings suggest the involvement of the fronto-parietal cortex, which aligns with the atrophy pattern in the fronto-parietal brain identified in our study by functional neurocognitive results [27]. In particular, the orbitofrontal and cingulate cortex play essential roles in several cognitive functions such as attention, motivation, decision making, and conflict-error monitoring, which are impaired in COVID-19 patients [28,29] and have been altered in our and other recent studies [15,21]. Moreover, some studies suggest that atrophy of the right thalamus, as observed in our study, is associated with cognitive deficits, including impairments in memory and attention [30].
The pathomechanisms of the acute and long-term neurologic damage resulting from COVID-19 remain largely unclear. However, secondary immune-mediated inflammatory complications [31] are discussed as triggers of neurologic and neurocognitive dysfunction in addition to direct viral invasion [32], given the known neurotropism of the coronavirus [33,34]. Functional PET studies have shown that neocortical damage might not result from persistent encephalitis or systemically triggered local inflammation [16,17]. One hypothesis is that SARS-CoV-2 enters the central nervous system via the olfactory mucosa and directly affects neurons [35]. The symptoms of hyposmia and hypogeusia often precede the full onset of the disease [8], and the neurons in the olfactory and gustatory networks show volumetrically pronounced atrophy [15,17,18,19], providing support for this idea. A study of olfactory loss, both congenital and acquired, found a positive correlation between grey matter volume in the orbitofrontal cortex and olfactory function [36]. Another hypothesis is that hypoxic brain injury may be responsible for the observed brain changes [14]. This is consistent with the finding that chronic under-supply of oxygen, as seen in patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, causes a reduction in grey matter in widespread regions such as the frontal cortex, cingulate cortex, and other subcortical regions [37]. However, recent studies have identified structural brain changes in asymptomatic COVID-19 patients, as described in our own and other studies [10,15,19]. This makes a hypoxic aetiology of the observed changes less plausible, despite reports of individual cases of restitution after hypoxic brain damage [38].
Several limitations of this exploratory study must be acknowledged. Cross-sectional comparisons were made between healthy controls and COVID-19 patients who had already recovered. Accordingly, it cannot be determined with certainty whether relevant brain changes in COVID-19 patients existed before SARS-CoV-2 infection. The observed effects could ultimately be related to a pre-existing increased susceptibility of the brain to the effects of COVID-19, or therapeutic procedures. However, a recent large-scale pre-post imaging study supports our findings through the substantial overlap with the longitudinally assessed brain atrophies [15]. Furthermore, because our study was observational and not a controlled interventional study, the causality of the observed brain volume changes, in general, cannot be attributed with certainty to COVID-19. The cohort acquisition took place during the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, which saw the emergence of other viral variants such as Delta and Omicron in addition to the wild-type coronavirus. This raises the question whether the observed brain changes could be an expression of a specific strain of the virus. It is well known that patients admitted to the ICU and survivors of critical illness often exhibit neuropsychological and brain changes, including atrophies particularly of the basal ganglia and hippocampi [12,13,26,39]. Nevertheless, our results indicate that these changes do not merely reflect post-ICU effects, as we observed differences in non-hospitalised patients, and even after excluding ICU-patients. Finally, the use of higher resolution volumetry (i.e., segmentation and measurement of finer brain substructures) could potentially reveal further or even greater differences between subcohorts. However, this was not possible with our CE-marked commercial software solution. The use of an in-house built software solution with refined segmentation would have the major disadvantage of complicating comparisons with respect to multicentre research and clinical follow-up.
5. Conclusions
We identified a consistent spatial pattern of grey matter loss and focal atrophy in COVID-19 recovered patients, particularly in the frontal and parietal lobes and the right thalamus. These structural changes in the brain are broadly consistent with preliminary volumetric observations of grey matter loss, and were more pronounced in patients with greater disease severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of prior ICU treatment. This strongly suggests a causal relationship between COVID-19 and the observed brain changes. Notably, our volumetric results were additionally substantiated by a concomitant decline in percentiles in the corresponding brain areas, setting our study apart from most previous imaging studies. This means that the measured brain volume differences of post-COVID-19 subjects not only exist in absolute numbers compared to our matched control and patient groups, but that the differences also increase with respect to the age- and sex-adjusted general population, with increasing severity of the initial disease. Whether these abnormal changes are due to the spread of the disease or the virus itself, which may result in future vulnerability to neurocognitive deficits or exacerbation of pre-existing neurodegenerative conditions in these patients, remains to be investigated. Our ongoing prospective re-imaging study promises to provide further insight into the cerebral effects of COVID-19, pending completion of the clinical and imaging follow-ups. To this end, our longitudinal investigation will specifically pursue two goals in the near future. Firstly, we aim to correlate the volumetric data with clinical neurologic, pneumonologic, and neuropsychologic findings to verify the potential clinical significance of the observed brain changes. Secondly, pending follow-ups may reveal whether there is a dynamic of brain atrophy over time, which might indicate the triggering of a chronic neurodegenerative process.
Conceptualization, Z.B., C.N.W. and F.C.S.; methodology, Z.B., J.P.L., Y.L.L., C.N.W., D.P. and F.C.S.; software, D.P., N.C.L. and F.C.S.; validation, Z.B., C.N.W., J.P.L. and F.C.S.; formal analysis, Z.B., J.P.L., Y.L.L., C.N.W. and F.C.S.; investigation, Z.B., C.N.W., M.S., L.B., D.P., N.C.L. and F.C.S.; resources, M.T.H., A.R. and F.C.S.; data curation, Z.B., C.N.W., M.S. and F.C.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.B. and F.C.S.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, Z.B., J.P.L., Y.L.L. and F.C.S.; supervision, A.R. and F.C.S.; project administration, C.N.W. and F.C.S.; funding acquisition, C.N.W., M.T.H., A.R. and F.C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This study protocol was reviewed by the Medical Ethics Review Board of the University Hospital Bonn (IRB Number 511/20, approved on 10 March 2021).
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
All relevant scientific data are included in the manuscript or the
We gratefully acknowledge the help and technical expertise of Andrea Reiland and all radiographers at the Neuroradiology department of Bonn University Hospital.
The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the subject matter of the article. The German Ministry of Health had no role in the design and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript, or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Examples of fully automated, artificial intelligence (AI)-based brain volumetry in patients with severe (left) and mild (right) cases of COVID-19, showing various brain volumes, along with the deviations of all volumes from a normative collective. These deviations are reported as either 2 or 4 standard deviations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Graphically illustrated results of multivariate modelling in selected brain areas showing the amount by which the dependent variable (volume in mL of a certain brain area) changes when the independent variable increases by one unit (years for age, cm for height and kg/m2 for BMI, severity MILD or SEV for COVID-19). Unilateral or whole brain structures are labelled purple, whereas areas on the left are red, and those on the right are blue. *= p ≤ 0.05, **= p ≤ 0.01, ***= p ≤ 0.001.
Sequence parameters.
| Sequence | Pulse Type | Orientation | TR (ms) | TE (ms) | Reconstructed Voxel Size (mm) | Matrix (mm) | Slices |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T2w | Turbo spin echo | axial | 13.257 | 90 | 0.94 × 0.94 × 1 | 240 × 174 | 140 |
| SWI | 3D fast field echo | axial | 31 | 0 | 0.6 × 0.6 × 2 | 384 × 316 | 145 |
| DWI | b values (0, 500, 1000 s/mm2) | axial | 2725 | 41 | 1 × 1 × 5 | 128 × 127 | 24 |
| T1w | MPRAGE | sagittal | 7.3 | 3.9 | 1 × 1 × 1 | 256 × 256 | 180 |
| FLAIR | 3D gradient echo | sagittal | 4800 | 275 | 1.12 × 1.12 × 1.12 | 240 × 240 | 321 |
DWI: diffusion-weighted imaging, MPRAGE: magnetisation prepared-rapid gradient echo, SWI: susceptibility-weighted imaging, T1W: T1-weighted, T2W: T2-weighted, TE: echo time, TR: repetition time.
Patient demographics and characteristics.
| Characteristics | Healthy Control Subjects (CTL) | Mild COVID-19 Course (MILD) | Severe COVID-19 Course (SEV) | Total | p-Value a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 56 | 51 | 48 | 155 | |
| Age (years) | 47.0 ± 13.3 | 45.7 ± 12.4 | 50.6 ± 12.0 | 47.7 ± 12.7 | 0.612 |
| Gender (m:f) | 26:25 | 28:28 | 25:23 | 78:76 | 0.775 |
| Height (mm) | 175.0 ± 10.5 | 173.6 ± 10.7 | 172.8 ± 10.0 | 173.8 ± 9.9 | 0.316 |
| Weight (kg) | 79.6 ± 16.2 | 81.8 ± 23.5 | 84.4 ± 20.7 | 81.8 ± 20.2 | 0.315 |
| BMI | 25.9 ± 4.3 | 27.2 ± 9.1 | 27.9 ± 6.1 | 27 ± 6.7 | 0.154 |
a calculated with Kruskal–Wallis test; statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05.
Absolute brain area and ventricle volumes (mL).
| Brain Region | CTL | MILD | SEV | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | ±SD | Mean | ±SD | Mean | ±SD | p-Value a | |
| Whole brain | 1264.18 | 117.28 | 1298.19 | 143.63 | 1210.70 | 113.49 | 0.003 |
| Whole brain white substance | 554.24 | 61.31 | 571.79 | 74.26 | 537.20 | 57.18 | 0.32 |
| Whole brain grey substance | 709.83 | 64.35 | 726.87 | 79.03 | 670.34 | 71.03 | ≤0.001 |
| Supratentorial gross cerebral cortex | 483.68 | 46.01 | 491.17 | 58.25 | 455.79 | 48.26 | 0.002 |
| Frontal right | 91.28 | 9.72 | 92.81 | 11.20 | 85.32 | 9.37 | 0.001 |
| Frontal left | 87.52 | 9.05 | 88.22 | 13.73 | 82.05 | 9.23 | 0.01 |
| Parietal right | 48.09 | 5.12 | 48.53 | 5.87 | 45.10 | 5.40 | 0.004 |
| Parietal left | 50.29 | 5.44 | 50.63 | 6.01 | 46.91 | 5.52 | 0.002 |
| Precuneus right | 11.44 | 1.45 | 11.66 | 1.60 | 10.77 | 1.36 | 0.008 |
| Precuneus left | 11.91 | 2.05 | 12.16 | 1.76 | 11.21 | 1.72 | 0.032 |
| Occipital right | 31.52 | 3.38 | 33.27 | 9.40 | 30.26 | 5.51 | 0.073 |
| Occipital left | 37.83 | 8.09 | 37.79 | 7.32 | 34.61 | 4.67 | 0.031 |
| Temporal right | 71.60 | 7.20 | 73.83 | 9.20 | 68.49 | 7.44 | 0.005 |
| Temporal left | 66.46 | 8.31 | 68.20 | 9.64 | 63.99 | 6.73 | 0.045 |
| Mesiotemporal right | 23.86 | 11.00 | 26.28 | 10.79 | 23.91 | 10.24 | 0.423 |
| Mesiotemporal left | 22.44 | 10.23 | 24.67 | 9.77 | 22.40 | 9.34 | 0.402 |
| Hippocampus right | 5.02 | 5.87 | 4.35 | 0.53 | 4.17 | 0.42 | 0.43 |
| Hippocampus left | 5.54 | 10.69 | 4.87 | 3.79 | 4.12 | 0.58 | 0.569 |
| Gyrus parahippocampalis right | 3.27 | 0.37 | 3.40 | 0.44 | 3.22 | 0.33 | 0.053 |
| Gyrus parahippocampalis left | 3.41 | 0.33 | 3.55 | 0.37 | 3.32 | 0.33 | 0.005 |
| Regio entorhinalis right | 2.51 | 0.31 | 2.60 | 0.32 | 2.47 | 0.24 | 0.097 |
| Regio entorhinalis left | 2.45 | 0.28 | 2.52 | 0.31 | 2.42 | 0.30 | 0.27 |
| Nucleus caudatus right | 3.30 | 0.43 | 3.49 | 0.40 | 3.19 | 0.43 | 0.002 |
| Nucleus caudatus left | 2.93 | 0.38 | 3.15 | 0.35 | 2.84 | 0.40 | ≤0.001 |
| Putamen right | 4.19 | 0.46 | 4.33 | 0.51 | 4.02 | 0.48 | 0.006 |
| Putamen left | 4.31 | 0.47 | 4.45 | 0.55 | 4.11 | 0.46 | 0.004 |
| Pallidum right | 1.43 | 0.17 | 1.47 | 0.15 | 1.38 | 0.14 | 0.014 |
| Pallidum left | 1.38 | 0.15 | 1.44 | 0.16 | 1.34 | 0.15 | 0.005 |
| Thalamus right | 8.13 | 0.76 | 8.35 | 0.81 | 7.66 | 0.77 | ≤0.001 |
| Thalamus left | 8.46 | 0.81 | 8.46 | 1.35 | 7.99 | 0.78 | 0.031 |
| Brainstem | 27.87 | 10.31 | 26.39 | 2.92 | 24.88 | 2.62 | 0.072 |
| Mesencephalon | 8.91 | 12.29 | 7.23 | 0.90 | 6.81 | 0.84 | 0.307 |
| Pons | 15.86 | 11.18 | 14.36 | 1.77 | 13.59 | 1.47 | 0.228 |
| Cerebellar grey matter | 109.62 | 25.60 | 112.52 | 11.18 | 105.98 | 11.48 | 0.017 |
| Left ventricle | 10.09 | 7.46 | 8.51 | 5.92 | 8.83 | 5.14 | 0.389 |
| Right ventricle | 9.91 | 6.21 | 9.01 | 5.55 | 9.56 | 5.44 | 0.723 |
| Third ventricle | 0.69 | 0.41 | 0.76 | 0.39 | 0.78 | 0.35 | 0.423 |
| Fourth ventricle | 1.16 | 0.37 | 1.20 | 0.42 | 1.10 | 0.36 | 0.378 |
a calculated with one-way analysis of variance; statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05.
Percentiles of brain areas and ventricle volumes.
| Brain Region | CTL | MILD | SEV | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | ±SD | Mean | ±SD | Mean | ±SD | p-Value a | |
| Whole brain | 82.09 | 17.40 | 80.56 | 21.51 | 71.09 | 27.13 | 0.029 |
| Whole brain white substance | 85.82 | 16.02 | 85.84 | 16.67 | 82.55 | 24.63 | 0.619 |
| Whole brain grey substance | 56.14 | 24.23 | 53.18 | 26.60 | 43.65 | 26.24 | 0.041 |
| Supratentorial gross cerebral cortex | 46.49 | 25.98 | 40.35 | 26.02 | 35.05 | 26.77 | 0.088 |
| Frontal right | 55.31 | 26.81 | 46.84 | 27.67 | 39.85 | 27.97 | 0.018 |
| Frontal left | 48.41 | 25.53 | 43.48 | 27.30 | 35.83 | 27.84 | 0.061 |
| Parietal right | 34.16 | 21.89 | 26.27 | 21.09 | 28.87 | 24.10 | 0.178 |
| Parietal left | 46.44 | 25.26 | 36.91 | 23.87 | 36.26 | 26.09 | 0.066 |
| Precuneus right | 47.78 | 29.91 | 45.68 | 26.00 | 42.65 | 26.69 | 0.641 |
| Precuneus left | 70.30 | 23.34 | 64.93 | 25.74 | 60.31 | 31.78 | 0.171 |
| Occipital right | 23.70 | 24.08 | 21.92 | 23.72 | 19.84 | 23.36 | 0.711 |
| Occipital left | 40.51 | 27.27 | 38.06 | 28.98 | 34.79 | 28.45 | 0.589 |
| Temporal right | 56.31 | 28.07 | 57.84 | 27.54 | 51.79 | 28.19 | 0.536 |
| Temporal left | 56.83 | 30.13 | 59.44 | 27.70 | 49.30 | 28.46 | 0.197 |
| Mesiotemporal right | 48.95 | 32.89 | 53.54 | 28.83 | 48.34 | 32.17 | 0.66 |
| Mesiotemporal left | 48.21 | 33.66 | 52.61 | 28.19 | 48.02 | 31.52 | 0.703 |
| Hippocampus right | 56.14 | 26.79 | 57.43 | 28.65 | 56.09 | 26.77 | 0.962 |
| Hippocampus left | 58.86 | 26.41 | 59.19 | 27.21 | 58.84 | 24.98 | 0.997 |
| Gyrus parahippocampalis right | 62.83 | 28.41 | 69.88 | 28.61 | 67.68 | 22.35 | 0.378 |
| Gyrus parahippocampalis left | 60.66 | 27.73 | 71.51 | 23.27 | 60.91 | 26.97 | 0.058 |
| Regio entorhinalis right | 70.46 | 26.90 | 75.37 | 21.56 | 72.13 | 19.83 | 0.543 |
| Regio entorhinalis left | 59.11 | 26.74 | 63.99 | 26.23 | 58.62 | 26.94 | 0.532 |
| Nucleus caudatus right | 40.50 | 25.82 | 52.19 | 24.97 | 40.37 | 27.25 | 0.033 |
| Nucleus caudatus left | 27.37 | 22.08 | 39.51 | 23.31 | 27.90 | 24.42 | ≤0.001 |
| Putamen right | 27.69 | 22.36 | 31.95 | 24.28 | 25.74 | 25.12 | 0.415 |
| Putamen left | 29.71 | 24.42 | 33.84 | 25.37 | 25.11 | 22.97 | 0.207 |
| Pallidum right | 36.65 | 27.64 | 40.73 | 25.44 | 36.08 | 29.20 | 0.648 |
| Pallidum left | 27.09 | 23.85 | 28.51 | 22.19 | 25.08 | 25.64 | 0.773 |
| Thalamus right | 44.43 | 30.43 | 44.14 | 28.17 | 31.93 | 27.93 | 0.052 |
| Thalamus left | 56.73 | 29.84 | 54.33 | 26.68 | 42.83 | 29.39 | 0.037 |
| Brainstem | 55.91 | 24.97 | 56.35 | 28.32 | 46.25 | 26.65 | 0.106 |
| Mesencephalon | 49.42 | 27.37 | 49.82 | 28.56 | 40.90 | 27.23 | 0.198 |
| Pons | 54.01 | 27.01 | 51.15 | 29.24 | 44.37 | 27.23 | 0.204 |
| Cerebellar grey matter | 68.01 | 24.56 | 70.45 | 25.60 | 60.24 | 27.65 | 0.127 |
| Left ventricle | 54.37 | 31.06 | 48.48 | 29.31 | 56.07 | 27.71 | 0.401 |
| Right ventricle | 54.67 | 31.64 | 51.08 | 29.46 | 56.61 | 29.85 | 0.723 |
| Third ventricle | 48.64 | 29.01 | 43.47 | 29.44 | 59.20 | 27.78 | 0.024 |
| Fourth ventricle | 48.34 | 28.67 | 54.38 | 27.16 | 48.82 | 30.70 | 0.498 |
a calculated with one-way analysis of variance; statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05.
Multivariate modelling in selected brain regions with volumetric changes following severe COVID-19 infection.
| Brain Region | Estimate | Standard Error | t-Value | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole brain | Age (years) | −2.4107 | 0.6102 | −3.951 | <0.001 |
| Gender (male) | 97.1842 | 21.3302 | 4.556 | <0.001 | |
| COVID-19 Mild | 32.6959 | 18.3726 | 1.780 | 0.077195 | |
| COVID-19 Severe | −36.1273 | 18.8432 | −1.917 | 0.057131 | |
| Height | 4.0755 | 1.0574 | 3.854 | <0.001 | |
| BMI | −0.9211 | 1.1922 | −0.773 | 0.441023 | |
| Multiple R-squared | 0.4932 | p-value | <0.001 | ||
| Grey matter | Age (years) | −2.20669 | 0.33652 | −6.557 | <0.001 |
| Gender (male) | 58.22570 | 11.76448 | 4.949 | <0.001 | |
| COVID-19 Mild | 13.84293 | 10.13324 | 1.366 | 0.17398 | |
| COVID-19 Severe | −28.64409 | 10.39277 | −2.756 | 0.00658 | |
| Height | 1.92446 | 0.58321 | 3.300 | 0.00121 | |
| BMI | 0.05646 | 0.65757 | 0.086 | 0.93169 | |
| Multiple R-squared | 0.5367 | p-value | <0.001 | ||
| Supratentorial | Age (years) | −1.53934 | 0.24475 | −6.289 | <0.001 |
| cerebral | Gender (male) | 39.97339 | 8.55623 | 4.671 | <0.001 |
| cortex | COVID-19 Mild | 5.92185 | 7.36984 | 0.803 | 0.42295 |
| COVID-19 Severe | −19.36262 | 7.55859 | −2.561 | 0.01141 | |
| Height | 1.37947 | 0.42416 | 3.252 | 0.00141 | |
| BMI | −0.41309 | 0.47824 | −0.863 | 0.38911 | |
| Multiple R-squared | 0.5097 | p-value | <0.001 | ||
| Frontal lobe | Age (years) | −0.39890 | 0.04735 | −8.425 | <0.001 |
| right | Gender (male) | 6.96303 | 1.65526 | 4.207 | <0.001 |
| COVID-19 Mild | 1.15013 | 1.42575 | 0.807 | 0.42114 | |
| COVID-19 Severe | −3.92092 | 1.46226 | −2.681 | 0.00816 | |
| Height | 0.25741 | 0.08206 | 3.137 | 0.00206 | |
| BMI | −0.09647 | 0.09252 | −1.043 | 0.29881 | |
| Multiple R-squared | 0.5397 | p-value | <0.001 | ||
| Frontal lobe | Age (years) | −0.35550 | 0.05445 | −6.529 | <0.001 |
| left | Gender (male) | 7.28431 | 1.90364 | 3.827 | <0.001 |
| COVID-19 Mild | 0.42527 | 1.63969 | 0.259 | 0.795716 | |
| COVID-19 Severe | −3.48425 | 1.68168 | −2.072 | 0.040011 | |
| Height | 0.27121 | 0.09437 | 2.874 | 0.004651 | |
| BMI | −0.13552 | 0.10640 | −1.274 | 0.204797 | |
| Multiple R-squared | 0.4524 | p-value | <0.001 | ||
| Parietal lobe | Age (years) | −0.19783 | 0.02668 | −7.414 | <0.001 |
| right | Gender (male) | 3.76298 | 0.93281 | 4.034 | <0.001 |
| COVID-19 Mild | 0.17747 | 0.80347 | 0.221 | 0.8255 | |
| COVID-19 Severe | −2.05789 | 0.82405 | −2.497 | 0.0136 | |
| Height | 0.13298 | 0.04624 | 2.876 | 0.0046 | |
| BMI | −0.00355 | 0.05214 | −0.068 | 0.9458 | |
| Multiple R-squared | 0.4866 | p-value | <0.001 | ||
| Parietal lobe | Age (years) | −0.18253 | 0.02821 | −6.47 | <0.001 |
| left | Gender (male) | 4.09906 | 0.98632 | 4.156 | <0.001 |
| COVID-19 Mild | 0.15045 | 0.84956 | 0.177 | 0.8597 | |
| COVID-19 Severe | −2.4184 | 0.87132 | −2.776 | 0.0062 | |
| Height | 0.13495 | 0.0489 | 2.76 | 0.0065 | |
| BMI | −0.048 | 0.05513 | −0.871 | 0.3853 | |
| Multiple R-squared | 0.4701 | p-value | <0.001 | ||
| Precuneus | Age (years) | −0.0379 | 0.00757 | −5.01 | <0.001 |
| right | Gender (male) | 1.1321 | 0.26447 | 4.281 | <0.001 |
| COVID-19 Mild | 0.16744 | 0.2278 | 0.735 | 0.4635 | |
| COVID-19 Severe | −0.4825 | 0.23363 | −2.065 | 0.0406 | |
| Height | 0.03398 | 0.01311 | 2.592 | 0.0105 | |
| BMI | 0.00059 | 0.01478 | 0.04 | 0.9682 | |
| Multiple R-squared | 0.4255 | p-value | <0.001 | ||
| Occipital lobe | Age (years) | −0.07167 | 0.04324 | −1.658 | 0.0995 |
| left | Gender (male) | 1.62171 | 1.51154 | 1.073 | 0.2851 |
| COVID-19 Mild | −0.10926 | 1.30195 | −0.084 | 0.9332 | |
| COVID-19 Severe | −2.81361 | 1.3353 | −2.107 | 0.0368 | |
| Height | 0.14092 | 0.07493 | 1.881 | 0.062 | |
| BMI | 0.05991 | 0.08449 | 0.709 | 0.4794 | |
| Multiple R-squared | 0.1398 | p-value | <0.001 | ||
| Thalamus | Age (years) | −0.02283 | 0.00425 | −5.375 | <0.001 |
| right | Gender (male) | 0.3445 | 0.14851 | 2.32 | 0.0217 |
| COVID-19 Mild | 0.20392 | 0.12792 | 1.594 | 0.113 | |
| COVID-19 Severe | −0.33729 | 0.13119 | −2.571 | 0.0111 | |
| Height | 0.0214 | 0.00736 | 2.906 | 0.0042 | |
| BMI | −0.00289 | 0.0083 | −0.348 | 0.7284 | |
| Multiple R-squared | 0.3903 | p-value | <0.001 | ||
| Brainstem | Age (years) | 0.0099 | 0.04076 | 0.243 | 0.8083 |
| Gender (male) | 1.54783 | 1.4248 | 1.086 | 0.2791 | |
| COVID-19 Mild | −1.4237 | 1.22724 | −1.16 | 0.2479 | |
| COVID-19 Severe | −2.84074 | 1.25867 | −2.257 | 0.0255 | |
| Height | 0.15566 | 0.07063 | 2.204 | 0.0291 | |
| BMI | 0.05938 | 0.07964 | 0.746 | 0.4571 | |
| Multiple R-squared | 0.1434 | p-value | <0.001 |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Aghagoli, G.; Gallo Marin, B.; Katchur, N.J.; Chaves-Sell, F.; Asaad, W.F.; Murphy, S.A. Neurological Involvement in COVID-19 and Potential Mechanisms: A Review. Neurocritcal Care; 2021; 34, pp. 1062-1071. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01049-4]
2. Lechien, J.R.; Chiesa-Estomba, C.M.; De Siati, D.R.; Horoi, M.; Le Bon, S.D.; Rodriguez, A.; Dequanter, D.; Blecic, S.; El Afia, F.; Distinguin, L. et al. Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions as a clinical presentation of mild-to-moderate forms of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A multicenter European study. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.; 2020; 277, pp. 2251-2261. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05965-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32253535]
3. Ortelli, P.; Ferrazzoli, D.; Sebastianelli, L.; Engl, M.; Romanello, R.; Nardone, R.; Bonini, I.; Koch, G.; Saltuari, L.; Quartarone, A. et al. Neuropsychological and neurophysiological correlates of fatigue in post-acute patients with neurological manifestations of COVID-19: Insights into a challenging symptom. J. Neurol. Sci.; 2021; 420, 117271. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2020.117271]
4. Romagnolo, A.; Balestrino, R.; Imbalzano, G.; Ciccone, G.; Riccardini, F.; Artusi, C.A.; Bozzali, M.; Ferrero, B.; Montalenti, E.; Montanaro, E. et al. Neurological comorbidity and severity of COVID-19. J. Neurol.; 2021; 268, pp. 762-769. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10123-y] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32749601]
5. Herman, C.; Mayer, K.; Sarwal, A. Scoping review of prevalence of neurologic comorbidities in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Neurology; 2020; 95, pp. 77-84. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009673]
6. Heneka, M.T.; Golenbock, D.; Latz, E.; Morgan, D.; Brown, R. Immediate and long-term consequences of COVID-19 infections for the development of neurological disease. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther.; 2020; 12, 69. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-020-00640-3]
7. Mao, L.; Jin, H.; Wang, M.; Hu, Y.; Chen, S.; He, Q.; Chang, J.; Hong, C.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, D. et al. Neurologic Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol.; 2020; 77, pp. 683-690. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1127]
8. Helms, J.; Kremer, S.; Merdji, H.; Clere-Jehl, R.; Schenck, M.; Kummerlen, C.; Collange, O.; Boulay, C.; Fafi-Kremer, S.; Ohana, M. et al. Neurologic Features in Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection. N. Engl. J. Med.; 2020; 382, pp. 2268-2270. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2008597]
9. Paterson, R.W.; Brown, R.L.; Benjamin, L.; Nortley, R.; Wiethoff, S.; Bharucha, T.; Jayaseelan, D.L.; Kumar, G.; Raftopoulos, R.E.; Zambreanu, L. et al. The emerging spectrum of COVID-19 neurology: Clinical, radiological and laboratory findings. Brain; 2020; 143, pp. 3104-3120. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa240]
10. Widmann, C.N.; Wieberneit, M.; Bieler, L.; Bernsen, S.; Grafenkamper, R.; Brosseron, F.; Schmeel, C.; Tacik, P.; Skowasch, D.; Radbruch, A. et al. Longitudinal Neurocognitive and Pulmonological Profile of Long COVID-19: Protocol for the COVIMMUNE-Clin Study. JMIR Res. Protoc.; 2021; 10, e30259. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30259] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559059]
11. Dieckmeyer, M.; Roy, A.G.; Senapati, J.; Wachinger, C.; Grundl, L.; Dopfert, J.; Bertran, P.F.; Lemke, A.; Zimmer, C.; Kirschke, J.S. et al. Effect of MRI acquisition acceleration via compressed sensing and parallel imaging on brain volumetry. Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. Biol. Med.; 2021; 34, pp. 487-497. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-020-00906-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33502667]
12. Suchyta, M.R.; Jephson, A.; Hopkins, R.O. Neurologic changes during critical illness: Brain imaging findings and neurobehavioral outcomes. Brain Imaging Behav.; 2010; 4, pp. 22-34. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11682-009-9082-3]
13. Gunther, M.L.; Morandi, A.; Krauskopf, E.; Pandharipande, P.; Girard, T.D.; Jackson, J.C.; Thompson, J.; Shintani, A.K.; Geevarghese, S.; Miller, R.R., 3rd et al. The association between brain volumes, delirium duration, and cognitive outcomes in intensive care unit survivors: The VISIONS cohort magnetic resonance imaging study*. Crit. Care Med.; 2012; 40, pp. 2022-2032. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318250acc0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22710202]
14. Manca, R.; De Marco, M.; Ince, P.G.; Venneri, A. Heterogeneity in Regional Damage Detected by Neuroimaging and Neuropathological Studies in Older Adults With COVID-19: A Cognitive-Neuroscience Systematic Review to Inform the Long-Term Impact of the Virus on Neurocognitive Trajectories. Front. Aging Neurosci.; 2021; 13, 646908. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.646908]
15. Douaud, G.; Lee, S.; Alfaro-Almagro, F.; Arthofer, C.; Wang, C.; McCarthy, P.; Lange, F.; Andersson, J.L.R.; Griffanti, L.; Duff, E. et al. SARS-CoV-2 is associated with changes in brain structure in UK Biobank. Nature; 2022; 604, pp. 697-707. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04569-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35255491]
16. Hosp, J.A.; Dressing, A.; Blazhenets, G.; Bormann, T.; Rau, A.; Schwabenland, M.; Thurow, J.; Wagner, D.; Waller, C.; Niesen, W.D. et al. Cognitive impairment and altered cerebral glucose metabolism in the subacute stage of COVID-19. Brain; 2021; 144, pp. 1263-1276. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab009]
17. Guedj, E.; Million, M.; Dudouet, P.; Tissot-Dupont, H.; Bregeon, F.; Cammilleri, S.; Raoult, D. (18)F-FDG brain PET hypometabolism in post-SARS-CoV-2 infection: Substrate for persistent/delayed disorders?. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging; 2021; 48, pp. 592-595. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04973-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32728799]
18. Duan, K.; Premi, E.; Pilotto, A.; Cristillo, V.; Benussi, A.; Libri, I.; Giunta, M.; Bockholt, H.J.; Liu, J.; Campora, R. et al. Alterations of frontal-temporal gray matter volume associate with clinical measures of older adults with COVID-19. Neurobiol. Stress; 2021; 14, 100326. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100326]
19. Griffanti, L.; Raman, B.; Alfaro-Almagro, F.; Filippini, N.; Cassar, M.P.; Sheerin, F.; Okell, T.W.; Kennedy McConnell, F.A.; Chappell, M.A.; Wang, C. et al. Adapting the UK Biobank Brain Imaging Protocol and Analysis Pipeline for the C-MORE Multi-Organ Study of COVID-19 Survivors. Front. Neurol.; 2021; 12, 753284. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.753284]
20. Lee, M.H.; Perl, D.P.; Nair, G.; Li, W.; Maric, D.; Murray, H.; Dodd, S.J.; Koretsky, A.P.; Watts, J.A.; Cheung, V. et al. Microvascular Injury in the Brains of Patients with COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med.; 2021; 384, pp. 481-483. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2033369]
21. Sanabria-Diaz, G.; Etter, M.M.; Melie-Garcia, L.; Lieb, J.M.; Psychogios, M.N.; Hutter, G.; Granziera, C. Brain cortical alterations in COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms. Front. Neurosci.; 2022; 16, 992165. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.992165] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340780]
22. Kandemirli, S.G.; Dogan, L.; Sarikaya, Z.T.; Kara, S.; Akinci, C.; Kaya, D.; Kaya, Y.; Yildirim, D.; Tuzuner, F.; Yildirim, M.S. et al. Brain MRI Findings in Patients in the Intensive Care Unit with COVID-19 Infection. Radiology; 2020; 297, pp. E232-E235. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020201697] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32384020]
23. Bougakov, D.; Podell, K.; Goldberg, E. Multiple Neuroinvasive Pathways in COVID-19. Mol. Neurobiol.; 2021; 58, pp. 564-575. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12035-020-02152-5]
24. Romoli, M.; Jelcic, I.; Bernard-Valnet, R.; Garcia Azorin, D.; Mancinelli, L.; Akhvlediani, T.; Monaco, S.; Taba, P.; Sellner, J. Infectious Disease Panel of the European Academy of Neurology. A systematic review of neurological manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection: The devil is hidden in the details. Eur. J. Neurol.; 2020; 27, pp. 1712-1726. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.14382] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32503088]
25. Calsavara, A.J.C.; Nobre, V.; Barichello, T.; Teixeira, A.L. Post-sepsis cognitive impairment and associated risk factors: A systematic review. Aust. Crit. Care; 2018; 31, pp. 242-253. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2017.06.001]
26. Jackson, J.C.; Pandharipande, P.P.; Girard, T.D.; Brummel, N.E.; Thompson, J.L.; Hughes, C.G.; Pun, B.T.; Vasilevskis, E.E.; Morandi, A.; Shintani, A.K. et al. Depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and functional disability in survivors of critical illness in the BRAIN-ICU study: A longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Respir. Med.; 2014; 2, pp. 369-379. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70051-7]
27. Julayanont, P.; Tangwongchai, S.; Hemrungrojn, S.; Tunvirachaisakul, C.; Phanthumchinda, K.; Hongsawat, J.; Suwichanarakul, P.; Thanasirorat, S.; Nasreddine, Z.S. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic: A Screening Tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Illiterate and Low-Educated Elderly Adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.; 2015; 63, pp. 2550-2554. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13820]
28. Ibi, K.; Fujii, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Senda, M.; Kitazawa, K.; Honda, A. Anterior cingulate cortex involvement in non-paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis. Brain Dev.; 2019; 41, pp. 735-739. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.braindev.2019.04.006]
29. Lu, Y.; Li, X.; Geng, D.; Mei, N.; Wu, P.Y.; Huang, C.C.; Jia, T.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, D.; Xiao, A. et al. Cerebral Micro-Structural Changes in COVID-19 Patients—An MRI-based 3-month Follow-up Study. EClinicalMedicine; 2020; 25, 100484. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100484]
30. Seidenberg, M.; Hermann, B.; Pulsipher, D.; Morton, J.; Parrish, J.; Geary, E.; Guidotti, L. Thalamic atrophy and cognition in unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc.; 2008; 14, pp. 384-393. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355617708080399]
31. Yang, A.C.; Kern, F.; Losada, P.M.; Agam, M.R.; Maat, C.A.; Schmartz, G.P.; Fehlmann, T.; Stein, J.A.; Schaum, N.; Lee, D.P. et al. Dysregulation of brain and choroid plexus cell types in severe COVID-19. Nature; 2021; 595, pp. 565-571. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03710-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34153974]
32. de Erausquin, G.A.; Snyder, H.; Carrillo, M.; Hosseini, A.A.; Brugha, T.S.; Seshadri, S. CNS SARS-CoV-2 Consortium. The chronic neuropsychiatric sequelae of COVID-19: The need for a prospective study of viral impact on brain functioning. Alzheimer’s Dement.; 2021; 17, pp. 1056-1065. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.12255]
33. Meinhardt, J.; Radke, J.; Dittmayer, C.; Franz, J.; Thomas, C.; Mothes, R.; Laue, M.; Schneider, J.; Brunink, S.; Greuel, S. et al. Olfactory transmucosal SARS-CoV-2 invasion as a port of central nervous system entry in individuals with COVID-19. Nat. Neurosci.; 2021; 24, pp. 168-175. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00758-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33257876]
34. Butowt, R.; Meunier, N.; Bryche, B.; von Bartheld, C.S. The olfactory nerve is not a likely route to brain infection in COVID-19: A critical review of data from humans and animal models. Acta Neuropathol.; 2021; 141, pp. 809-822. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00401-021-02314-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33903954]
35. Butowt, R.; Bilinska, K.; von Bartheld, C.S. Olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19: New insights into the underlying mechanisms. Trends Neurosci.; 2023; 46, pp. 75-90. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2022.11.003]
36. Postma, E.M.; Smeets, P.A.M.; Boek, W.M.; Boesveldt, S. Investigating morphological changes in the brain in relation to etiology and duration of olfactory dysfunction with voxel-based morphometry. Sci. Rep.; 2021; 11, 12704. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92224-w]
37. Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; Lin, J.; Sun, Y.; Huang, Y.; Yang, T.; Zheng, S.; Fan, M.; Zhang, J. Reduced regional gray matter volume in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A voxel-based morphometry study. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.; 2013; 34, pp. 334-339. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3235]
38. Harch, P.G.; Fogarty, E.F. Subacute normobaric oxygen and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in drowning, reversal of brain volume loss: A case report. Med. Gas Res.; 2017; 7, pp. 144-149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.208521]
39. Wilcox, M.E.; Brummel, N.E.; Archer, K.; Ely, E.W.; Jackson, J.C.; Hopkins, R.O. Cognitive dysfunction in ICU patients: Risk factors, predictors, and rehabilitation interventions. Crit. Care Med.; 2013; 41, pp. S81-S98. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a16946]
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Layer, Julian Philipp 3
; Yonah Lucas Layer 4 ; Haase, Robert 5 ; Sauer, Malte 1 ; Bieler, Luzie 6 ; Lehnen, Nils Christian 5 ; Paech, Daniel 5
; Heneka, Michael T 7 ; Radbruch, Alexander 5 ; Schmeel, Frederic Carsten 5
1 Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany;
2 Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 53127 Bonn, Germany
3 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
4 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
5 Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany;
6 Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
7 Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 53127 Bonn, Germany; Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-Belval, 4367 Luxembourg, Luxembourg