It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Plants have evolved mechanisms of adaptation to fluctuations in their environmental conditions that have been given the term “stress memory”. Synthetic wheat offers new hope for breeders to restore useful genes lost during the genetic bottleneck. We aimed to test whether drought priming and seed priming could improve drought tolerance in a diverse germplasm of synthetic and common wheat under field conditions. In this research, 27 wheat genotypes (including 20 synthetics, 4 common local and 3 common exotic bread wheat) were field evaluated under four water environments. These treatments included: 1) normal condition (N), plants were irrigated when 40% of the total available soil water was depleted from the root-zone, 2) seed priming-secondary stress (SD2), only water stress was applied at anthesis when 90% of the total available soil water was depleted and seeds were planted for evaluating, 3) primary stress- secondary stress (D1D2), primary water stress was applied at jointing stage when 70% of the total available soil water was depleted then secondary water stress was applied at the anthesis stage when 90% of the total available soil water was depleted, and 4) secondary stress (D2) only water stress was applied at the anthesis when 90% of the total available soil water was depleted. Our results indicated that improved efficient enzymatic antioxidant system leads to less yield reduction in D1D2 treatment. However, the positive effects of drought priming were more pronounced in drought primed (D1D2) than seed primed treatment (SD2). Synthetic wheat genotypes had a significant superiority in terms of yield, yield components and drought tolerance compared to common wheat genotypes. Nevertheless, the response of genotypes to stress memory was very different. Drought sensitive genotypes had better response to stress memory. Superior genotypes were identified as high yield and drought tolerant genotypes which can be used for future studies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Isfahan University of Technology, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Isfahan, Iran (GRID:grid.411751.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9908 3264)
2 Payame Noor University (PNU), Department of Agriculture, Tehran, Iran (GRID:grid.412462.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 8810 3346)