It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Interpreting the relationship between different taste function tests of different stimuli, such as chemical and electrical stimulation, is still poorly understood. This study aims to analyze visually as well as quantitatively how to interpret the relationship of results between taste function tests using different stimuli. Patients who underwent the whole mouth test and Electrogustometry (EGM) at a tertiary medical center between August 2018 and December 2018 were reviewed retrospectively with electronic medical records. Of the 110 patients, a total of 86 adults who self-reported that their taste function was normal through a questionnaire were enrolled. EGM measured the thresholds of the chorda tympani (CT) and glossopharyngeal nerve (GL) area of the tongue. The whole mouth test measured detection and recognition thresholds for sweet, salty, bitter, sour, and umami taste. Statistical analyses of Pearson’s, Spearman’s rank and polyserial correlation and multidimensional scaling (MDS) was performed. The EGM threshold for the average value of both CT regions and the recognition threshold of the whole mouth test were significantly correlated in sweet, salty, bitter, and sour taste (r = 0.244–0.398, P < 0.05), and the detection threshold was correlated only significant in sweet (r = 0.360, P = 0.007). In the MDS analysis results, the three-dimensional (D) solution was chosen over the 2-D solution because of the lower stress. Detection-, recognition threshold of whole mouth test and EGM thresholds of CT and GL area, those were standardized by Z-score, formed well-distinguished sections in the MDS analyses. The EGM threshold of the CT area was closer to the detection and recognition thresholds than the EGM threshold of the GL area. In general, the EGM threshold was closer to the recognition threshold than the detection threshold for each taste. Overall, visualization of the relationship of whole mouth test and EGM by MDS was in good agreement with quantitative analysis. EGM and whole mouth test seem to reflect different aspects of taste. However, when interpreting the EGM results, the EGM threshold of the CT area will show more similarity to the recognition threshold than the detection threshold for the whole mouth test.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gwangmyeong Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Gwangmyeong-Si, Korea (GRID:grid.254224.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0789 9563)
2 Yonsei University, Department of Medicine, Graduate School, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454)
3 Yonsei University College of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454)
4 Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454)
5 Yonsei University College of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454); Yonsei University College of Medicine, The Airway Mucus Institute, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454); Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea Mouse Sensory Phenotyping Center, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454)
6 Yonsei University College of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454); Yonsei University College of Medicine, The Airway Mucus Institute, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454); Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea Mouse Sensory Phenotyping Center, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454); Global Research Laboratory for Allergic Airway Diseases, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30)
7 Yonsei University College of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454); Yonsei University College of Medicine, The Airway Mucus Institute, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454); Global Research Laboratory for Allergic Airway Diseases, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30); Yonsei University College of Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.15444.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 5454)