It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The aim of the study was to use total DNA obtained from bone material to identify species of free-living animals based on the analysis of mtDNA fragments by molecular methods using accurate bioinformatics tools Bayesian approach and the machine learning approach. In our research, we present a case study of successful species identification based on degraded samples of bone, with the use of short mtDNA fragments. For better barcoding, we used molecular and bioinformatics methods. We obtained a partial sequence of the mitochondrial cytochrome b (Cytb) gene for Capreolus capreolus, Dama dama, and Cervus elaphus, that can be used for species affiliation. The new sequences have been deposited in GenBank, enriching the existing Cervidae mtDNA base. We have also analysed the effect of barcodes on species identification from the perspective of the machine learning approach. Machine learning approaches of BLOG and WEKA were compared with distance-based (TaxonDNA) and tree-based (NJ tree) methods based on the discrimination accuracy of the single barcodes. The results indicated that BLOG and WEKAs SMO classifier and NJ tree performed better than TaxonDNA in discriminating Cervidae species, with BLOG and WEKAs SMO classifier performing the best.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 University of Szczecin, Institute of Biology, Szczecin, Poland (GRID:grid.79757.3b) (ISNI:0000 0000 8780 7659); University of Szczecin, The Centre for Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Szczecin, Poland (GRID:grid.79757.3b) (ISNI:0000 0000 8780 7659)
2 Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biology and Animal Science, Wrocław, Poland (GRID:grid.411200.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0694 6014)
3 University of Szczecin, Institute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Szczecin, Poland (GRID:grid.79757.3b) (ISNI:0000 0000 8780 7659)
4 University of Szczecin, Institute of Biology, Szczecin, Poland (GRID:grid.79757.3b) (ISNI:0000 0000 8780 7659); Sanprobi Sp. z o. o. Sp. k., Szczecin, Poland (GRID:grid.79757.3b)