It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This paper presents an average treatment effect analysis of Spain’s furlough program during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using 2020 labour force quarterly microdata, we construct a counterfactual made of comparable nonfurloughed individuals who lost their jobs and apply propensity score matching based on their pretreatment characteristics. Our findings show that the probability of being re-employed in the next quarter significantly increased for the treated (furlough granted group). These results appear robust across models, after testing a wide range of matching specifications that reveal a reemployment probability premium of near 30 percentage points in the group of workers who had been furloughed for a single quarter. Nevertheless, a different time arrangement affected the magnitude of the effect, suggesting that it may decrease with the furlough duration. Thus, an analogous analysis for a longer (two quarter) scheme estimated a still positive but smaller effect, approximately 12 percentage points. Although this finding might alert against long lasting schemes under persistent recessions, this policy still stands as a useful strategy to face essentially transitory adverse shocks.
Highlights
We present a novel contribution that assesses the causal effects of furlough programs using updated microdata from the pandemic period in Spain.
We found key evidence of a robust and positive average effect (approx. 30 percentage points) of furlough schemes on the probability of being re-employed in the short run.
However, this positive effect was time-dependent and lessened when the furlough scheme was extended for two consecutive quarters (down to 12 percentage points). This result suggests effectiveness losses with time and advises against long-lasting schemes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 University of Huelva, Department of Economics, Faculty of Business, Huelva, Spain (GRID:grid.18803.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1769 8134); International University of Andalusia, Seville, Spain (GRID:grid.18803.32)
2 University of Huelva, Department of Economics, Faculty of Business, Huelva, Spain (GRID:grid.18803.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1769 8134); University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.5841.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0247)
3 University of Huelva, Department of Economics, Faculty of Business, Huelva, Spain (GRID:grid.18803.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1769 8134)