It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The mechanisms that regulate the patterning of branched epithelia remain a subject of long-standing debate. Recently, it has been proposed that the statistical organization of multiple ductal tissues can be explained through a local self-organizing principle based on the branching-annihilating random walk (BARW) in which proliferating tips drive a process of ductal elongation and stochastic bifurcation that terminates when tips encounter maturing ducts. Here, applied to mouse salivary gland, we show the BARW model struggles to explain the large-scale organization of tissue. Instead, we propose that the gland develops as a tip-driven branching-delayed random walk (BDRW). In this framework, a generalization of the BARW, tips inhibited through steric interaction with proximate ducts may continue their branching program as constraints become alleviated through the persistent expansion of the surrounding tissue. This inflationary BDRW model presents a general paradigm for branching morphogenesis when the ductal epithelium grows cooperatively with the domain into which it expands.
The authors show that the ramified ductal network of the mouse salivary gland develops from a set of simple probabilistic rules, where ductal elongation and branching are driven by the persistent expansion of the surrounding tissue.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 University of Cambridge, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934); University of Cambridge, Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934); Universidad de Chile, Department of Physics, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Santiago, Chile (GRID:grid.443909.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0385 4466)
2 University of Cambridge, Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934); University of Cambridge, Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934)
3 University of Cambridge, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934); University of Cambridge, Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934); University of Cambridge, Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934)