It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Sepsis is the major cause of mortality across intensive care units globally, yet details of accompanying pathological molecular events remain unclear. This knowledge gap has resulted in ineffective biomarker development and suboptimal treatment regimens to prevent and manage organ dysfunction/damage. Here, we used pharmacoproteomics to score time-dependent treatment impact in a murine Escherichia coli sepsis model after administering beta-lactam antibiotic meropenem (Mem) and/or the immunomodulatory glucocorticoid methylprednisolone (Gcc). Three distinct proteome response patterns were identified, which depended on the underlying proteotype for each organ. Gcc enhanced some positive proteome responses of Mem, including superior reduction of the inflammatory response in kidneys and partial restoration of sepsis-induced metabolic dysfunction. Mem introduced sepsis-independent perturbations in the mitochondrial proteome that Gcc counteracted. We provide a strategy for the quantitative and organotypic assessment of treatment effects of candidate therapies in relationship to dosing, timing, and potential synergistic intervention combinations during sepsis.
Sepsis can cause organ damage through disparate immunological and metabolic processes. Here the authors demonstrate a proteomics-based scoring strategy for quantifying quantitative and organotypic changes in relationship to dosing, timing, and potential synergistic intervention combinations during sepsis.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details










1 Lund, Lund University, Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361)
2 Lund, Lund University, Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361); Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.411843.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0623 9987)
3 University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Host-Microbe Systems and Therapeutics, La Jolla, USA (GRID:grid.266100.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4242)