It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Polygenic scores (PGSs) combining genetic variants found to be associated with creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcrea) have been applied in various study populations with different age ranges. This has shown that PGS explain less eGFRcrea variance in the elderly. Our aim was to understand how differences in eGFR variance and the percentage explained by PGS varies between population of general adults and elderly.
Results
We derived a PGS for cystatin-based eGFR (eGFRcys) from published genome-wide association studies. We used the 634 variants known for eGFRcrea and the 204 variants identified for eGFRcys to calculate the PGS in two comparable studies capturing a general adult and an elderly population, KORA S4 (n = 2,900; age 24–69 years) and AugUR (n = 2,272, age ≥ 70 years). To identify potential factors determining age-dependent differences on the PGS-explained variance, we evaluated the PGS variance, the eGFR variance, and the beta estimates of PGS association on eGFR. Specifically, we compared frequencies of eGFR-lowering alleles between general adult and elderly individuals and analyzed the influence of comorbidities and medication intake. The PGS for eGFRcrea explained almost twice as much (R2 = 9.6%) of age-/sex adjusted eGFR variance in the general adults compared to the elderly (4.6%). This difference was less pronounced for the PGS for eGFRcys (4.7% or 3.6%, respectively). The beta-estimate of the PGS on eGFRcrea was higher in the general adults compared to the elderly, but similar for the PGS on eGFRcys. The eGFR variance in the elderly was reduced by accounting for comorbidities and medication intake, but this did not explain the difference in R2-values. Allele frequencies between general adult and elderly individuals showed no significant differences except for one variant near APOE (rs429358). We found no enrichment of eGFR-protective alleles in the elderly compared to general adults.
Conclusions
We concluded that the difference in explained variance by PGS was due to the higher age- and sex-adjusted eGFR variance in the elderly and, for eGFRcrea, also by a lower PGS association beta-estimate. Our results provide little evidence for survival or selection bias.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer