Abstract
Brucella, the causative agent of brucellosis, is a globally significant zoonotic pathogen with serious public health implications. Understanding the molecular and genetic characteristics of Brucella species is crucial for the precise prevention, control, and epidemiological traceback investigation of brucellosis. In this study, 82 Brucella strains were genotyped via multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA-11) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST-21). Among these strains, four species and 14 biotypes were identified. MLVA-11 analysis revealed that 82 strains of bacteria contained 25 MLVA-11 genotypes, with genotype 72 (N = 10) and genotype 116 (N = 10) being the dominant genotypes. Hunter & Gaston diversity index (HGDI) analysis was conducted on the repeat results of 11 VNTR loci across all strains. These 11 VNTR loci exhibited varying degrees of polymorphism, with four loci demonstrating high levels of polymorphism. Notably, the 18 loci presented the highest degree of polymorphism, with a polymorphism index reaching 0.712. MLST-21 analysis revealed that 82 strains of Brucella contained 16 genotypes, with ST-8 (N = 33) being the dominant genotype. This study elucidates the phylogenetic relationships among diverse Brucella species. A comparison of the clustering results for 82 Brucella strains obtained via the two methods revealed that the MLVA-11 typing results more reliably encompassed the typing information provided by MLST-21. These findings provide novel insights into the molecular epidemiology of Brucella, which may facilitate the development of more effective strategies for brucellosis prevention and control.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Huazhong Agricultural University, National Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology and Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.35155.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1790 4137); National Reference Laboratory for Animal Brucellosis, China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.418540.c)
2 National Reference Laboratory for Animal Brucellosis, China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.418540.c)
3 National Reference Laboratory for Animal Brucellosis, China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.418540.c); Shanxi Agricultural University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Taigu, China (GRID:grid.412545.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1798 1300)
4 Huazhong Agricultural University, National Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology and Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.35155.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1790 4137)




