The use of mechanical motion as a natural source of power is gradually replacing battery or electrical power in driving smart electronics. In recent years, piezoelectric nanogenerator (PENG) based on piezoelectric materials has gained tremendous attention for its remarkable ability to convert mechanical energy into electrical energy.[1] Lead halide perovskites (ABX3, A = methyl ammonium, formamidinium (FA, Cs; B = Pb; X = Cl, Br, and I) have become a research hotspot as not only optoelectronics but also PENG due to its unique optical properties and asymmetry of crystal structure.[2] The first lead halide perovskite employed in the fabrication of PENG is MAPbI3, which exhibits output voltage and current density of 2.7 V and 140 nA cm−2, respectively.[3] Later, FAPbBr3-based PENG is developed with output voltage and current density of 8.5 V and 3.8 µA cm−2, respectively.[4] Considering the stability of perovskites as well as flexible applications, composites of piezoelectric polymers and perovskites are gradually being mushroomed. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and its copolymers are the most widely used in PENG such as PVDF/MAPbI3,[5] PVDF/MAPbBr3,[6] PVDF/FAPbBr3,[7] PVDF/MAPbI3,[8] PVDF/CsPbBr3,[9] and PVDF/CsPbI3,[10] because of their relatively high piezoelectric coefficients.[11] However, the dipoles of composite materials are generally in a random arrangement, which obviously limits the improvement of piezoelectric properties.[12] In addition, the buffering effect of elastic polymer PVDF causes the composite material to deform unevenly, creating a piezoelectric potential difference that makes a certain amount of polarized charge to be trapped in the material without contributing to the output current.[13] These reasons lead to the unsatisfactory piezoelectric properties of composites.
At present, there are three strategies to enhance the dipole orientation toward outstanding piezoelectric performance. The first approach is to induce dipole alignment of piezoelectric materials by an electric poling process.[14] However, materials with low breakdown voltages and large coercivity voltages are difficult to be polarized. In addition, the electric polarization of piezoelectric materials usually requires a long time of treatment under high temperatures and strong voltage, resulting in wasted energy and higher manufacturing cost.[15] Meanwhile, the removal of the external electric field and heating condition causes depolarization of the material, which damages the stability of piezoelectric properties.[16] The second approach is to control the orientation of materials (called texturing).[17] However, the special template and complex synthesis process of texturing cause it to be effective for 1D and 2D materials but not for granular materials.[18] The third approach is the self-polarization effect by introducing interfacial polarization between different components.[19] By comparison, the self-polarization method is more suitable for extensive industrial applications due to its low cost and simple synthesis process. Sultana et al. prepared PVDF/MAPbBr3 composites by electrospinning and found that the strong electric field and mechanical stretching of the electrospinning process caused in situ polarization of PVDF.[6] According to our group's previous work, PVDF/CsPbBr3 composites can obtain high piezoelectric output (V = 33 V) without external electric field polarization.[9c] Regrettably, the performance of piezoelectric composites obtained by this method is still far from electric poling.[9a]
Synthesizing heterojunctions with a strong built-in electric field can effectively transfer electrons which is an effective way to relieve trapped polarized charge.[20] MXene, as a promising energy storage material, has attracted great interest due to its unique features such as excellent electronic conductivity, obvious security capability, environmental benignity, and excellent biocompatibility.[21] Liu et al. synthesized the MXene/COF/Cu2O heterojunction for photocatalytic sterilization.[22] Efficient photocatalysis is achieved due to the strong built-in electric field generated at the heterojunction interface promoting rapid carrier migration. The as-constructed MoS2@MXene@D-TiO2 heterostructure in sodium-ion batteries delivers admirable high-rate reversible capacity due to the built-in electric field between the non-homogeneous phases that promotes the high Na+ transportation.[23] Meanwhile, Agresti et al. suggested that the formation of heterojunctions between MXene and perovskite could regulate the arrangement of dipole moments.[24] Therefore, the construction of MXene heterojunction with perovskite is expected to improve both the arrangement of dipole moments and the utilization of polarized charges.
Herein, CsPbBr3–Ti3C2Tx heterojunctions are first constructed in PVDF fibers, providing a path for the transfer of polarized charges inside the film and macroscopically enhancing the output performance of the devices. Meanwhile, the PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx composite achieved self-polarization without an additional electric field. Further, the mechanism of self-polarization is explained by analyzing the interfacial charge and electric field using first-principles calculation. Besides, the piezoelectric outputs of PENG under experimental and practical conditions are also investigated systematically.
Results and Discussion Preparation and Characterization of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx Composite FiberThe PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx composite fibers were fabricated through the electrospinning method, as schematically illustrated in Figure 1. First, Ti3C2Tx nanosheets were synthesized by HF/HCl etching and LiCl intercalation of Ti3AlC2[25] (Figure 1a). Then, the electrospinning precursor was prepared by a simple mixing process, whereby Ti3C2Tx, CsBr, PbBr2, oleylamine (OAm), oleic acid (OA), and PVDF were added to DMF solution and homogenized via stirring at 60 °C (Figure 1b). According to our previous studies, PVDF/4 wt% CsPbBr3 exhibits the best self-polarization effect and piezoelectric properties.[9c] Thus, the 4 wt% CsPbBr3 was used to construct heterojunction with different contents of Ti3C2T x(0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 wt%). Finally, the precursor was drawn under the high electric field to obtain fibers (Figure 1c). The detailed preparation process and basic characterization of Ti3C2Tx are described in Part 1 (Figures S1–S4, Supporting Information) of the Supporting Information. In addition, the elaborated preparation process of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx composite fiber is shown in Part 2 (Figures S5 and S6, Supporting Information) of the Supporting Information.
Figure 1. a) Preparation process of Ti3C2Tx nanosheets. b) The synthesis process of composite precursor. c) Schematic illustration of the electrospinning system.
As shown in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image, the lateral size of Ti3C2Tx nanosheets is about 400 nm (Figure 2a and Figure S3, Supporting Information) and the thickness is 2.4 nm (Figure 2c). The almost transparent transmission electron microscope (TEM) image (Figure S2e, Supporting Information) and the hexagonal arrangement of the atoms (Figure 2b) confirm the successful preparation of Ti3C2Tx nanosheets. For X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern, the typical peak (104) of Ti3AlC2 disappears, and (002) shifts to a lower angle again confirming the successful preparation of ultrathin Ti3C2Tx nanosheets (Figure S2j, Supporting Information). This exfoliation technique results in abundant surface termination with OH, F, O, and Cl (Figure S2k–p, Supporting Information), providing conditions for the formation of heterojunction.
Figure 2. a) SEM, b) HRTEM and SAED, and c) AFM images of Ti3C2Tx. d–i) SEM images of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx (0 wt% Ti3C2Tx (d), 0.2 wt% Ti3C2Tx (e), 0.4 wt% Ti3C2Tx (f), 0.6 wt% Ti3C2Tx (g), 0.8 wt% Ti3C2Tx (h), 1.0 wt% Ti3C2Tx (i)). j) TEM image of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx (0.6 wt% Ti3C2Tx) fiber. k) HRTEM image and SAED of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx (0.6 wt% Ti3C2Tx) fiber. l) The interface of CsPbBr3–Ti3C2Tx and corresponding Fourier transformation (Zoomed-in view of (k)). m) The structure schematic diagram of the interface of CsPbBr3–Ti3C2Tx. TEM images of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx (0.6 wt% Ti3C2Tx) fiber in the n) dark field and o) element mapping.
SEM images of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx composite fiber films are presented in Figure 2d–i. The fibers are uniform in diameter and high-alignment in orientation. Optical images of fiber films under normal light and 365 nm ultra-violet (UV) light are shown in the inset of Figure 2d–i. The green photoluminescence (PL) emission of the fiber implies the uniform growth of CsPbBr3 and Ti3C2Tx in PVDF fibers. As shown in Figure S7, Supporting Information, the diameter of the fiber decreases with increasing Ti3C2Tx content. In electrospinning process, droplets are charged to produce jets that stretch to form fibers after overcoming the surface tension of the liquid.[26] Therefore, the size of the fiber is mainly influenced by the Coulomb force and surface tension. Viscosity tests for each component precursor are listed in Figure S8, Supporting Information. The viscosity of the precursor gradually increases with increasing Ti3C2Tx content, which represents an increase in the surface tension of the precursor. Theoretically, the fiber diameter increases with the increase of surface tension. Here, the regular decrease in fiber diameter is due to the addition of Ti3C2Tx improves the conductivity of the precursor, making the increase in Coulombic force greater than the effect of surface tension.
Figure 2j,n reveals the TEM image of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx (0.6 wt% Ti3C2Tx) fibers in dark and bright fields. It can be seen that CsPbBr3 is uniformly dispersed inside the fibers, while the Ti3C2Tx is inserted into the fiber. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images demonstrate that Ti3C2Tx nanosheets retain the hexagonal crystal structure of the parent Ti2AlC phase (the insert of Figure 2k). The crystal plane spacing of 0.21 and 0.26 nm are corresponding to the (220) crystal plane of CsPbBr3[27] and (100) crystal plane of Ti3C2Tx[28] (Figure 2l). The white interface implies the formation of Ti3C2Tx–CsPbBr3 heterojunction. The structure schematic diagram of the interface of CsPbBr3–Ti3C2Tx is exhibited in Figure 2m, which will be discussed in detail in the calculation section. The corresponding element mapping also confirmed the homogeneous distribution of CsPbBr3 in the fibers and the presence of Ti3C2Tx (Figure 2o).
XRD spectra of composite films are revealed in Figure 3a. The two peaks prominent at 18.3° and 20.4° correspond to the α phase and β phase of PVDF. The peaks arise at 15.1°, 21.5°, 30.6°, 34.4°, 37.8°, and 43.9° correspond to the (100), (110), (200), (210), (211), and (220) crystal plane of CsPbBr3(PDF# 54–0752), confirming the formation of CsPbBr3 nanoparticles within the polymer fiber. However, due to the low loading weight percent and uniform dispersion of Ti3C2Tx, the peak representing Ti3C2Tx did not appear in XRD spectra. The crystalline forms of composite films are further explored by the fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) as shown in Figure 3b. The calculation method of β phase content is exposed in the Supporting Information. With the addition of 4 wt% CsPbBr3, the β phase content increased from 78.7% to 94.6% (Figure S9, Supporting Information), due to the formation of a built-in electric field by the addition of CsPbBr3 nanoparticles. The addition of Ti3C2Tx brings the β phase content to a maximum of 95.4% due to a further increase of the built-in electric field, which is confirmed in the calculation section.
Figure 3. a) XRD and b) FTIR spectra of composite films. High-resolution XPS spectra of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx (0.6 wt% Ti3C2Tx) composite film: c) C, d) F, e) Cs, f) Pb, g) Br, and h) Ti. i) Dielectric permittivity and j) dielectric loss of composite films. k) Phase and l) amplitude hysteresis loop of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx (0.6 wt% Ti3C2Tx) fiber.
The surface composition and chemical states of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx (0.6 wt% Ti3C2Tx) are investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Figure S10, Supporting Information, unveils the full XPS spectrum of composite film, where the signals related to C, F, Cs, Pb, Br, and Ti. The C1s peak exhibit three components at 284.8, 286.5, and 291.0 eV corresponding to CC, HCH, and FCF bond of PVDF, respectively (Figure 3c).[29] F1s has a single peak at 688.1 eV, which is consistent with the organic fluorine (Figure 3d). Cs 3d3/2 and 3d5/2 peaks are observed at 738.2 and 724.3 eV (Figure 3e), consistent with the results of the Cs+ state. Peaks of Pb 4f5/2 and 4f7/2 appear at 146.8 and 141.9 eV (Figure 3f), representing the Pb2+ cations.[30] The Br 3d3/2 and 3d5/2 have the binding energy of 69.3 and 68.2 eV, with energy differences of 1 eV (Figure 3g), corresponding to Br− state. The peaks occur at 457.2 and 463.1 eV, corresponding to TiC bond of Ti3C2Tx (Figure 3h), which again verifies the presence of Ti3C2Tx in the fiber. The high-resolution XPS spectra of PVDF, PVDF/CSPbBr3 and PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx are compared in Figure S11, Supporting Information. The interactions of HCH and FCF weaken with the addition of Ti3C2Tx, which is the result of the enhanced interaction of the end groups F and H with Ti3C2Tx. The peak of Pb 4f is shifted to the left by 4 eV after addition of Ti3C2Tx, indicating a strong interaction between the Ti3C2Tx and under-coordinated Pb atoms, formatting the heterojunctions.
The performance of PENG is directly dependent on its piezoelectric constant (d33), which is proportional to the dielectric permittivity and the remnant polarization.[31] Here, the dielectric permittivity and dielectric loss of composites are measured in Figure 3i,j. The dielectric permittivity of composites increases gradually from 14 for 0 wt% Ti3C2Tx to the highest value of 58 for 1.0 wt% Ti3C2Tx at the frequency of 100 Hz. The addition of Ti3C2Tx increases the interfacial polarization, which is confirmed in the calculation section, leading to an increase in the dielectric coefficient.[32] The dielectric loss is two orders of magnitude smaller than the dielectric constant. Due to the low-frequency oscillation, more attention is paid to the data pattern after 1000 Hz. However, the dielectric loss increases with the increase of Ti3C2Tx because the increase of Ti3C2Tx forms a conducting path. The increase in dielectric loss is detrimental to the piezoelectric performance. Finally, a quasi-static d33 meter was used to measure the d33 of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx films as 36.1 pC/N. The detailed test method and procedure are shown in Figure S12, Supporting Information.
Further, the topography, amplitude, and phase images of piezoresponse force microscope (PFM) are shown in Figure S13, Supporting Information. The amplitude image clearly shows the piezoelectric response, while the phase image indicates the significant distribution of ferroelectric domains. Besides, the amplitude and phase response loops have been obtained by applying DC bias from −10 to +10 V. The phase response loop indicates the polarization change under electric field (Figure 3k). The butterfly-shaped amplitude loop indicates the electrostriction induced by the inverse piezoelectric effect (Figure 3l). The two transition points near the bottom of the loop represent the dipole switching behavior. The slight offset near the center of the loop reveals that there exists a built-in field within the film generated by the spontaneous polarization.
Performance of PENG Based on PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx Composite FiberTo investigate the piezoelectric properties of composite films, the top–bottom configuration of PENG is prepared, where polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is a surface adhesion and passivation layer. The detailed fabrication procedure of PENG is illustrated in Figure 4a. Figure 4b exhibits the cross-section SEM image and corresponding element mapping. It can be seen that the thickness of the film is about 100 µm and it is closely connected to the Al foil electrode, avoiding the influence of triboelectricity. The effective device size of the film is 1 × 1 cm2.
Figure 4. a) The fabrication procedure of PENG. b) The cross-section SEM image of the device and corresponding element mapping. The c) Isc density and d) Voc of PENG based on composite. The e) Isc density and f) Voc of PENG based on PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx (0.6 wt% Ti3C2Tx) under different frequencies. The g) Isc density and h) Voc of PENG based on PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx under different external load resistance from 1 MΩ to 1 GΩ. i,j) The tendency of Isc density, Voc, and the power density of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx under different external load resistance from 1 MΩ to 1 GΩ. The output of k) PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx under 100 °C for different times and l) soaking in water for different times. m) Output recorded over time for continuous 2000 cycles.
The piezoelectric output of short-circuit current (Isc) density and open-circuit voltage (Voc) of composite are measured under palm tap (Figure 4c,d). The tapping force is about 25 N (Figure S14, Supporting Information) and the frequency is 1 Hz. The Isc density increased from 0.3 to 1.3 µA cm−2 as Ti3C2Tx mass fraction increased from 0 to 0.6 wt%. The Isc density of 0.6 wt% Ti3C2Tx is about 4.3 times larger than 0 wt% Ti3C2Tx. Similarly, as the Ti3C2Tx increased from 0 to 0.6 wt%, Voc increased from 33 to 160 V and then decreased from 160 to 15 V with a further increase in Ti3C2Tx. The best performance was obtained at 0.6 wt% Ti3C2Tx addition caused by the most appropriate dielectric constant and dielectric loss values. The photograph of the test system is shown in Figure S15, Supporting Information. Thus PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx (0.6 wt% Ti3C2Tx) was selected for subsequent tests. The performance of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx at different frequencies was examined in Figure 4e,f. The Isc and Voc remain stable in the range of 0.2–1.5 Hz, indicating that they can perform energy harvesting and conversion tasks in a wide frequency range. Table 1 compares the piezoelectric performance based on some self-polarized PENG. Compared to other self-polarized PENG devices, the PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx has a significant output voltage. A switching-polarity test was performed as shown in Figure S16, Supporting Information. It verifies that the output signal comes from the PENG and not from the instrument.
Table 1 Comparison of piezoelectric performance based on some self-polarized PENGs
Composite | Preparation method | Output voltage [V] | Applied force | Active area [cm2] | Ref. |
PVDF/Gly-MoS2 | Casted | 8.2 | 50 KPa | 1 × 2 | [33] |
PVDF/FAPbBr3 | Casted | 20 | 0.5 MPa | 1.2 × 1.4 | [7] |
PVDF/PZT | 3D printing | 60 | 255 KPa | 1 × 1 | [34] |
PVDF-TrFE/CNT | Electrospinning | 0.4 | — | 2.1 | [19c] |
PVDF/h-BN | Electrospinning | 8.3 | — | 1 × 1 | [35] |
PVDF/MAPbI3 | Casted | 1.8 | Finger tap | 1 × 1 | [5] |
PVDF/PtNPs | Casted | 18 | Finger tap | 0.3 | [36] |
PVDF/MAPbBr | Electrospinning | 5 | Finger tap | 2.4 × 1.5 | [6] |
PVDF/CsPbBr3 | Casted | 120 | Finger tap | — | [37] |
PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx | Electrospinning | 160 | Palm tap | 1 × 1 | This work |
Figure 4g–j displays the Isc and Voc of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx with external resistance load. The external load range is from 1 MΩ to 1GΩ, the Isc density drops from 1 µA cm−2 to 0.2 nA cm−2 and Voc rises from 2 to 160 V. The power density of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx reaches the maximum value of 36.4 µW cm−2 at an external contact resistance of 100 MΩ. Besides, thermal and water stability of the device was investigated by recording the output at 100 °C and immersed water at different times. The Voc of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx decreases from 160 to 150 V when held at 100 °C for 1 day to 1 month (Figure 4k). Further, the Voc of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx remained stable after immersing the device in water for 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month (Figure 4l). Finally, a continuous stability test is conducted to investigate the lifetime of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx. After 2000 cycles, it still maintains a large output with Voc of 160 V (Figure 4m).
Mechanism AnalysisFirst, to explain the observed piezoelectric properties and reveal the basic fundamental of heterojunction-enhanced self-polarization, it is crucial to understand the interactions between substances in composites. Here, the electron distribution and electric field magnitude of Ti3C2Tx, CsPbBr3, and PVDF interface are calculated separately using first-principles calculation. The PVDF–CsPbBr3 interfacial interactions have been studied in previous papers.[9c] Here, we focus on the interfacial interactions between Ti3C2Tx–CsPbBr3 and Ti3C2Tx–PVDF. To quantify the stability of the interfaces, the binding energy (Eb) is first calculated by Equation (1): [Image Omitted. See PDF]where EAB, EA, and EB are the energy of interfaces. S is the surface area. The calculated Eb of Ti3C2Tx–CsBr, Ti3C2Tx–PbBr, and Ti3C2Tx–PVDF are −0.0189, −0.0707, and −0.0093 eV Å−2, respectively. The negative Eb suggests that the interfaces could form in the experiments in the view of thermodynamics. Nevertheless, the more negative Eb of Ti3C2Tx–PbBr indicates that it is more stable in the experiments.
The charge density isosurfaces of the charge redistribution upon formation of Ti3C2Tx–CsBr, Ti3C2Tx–PbBr, and Ti3C2Tx–PVDF are calculated and displayed in Figure 5a–c. The cyan and yellow isosurfaces set as 0.0005 e a0−3 reflect the charge depletion and accumulation region, respectively. There is a large amount of charge transfer and exchange between Ti3C2Tx and PbBr. It can be seen that the charge exchange is mainly concentrated between the Pb and O atoms. [Image Omitted. See PDF]where ρAB, ρA, and ρB are the charge density of interfaces AB, A, and B, respectively. Based on ∆q, the charge displacement curve is calculated by Equation (3): [Image Omitted. See PDF]
Figure 5. Interface induced charge density isosurface. a) Ti3C2Tx-CsBr, b) Ti3C2Tx-PbBr, and c) Ti3C2Tx-PVDF. Planar averaged electrostatic potential. d) Ti3C2Tx-CsBr, e) Ti3C2Tx-PbBr, and f) Ti3C2Tx-PVDF. Charge density difference and charge displacement curve of g) Ti3C2Tx-CsBr, h) Ti3C2Tx-PbBr, and i) Ti3C2Tx-PVDF.
The positive and negative gradients of ∆Q in the interfacial region represent charge accumulation and depletion. The planar average electrostatic potential and the local potential at the interface are shown in Figure 5d–f. ∆Q of CsPbBr3–Ti3C2Tx and PVDF–Ti3C2Tx heterojunction is shown in Figure 5g–i. The charge information and electric field at the interface of CsPbBr3 and PVDF are shown in Figure S17, Supporting Information. The comparison reveals that the interfacial charge aggregation of Ti3C2Tx–PbBr was at most 0.7 e Å−1, causing a strong electric field at the interface, which provides the necessary conditions for the self-polarization of the composite and the movement of the polarized charge. Meanwhile, the strong interaction between Ti3C2Tx and the undercoordinated Pb atom provides conditions for the formation of heterojunctions, which has been confirmed by the results of XPS and TEM. As a result, the heterojunction significantly enhances the self-polarization of the composite and makes the dipole arrangement more orderly, thus enhancing the piezoelectric properties of the composite.
Second, the origin of the direct piezoelectric effect stems from the behavior of the surface charge as the material is subjected to stress that changes the polarization level.[38] PVDF has a force buffering effect that retains a certain amount of polarized charge in the material thus weakening the piezoelectric output of the material. Zhou et al. created a multi-layered PENG with a 3D interdigitated electrode that effectively exported the internal polarized charge, resulting in a significant increase in output current.[39] Therefore, we construct CsPbBr3–Ti3C2Tx heterojunctions in PVDF fibers to provide a path for the transfer of polarized charges inside the film. The band structure of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx is shown in Figure S18, Supporting Information. The band gap of heterostructure is zero, which provides sites and channels for the aggregation and transfer of polarized charges. The working mechanism of composite is displayed in Figure 6. For PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx-PENG, the electric dipoles of the composite have relatively uniform orientation under the effect of self-polarization of the built-in electric field (Figure 6a). Under compression to the PENG, the presence of self-polarization with deformation dipoles leads to the generation of polarization charges on the material surface, which are attracted to the charged surfaces of material and accumulate to form a piezoelectric potential. The external free charges migrate to the electrodes and accumulate to balance the piezoelectric potential. The heterogeneous interface between CsPbBr3 and Ti3C2Tx can be regarded as a Schottky barrier,[40] which dominates the transport process of free charges. As a result, the polarization charges are first trapped and aggregated on the Ti3C2Tx nanosheets and migrate rapidly through Ti3C2Tx to the electrode's surface, leading the more polarization charges on the electrode's surface (Figure 6b). When the external stress is released, the accumulated charges flow back in the opposite direction (Figure 6c).
Figure 6. a–c) The working mechanism of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx-PENG. d–f) Schematic illustration of the contribution of the sample to the polarization.
Finally, under the strong electric field and mechanical stretching of electrospinning, PVDF with 78% content of β phase has a certain net dipolar (Pd) polarization (Figure 6d). CsPbBr3 acts as a nucleating agent to increase the β phase of PVDF to 94%, leading to a high extra polarization (ΔPd). In addition, CsPbBr3 also induces space charge polarization (Ps) at the interface of the polymer matrix (Figure 6e). When Ti3C2Tx was introduced, both the β phase content and space charge polarization are further enhanced. Accordingly, the presence of both fillers may ultimately result in considerable changes in polarization as expressed with the summation of each contribution, Pd + ΔPd + Ps + ΔPs (Figure 6f).
Practical Application of PENGTo test the charging capability of the device, the AC signal is converted into a DC signal by a rectifier bridge. Figure 7a depicts the circuit diagram of a capacitor being charged. The recorded energy-storing process is presented in Figure 7b. The capacitors with different capacitances of 1, 2.2, and 10 µF are charged to 6.3, 2.6, and 0.9 V in 60 s. Figure 7c is the zoomed-in view of the red square marked in Figure 7b from 1 to 5 s. The capacitor (1 µF) is charged from 0.44 to 0.07 V in 18 working cycles, the corresponding charging rate can be calculated as 20.6 nC per cycle, reaffirming the considerable piezoelectric outputs.
Figure 7. a) The circuit diagram of a capacitor being charged. b) Charging curves of capacitors with different capacitance values. c) Zoomed-in view of the charging curve of 1 µF from 0 to 5 s. The output of PENG under d) finger bending, e) finger tapping, and f) foot stepping. g) Light up LEDs and h) commercial electronic watch.
The piezoelectric response of several movements such as finger bending, finger tapping, and foot stepping were investigated to explore the collection of mechanical energy of human movement by PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx-PENG (Figure 7d–f). It can be seen that the PENG has a good piezoelectric response to the mechanical energy of human movement. Meanwhile, the response signal of pressure is more prominent compared with bending. Without any storage device, the PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx-PENG lit 150 commercial green LEDs (Figure 7g and Video S1, Supporting Information). In addition, a commercial electronic meter is successfully lit using a 2.2 µF capacitor voltage regulator (Figure 7h and Video S2, Supporting Information).
ConclusionHigh output and self-polarized PVDF/4 wt% CsPbBr3/0.6 wt% Ti3C2Tx-PENG is prepared by constructing CsPbBr3–Ti3C2Tx heterojunction. On the one hand, PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx exhibits high polarization of Pd + ΔPd + Ps+ ΔPs due to high β phase content and strong space charge polarization. On the other hand, the CsPbBr3–Ti3C2Tx heterojunction provides a channel to accumulate and transfer polarization charges, making full utilize the polarized charges inside of film, leading to the macroscopic enhancement of its piezoelectric output. Meanwhile, the strong interfacial electric field induced by the interfacial interaction of CsPbBr3–Ti3C2Tx enables the composites to achieve self-polarization, making it possible to produce energy-efficient harvesters with low energy consumption. PVDF/4 wt% CsPbBr3/0.6 wt% Ti3C2Tx-PENG exhibits outstanding voltage output of 160 V, which is higher than other self-polarization PENG previously. In addition, it exhibits better water and thermal stability attributed to the protection of PVDF. The outstanding output can charge a 1 µF capacitor from 0 to 6.3 V in 60 s. In application, PVDF/4 wt% CsPbBr3/0.6 wt% Ti3C2Tx-PENG can directly power commercial green 150 LEDs without external storage and an electronic meter using a 2.2 µF capacitor voltage regulator.
Experimental Section Preparation of Ti3C2Tx NanosheetsTi3C2Tx nanosheets were synthesized by selective etching of Al from Ti3AlC2 (particle size <30 µm) using HF/HCl etchant. The etching solution was prepared by mixing 6 mL deionized water (DI water), 12 mL hydrochloric acid (HCl, Aladdin, 37%), and 2 mL hydrofluoric acid (HF, Macklin, 40%). 1 g Ti3AlC2 was slowly added to the etchant solution for about 5 min and then stirred at 400 rpm for 24 h at 35 °C. The as-obtained multilayer Ti3C2Tx was washed with DI water and centrifuged at 3500 rpm (5 min per time) until pH ≥ 6. The precipitate was collected and redispersed into 20 mL DI water by shaking, and then added to a solution of 40 mL DI water containing 1 g LiCl and stirred at 400 rpm for 4 h at 35 °C. The obtained Ti3C2Tx dispersions were washed by centrifugation at 8000 rpm using DI water until the pH exceeded 6. Further, the sediment was redispersed in 35 mL DMF solution to probe sonicated in a cold bath for 20 min (power: 600 w). The supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 1 h. For the quantitative analysis of Ti3C2Tx content in DMF, 2 mL of the solution was dried under a vacuum at 60 °C.
Fabrication of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx Composite NanogeneratorThe composite nanofibers were prepared by the electrospinning method. Initially, the Ti3C2Tx suspension (solvent was DMF) was added to the DMF solution and sonicated for 30 min to obtain a uniformly dispersed solution. Subsequently, CsBr and PbBr2 were added to the above solution and stirred for 20 min to dissolve it fully. The OAm and oleic acid (OA) were added and stirred magnetically for 20 min at 500 rpm. Finally, PVDF (molecular weight 1 200 000) was added to obtain the precursor solution by magnetically stirring at 60 °C for 4 h with a weight concentration of 14%. The prepared precursor was drawn into a syringe with a 0.5 mm inner diameter stainless-steel needle for electrospinning. Electrospinning fibers were collected at a stainless-steel rotating cartridge collector with a speed of 3000 rpm. The distance from the needle to the collector was 18 cm. The flow rate was maintained at 0.04 mm min−1. The applied voltage was set as 15 kV. Inside the electrospinning machine, the temperature was set to 30 °C, and the humidity was adjusted to 60%. Then, the electrospinning film was dried for 2 h in a normal oven at 80 °C. PENG was the top-bottom–electrode configuration.
First, electrospinning fiber film was cut to the appropriate size (1 cm × 1 cm) as an active layer. Then the aluminum foil serves as the top and bottom electrodes bonded to both sides of the active layer via PDMS. Finally, it was encapsulated by polyimide (PI) tape.
Characterization and MeasurementsThe surface morphology of the samples was characterized by a field emission scanning electron microscope on Gemini Sigma 300/VP. Microstructure of Ti3C2Tx and PVDF/CsPbBr3 fiber was performed by TEM, selected area electron diffraction (SAED), and HRTEM on Tecnai G2 F30 S-TWIN. Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) was utilized to test the morphology and thickness of Ti3C2Tx nanosheets. Besides, the local piezoelectric properties were investigated with PFM based on an AFM system (Bruker Multimode 8). The dielectric properties were measured by a precision LCR meter (Agilent 4294A) at room temperature. The absorbance of Ti3C2Tx in DMF solution was measured by a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Persee, TU-1901). The viscosity of the precursor was obtained by a viscometer (DV2T-LV). The phase structure was characterized using XRD on Ultima IV and FTIR on Nicolet IS10. The surface electronic states of PVDF/CsPbBr3 fiber film were measured by XPS using AXI ULTRA with a monochromatic Al Kα source. Electrical analysis was accomplished by applying an external force on the PENG through a linear motor (Lin Mot, BSDLCA32-012/LCC) and recorded by a source measure unit (Keithley Instruments). The quasi-static d33 measuring instrument (ZJ-3AN) was used to measure d33. The value of the palm tap force was measured by a pressure sensor (SIMBATOUCH-SBT961M).
Computational DetailsThe first-principles calculation was performed in the framework of density functional theory (DFT) via Vienna ab-initio simulation package code.[41] The exchange–correlation functional was presented by the generalized gradient approximation in the form of Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof.[42] The core–electron interaction was treated by the projector-augmented wave method.[43] The long-range weak van der Waals interactions were described by Grimme's DFT-D3 dispersion correction.[44] The cutoff energy was set as 460 eV. The convergency criteria of energy and Hellman–Feynman forces on each atom were set as 1 × 10−4 eV per atom and 0.05 eV Å−1, respectively. The Brillouin zone was sampled by a k-point mesh 4 × 4 × 3. Based on the optimized CsPbBr3 crystal, the slab models with seven octahedron layers were constructed by slicing the CsPbBr3 crystal along (110) lattice plane. The slab terminated by CsBr and PbBr were both considered and a vacuum layer with the size of 20 Å was added along z-axis to avoid interactions between mirror slabs. The dipole correction along z-axis of slab was implemented to correct the errors introduced by the periodic boundary conditions. Considering the limited computational resource, a section of the PVDF was selected to investigate the interaction between CsPbBr3-PVDF and Ti3C2Tx-PVDF.
AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 52025041), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51902020, 51974021, and 52250091), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of NO. FRF-TP-20-02C2. This project was supported by the open foundation of the Guangxi Key Laboratory of Processing for Non-ferrous Metals and Featured Materials, Guangxi University (Grant No. 2021GXYSOF12), and the Interdisciplinary Research Project for Young Teachers of USTB (Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities) (FRF-IDRY-21-028). [Correction added on June 23rd, 2023, after first online publication: Tao Yang was added as corresponding author]
Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data Availability StatementThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Piezoelectric nanogenerator (PENG) for practical application is constrained by low output and difficult polarization. In this work, a kind of flexible PENG with high output and self-polarization is fabricated by constructing CsPbBr3–Ti3C2Tx heterojunctions in PVDF fiber. The polarized charges rapidly migrate to the electrodes from the Ti3C2Tx nanosheets by forming heterojunctions, achieving the maximum utilization of polarized charges and leading to enhanced piezoelectric output macroscopically. Optimally, PVDF/4wt%CsPbBr3/0.6wt%Ti3C2Tx-PENG exhibits an excellent voltage output of 160 V under self-polarization conditions, which is higher than other self-polarized PENG previously. Further, the working principle and self-polarization mechanism are uncovered by calculating the interfacial charge and electric field using first-principles calculation. In addition, PVDF/4wt%CsPbBr3/0.6wt%Ti3C2Tx-PENG exhibits better water and thermal stability attributed to the protection of PVDF. It is also evaluated in practice by harvesting the energy from human palm taps and successfully lighting up 150 LEDs and an electronic watch. This work presents a new idea of design for high-performance self-polarization PENG.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Institute for Carbon Neutrality, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China
2 State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China
3 Beijing Institute of Nanoenergy and Nanosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
4 MOE Key Laboratory of New Processing Technology for Non-ferrous Metals and Materials, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Processing for Non-ferrous Metals and Featured Materials, Guangxi University, Nanning, China
5 School of Materials Science Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, P. R. China