It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Candida albicans is a highly drug-resistant fungus for which new treatments are urgently needed due to the lack of clinically effective options. In this study, we evaluated the antifungal activity and mechanism of plasma-activated Ezhangfeng Cuji (PAEC) against Candida albicans and compared it with physiological saline (PS), plasma-activated physiological saline (PAPS) and Ezhangfeng Cuji (EC). After dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma treatment with EC for 20 min followed by a 10 min immersion of Candida albicans, the fungus was reduced by approximately 3 orders of magnitude. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) results showed an increase of 41.18% and 129.88% in the concentration of oxymatrine and rhein, respectively, after plasma-treated EC. The concentrations of reactive species (RS), such as H2O2,
Key Points
PAEC inactivates the fungus more effectively than PAPS and EC.
PAEC can destroy fungal morphological structure.
PAEC can reduce fungal virulence factors.
PAEC’s antifungal ability is due to the synergy between RS and TCM components.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of Chinese Medicine, The Postgraduate School of Anhui, Hefei, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.252251.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 8247)
2 The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Department of Dermatology, Hefei, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.412679.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1771 3402); Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.410745.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1765 1045)
3 The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Department of Dermatology, Hefei, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.412679.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1771 3402)
4 Anhui Medical University, Department of Dermatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Hefei, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.186775.a) (ISNI:0000 0000 9490 772X)
5 Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plasma Physics, Hefei, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309)