It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Next generation sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising method for treatment monitoring and therapy selection in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, distinguishing tumor-specific variants from sequencing artefacts and germline variation with low false discovery rate is challenging when using large targeted sequencing panels covering many tumor suppressor genes. To address this, we built a machine learning model to remove false positive variant calls and augmented it with additional filters to ensure selection of tumor-derived variants. We used cfDNA of 70 MBC patients profiled with both the small targeted Oncomine breast panel (Thermofisher) and the much larger Qiaseq Human Breast Cancer Panel (Qiagen). The model was trained on the panels’ common regions using Oncomine hotspot mutations as ground truth. Applied to Qiaseq data, it achieved 35% sensitivity and 36% precision, outperforming basic filtering. For 20 patients we used germline DNA to filter for somatic variants and obtained 245 variants in total, while our model found seven variants, of which six were also detected using the germline strategy. In ten tumor-free individuals, our method detected in total one (potentially germline) variant, in contrast to 521 variants detected without our model. These results indicate that our model largely detects somatic variants.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5645.2) (ISNI:000000040459992X)
2 Delft University of Technology, Delft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5292.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4740)
3 Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Pathology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.508717.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0637 3764)
4 Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Erasmus Center for Biomics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5645.2) (ISNI:000000040459992X)
5 Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.430814.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0674 1393)
6 Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.509540.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 6880 3010)
7 Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5645.2) (ISNI:000000040459992X); Delft University of Technology, Delft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5292.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4740)