Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between tunnel position in ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) and postoperative meniscus tears.

Methods

This was a single institution, case–control study of 170 patients status-post ACL-R (2010–2019) separated into two matched groups (sex, age, BMI, graft type). Group 1—symptomatic, operative meniscus tears (both de novo and recurrent) after ACL-R. Group 2—no postoperative meniscus tears. Femoral and tibial tunnel positions were measured by 2 authors via lateral knee radiographs that were used to measure two ratios (a/t and b/h). Ratio a/t was defined as distance from the tunnel center to dorsal most subchondral contour of the lateral femoral condyle (a) divided by total sagittal diameter of the lateral condyle along Blumensaat’s line (t). The ratio b/h was defined as distance between the tunnel and Blumensaat’s line (b) divided by maximum intercondylar notch height (h). Wilcoxon sign-ranks paired test was used to compare measurements between groups (alpha set at p < 0.05).

Results

Group 1 had average follow up of 45 months and Group 2 had average follow up of 22 months. There were no significant demographic differences between Groups 1 and 2. Group 1—a/t was 32.0% (± 10.2), which was significantly more anterior than group 2, 29.3% (± 7.3; p < 0.05). There was no difference in average femoral tunnel ratio b/h or tibial tunnel placement between groups.

Conclusions

A relationship exists between more anterior/less anatomic femoral tunnel position and the presence of recurrent or de novo, operative meniscus tears after ACL-R. Surgeons performing ACL-R should strive for recreation of native anatomy via proper tunnel placement to maximize postoperative outcomes.

Level of evidence

Level III.

Details

Title
More anterior placement of femoral tunnel position in ACL-R is associated with postoperative meniscus tears
Author
Hughes, Jonathan D. 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Gabrielli, Alexandra S. 2 ; Dalton, Jonathan F. 2 ; Raines, Benjamin T. 3 ; Dewald, Daniel 4 ; Musahl, Volker 1 ; Lesniak, Bryson P. 2 

 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pittsburgh, USA (GRID:grid.412689.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0650 7433); Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden (GRID:grid.8761.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 9919 9582) 
 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pittsburgh, USA (GRID:grid.412689.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 0650 7433) 
 The Hughston Clinic, Fort Walton Beach, USA (GRID:grid.417696.b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9413 275X); The Hughston Foundation, Inc, Columbus, USA (GRID:grid.417696.b) 
 Marquette University, Milwaukee, USA (GRID:grid.259670.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2369 3143) 
Pages
66
Publication year
2023
Publication date
Dec 2023
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
e-ISSN
21971153
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2831677095
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.