OBSERVATION
Bacteriophages, as the largest part of the gut virome, play pivotal roles in shaping gut microbiomes by direct interactions with their bacterial hosts or indirect influences on the host immune system (1, 2). A healthy gut generally has a phage–bacteria–host triangular relationship, with fruitful interactions and comparatively balanced structure (3). Bacteriophages that reside in the gastrointestinal tract are characterized by extraordinary stability and high diversity (4, 5). Although gut environments provide a bountiful source of bacteriophage genetic diversity, phages were more unexplored compared with bacteria and eukaryotic viruses (6). Megataxonomy of the virus world was actualized through a uniform standard based on viral hallmark genes (VHGs) that were widely conserved among various groups of viruses and provided a window to explore viral evolutionary relationships (7). Thereafter, the proposal was approved by the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses. Tailed dsDNA phages, for instance, constitute the order
The giant panda (
To explore the gut phageome of giant pandas and other relevant animals, including bears, red pandas, and musk deer, we conducted viral metagenomics research of bacteriophages in 413 feces samples from giant pandas, 161 from red pandas, 70 from bears, and 85 from musk deer. These samples were pooled into 65 libraries according to animal sources and sample size. After next generation sequencing, the 65 libraries generated a total of 175,261,692 raw sequence reads with an average length of 247 bp and an average proportion of guanine (G) and cytosine (C) in the sequences (GC content [GC%]) of 45.8%. The sequence reads were binned according to barcode and were assembled into larger contigs. In total, 690,673 phage contigs were obtained through
To investigate the constitution and distribution pattern of gut phage communities in different animal groups, a series of comparative analyses were performed. The distribution heatmap of phage communities presented that the phage contigs and singlets reads of giant pandas, red pandas, bears, and musk deer were classified into 10 phage families (Fig. 1A). Thereinto, the phage communities of giant pandas were mainly dominated by
FIG 1
Comparison of gut phage communities of giant panda and other relevant animals. (A) Distribution heatmap of gut phage communities. Heatmap representing the reads number of each phage family in exponential form. The names of phage families are presented on the left, and the library names are presented at the bottom. Different animal sources are represented by rectangles with different colors and animal names are indicated on top; (B) principal coordinate analysis plot; (C) Analysis of similarities was performed among four animal groups. Different animal groups are marked with corresponding colors (see color legend).
The order
FIG 2
The phylogeny of
The order
METHODS
Sample collection and preparation
During 2018 to 2020, to investigate the phageome of giant pandas and other relevant animals (including bears, red pandas, and musk deer), in total, 729 fecal samples were collected from Sichuan, Wuhan, Chongqing, and Shanghai in China using disposable materials (Table S1). Samples were pooled into 65 sample pools according to sample size and source, including 8 pools for bears, 33 for giant pandas, 16 for red pandas, and 8 for musk deer. Samples were re-suspended in 500 µL Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline and vigorously vortexed for 5 min, following frozen and thawed three times on dry ice. The supernatants were then collected after centrifugation (10 min, 15,000 g) and stored at –80°C until use.
Viral metagenomic library construction
Supernatant from each sample was pipetted and equally pooled into different sample pools to obtain the final volume of 500 µL. Sample pools were centrifuged at 12,000 g for 5 min at 4°C and then filtered through a 0.45 µm filter (Millipore). The filtrates enriched in viral particles were treated with DNase and RNase to digest unprotected nucleic acid (20 - 22). Then, the remaining total nucleic acid was isolated using QIAamp MinElute Virus Spin Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The viral nucleic acid samples were subjected to reverse transcription reactions using reverse transcriptase (Super-Script IV, Invitrogen) and 100 µmol of random hexamer primers, followed by a single round of DNA synthesis using Klenow fragment polymerase (New England BioLabs). Overall, 65 libraries were constructed using Nextera XT DNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina). All libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (23).
Bioinformatics analysis
Paired-end reads generated by NovaSeq were debarcoded using vendor software from Illumina. An in-house analysis pipeline running on a 32 nodes Linux cluster was utilized to process the data. Reads were considered duplicates if bases 5–55 were identical and only one random copy of duplicates was kept. Low sequencing quality tails were trimmed using Phred quality score 30 as the threshold. Adaptors were trimmed using the default parameters of VecScreen with specialized parameters designed for adapter removal. Bacterial reads were subtracted by mapping to the bacterial nucleotide sequences from the BLAST non-redundant (nr) database using Bowtie2 v2.2.4. The cleaned reads were
Viral community analysis
Composition similarity analysis of the 65 viromes were compared using MEGAN software (v6.21.7) (29) under the compare option. The results were presented using the Unweighted Pair Group Method with PCoA under Bray-Curtis ecological distance matrix with default parameters. ANOSIM was used to compare differences among groups using R v4.0.4 package vegan (v2.5.7). The viral community structure and richness results were visualized in the heatmap which was generated using R v4.0.4 package pheatmap (v1.0.12).
Viral sequences extension and annotation
Viral contigs were merged using the Low Sensitivity/Fastest parameter in software Geneious v11.1.2 (30). And the individual contig was used as reference for mapping to the raw reads of its original barcode using the Low Sensitivity/Fastest parameter. Putative viral open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted by Geneious v11.1.2 with built-in parameters (minimum size: 300; genetic code: Standard; start codons: ATG) (30) and were checked through BLASTp in NCBI. The annotations of these ORFs were based on comparisons to the Conserved Domain Database with an E-value cutoff of <10−5. Those contigs annotated with phage terminase large subunits (TerL) of
Phylogenetic analysis
Phylogenetic analysis was performed based on the protein sequences of phage terminase large subunits (TerL) identified in this study and protein sequences of reference strains belonging to different families of
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2023 Lu et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The gut flora is a treasure house of diverse bacteriophages maintaining a harmonious and coexistent relationship with their hosts. The giant panda (
IMPORTANCE
Gut phageome plays an important role in shaping gut microbiomes by direct interactions with bacteria or indirect influences on the host immune system, potentially regulating host health and disease status. The giant panda (
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer




