It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Cangrelor, the first intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor (P2Y12-I), has been approved on the basis of three large RCTs from the CHAMPION program which nevertheless have been criticized for the low bleeding risk of the enrolled patients, the large quote of chronic coronary syndromes, and the use of Clopidogrel as control arm even in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We sought to investigate, in the setting of ACS, the comparative performance of Cangrelor in terms of in-hospital ischemic and haemorrhagic outcomes compared with the current gold-standard of oral P2Y12-I. The study retrospectively enrolled 686 consecutive patients admitted to the Divisions of Cardiology of Policlinico of Bari and L. Bonomo Hospital of Andria for ACS and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. The study population was divided according to the P2Y12-I treatment strategy in two groups: patients given an oral P2Y12-I and patients receiving Cangrelor in the cath lab followed by an oral P2Y12-I. Clinical endpoints included death, ischemic and bleeding events occurring during hospital stay. Cangrelor treated patients presented higher clinical risk profile at presentation and faced higher death rate. However, after PS matching, in-hospital mortality resulted comparable between the groups and Cangrelor use was associated with reduced in-hospital definite stent thrombosis (p = 0.03). Data from our real-world registry highlight that, in the setting of ACS, Cangrelor is prevalently used in patients with very challenging clinical presentations. The adjusted analysis provides for the first time promising data on stent thrombosis reduction associated with Cangrelor use.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Division of Cardiology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (D.I.M.), Bari, Italy (GRID:grid.7644.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0120 3326); University of Bari, Cardiovascular Diseases Section, Cardiothoracic Department (DAI), Bari, Italy (GRID:grid.7644.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0120 3326)
2 University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Division of Cardiology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (D.I.M.), Bari, Italy (GRID:grid.7644.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0120 3326)
3 Lorenzo Bonomo Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Andria, Italy (GRID:grid.416083.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1768 5712)
4 Magna Graecia University, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Catanzaro, Italy (GRID:grid.411489.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2168 2547)
5 Federico II University of Naples, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Naples, Italy (GRID:grid.4691.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 385X)
6 Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Latina, Italy (GRID:grid.7841.a); Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Naples, Italy (GRID:grid.477084.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1787 3414)
7 “Pineta Grande” Hospital, Invasive Cardiology Unit, Castel Volturno, Italy (GRID:grid.517964.8)