It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
As a two-dimensional planar material with low depth profile, a metasurface can generate non-classical phase distributions for the transmitted and reflected electromagnetic waves at its interface. Thus, it offers more flexibility to control the wave front. A traditional metasurface design process mainly adopts the forward prediction algorithm, such as Finite Difference Time Domain, combined with manual parameter optimization. However, such methods are time-consuming, and it is difficult to keep the practical meta-atom spectrum being consistent with the ideal one. In addition, since the periodic boundary condition is used in the meta-atom design process, while the aperiodic condition is used in the array simulation, the coupling between neighboring meta-atoms leads to inevitable inaccuracy. In this review, representative intelligent methods for metasurface design are introduced and discussed, including machine learning, physics-information neural network, and topology optimization method. We elaborate on the principle of each approach, analyze their advantages and limitations, and discuss their potential applications. We also summarize recent advances in enabled metasurfaces for quantum optics applications. In short, this paper highlights a promising direction for intelligent metasurface designs and applications for future quantum optics research and serves as an up-to-date reference for researchers in the metasurface and metamaterial fields.
We reviewed recent intelligent methods for metasurface designs including machine learning, physics-information neural network, and topology optimization method.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Delft University of Technology, Department of Imaging Physics, Delft, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5292.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4740)
2 Delft University of Technology, Department of Quantum Nanoscience, Delft, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5292.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4740)
3 Northwestern Polytechnical University (NPU), Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Flexible Electronics (KLoFE), Xi’an, China (GRID:grid.440588.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0307 1240)
4 Delft University of Technology, Department of Imaging Physics, Delft, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.5292.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4740); SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Leiden, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.451248.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0646 2222)